Washington DC
Ok,
I submitted a review with in the last couple months on one of the girls from Blue Gems and the review was denied due to the agency being "delisted" but yet I see that a review of the agency was approved today!
http://classic.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=163971
Is there no consistancy in the approval of reviews???? I almost don't want to bother anymore because it seems I they are all denied at first and then I have to seek higher authority to get them approved. This trully makes the reviewing experience pretty cumbersome and I've grown tired of trying to contribute based on having to meet the ever changing criteria of what is required in a review!
I think perhaps the guidelines are clear.. but the folks approving the reviews have little or no understanding of what they are doing... I see one and two liner reviews with little more than I came, I saw, I felt, I fucked, I left... and I try to put forth significant effort when posting a review so I'm frustrated that I have to fight to get reviews approved... I only review a portion of whom I see anyway but this whole process has gotten me wondering why I submit a review at all...
I currently have one Unapproved review and the reason for the denial is that I did not provide enough info on my session!!!! WHAT?????? It's nearky five paragraphs in length and covers in significant detail my encounter with the provider. It trully seems that one out of every 8 - 10 reviews is approved without having to request someone else check it but I'm curious if others are seeing the same thing and share my frustration????
The Mod's do a great job here... I have no complaints there! but whomever is in charge of first tier review approval should be sent back to training on how r-e-a-d.....
Rant over... 
I feel better now!
Fog
