Why did they change the site? Its harder to read.

I agree! I liked the old site. It was easy to navigate and we all knew our way around.

We can always change over to the other one....this one is a bit more discreet i think

I don't like the WIDTH.  It's wider than my browser window so I have to scroll left & right to read all the words of wisdom.  WHY WHY WHY

This new edition is a regressionfrom the former dedition of TER .  The color is most difficult to read.  The screen is so busy with stuff it is less easy to discern its use.  This edition does not  simplify the use of TER but  requires more time to access the same amount of information. than the earlier the former edition.  This is but a few comments regarding the backward move which this edition produces.

let me be a nerd for a second

I believe the difference is this is written in Java rather than classic ASP as the previous site - new technology and ensures a future for the system.  

They can always do something different with the colors.

...are subtle...soft, inviting...

Hey Im in Springfield the 11th. Come over and play!
and I'll show you soft and not so subtle.. wink..

-- Modified on 4/3/2005 7:21:46 PM

discreet? how?
ps
Guz,
Can you email me ..

You and I DEFINITELY have a follow-up coming. I'll show you the divinity of soft and subtle and you can show me the magic of bold and bright.

No banner ads with women...'cept for the one to the left but its small....

U have mail

...You two need to get a room

The colors are dull and they have narrowed the width of the page. The name of the minimized page is now Erotic review versus TER discussion board which makes it harder to leave minimized in mixed company. When you search for reviews you can't enter the area code and then tab and enter the phone number because you are sent to another area of the search section. It also runs extremely slow even after several days of the cookies being run. TER has made a huge mistake. Luckily slipry put a link to the old "classic" site that I have attached.

-- Modified on 4/3/2005 7:58:20 PM

I agree and disagree with both sides.  I think that the colors are better, but eggman makes a good point about the minimized version in regards to the title bar.  I also like that there are no naked lady banners on this new version, which makes for easier office surfing.  Overall, I think that a lot of the people that have been on the site for a long time are simply uncomfortable with change, as I am sure we all are.  But I think that in general most of the changes have been for the better.  Now, where as I would undoubtedly be at her mercy in person, I have to disagree with angelina about the color scheme.  Most of us are "not supposed to be here" as it would be, therefore the more subdued the site, the better.  I think that if we can all just give our suggestions and then maybe have an open forum in a few weeks to discuss further changes, I think that we can all be satisfied with the site.  One common thread throughout all of our opinions is that we love the site and want to make it better, which is rare in any online community, so lets take advantage of it.

The banners gone are good but the colors are washed out and its all harder to read. And it sesems alot slower. Just my opionion.

Ang

I liked the old site much better.

They're trying to convince each of us that our eyesight is failing--in addition to other things (even faster than they are).  Man, getting old is a bitch.

I agree with you darlin...it's hard to read-- change the color scheme - the layout is fine..

Thanks, MM

I really like it.  The colors are understated, which is easy on the eyes, much like many of you wonderful ladies.

That's my two cents.

Getting old is a bitch but since your eyesight is failing too bad you won't be able to see how you look

Well, I try not to "look" at that, anyway.  Being unable to may actually have its advantages.