I just read a review, the reviewer says that he gave a lower score through no fault of the provider. So why not give her what she deserves?

Does performance actually mean the client's experience?

I have seen it more than a few times. One guy got spooked before a session and lowers the score, another has trouble finishing.

So why not just NOT say it and give a lower score? I wonder what their motivations are?

A session starts with the first email, phone call, whatever..
and ends when you walk out the door. I dont think performance is summed up purely by physical acts. Its a little more. A girl can blow your mind in the sack but if the TV is blaring, some one knocks on the door and the room smells like cigarettes Ill bet her score is significantly lower. Search the board for a post on the "5 senses" or "five senses"

specially those providers who have been around for a while, you read the first one or two and know what she does and how she is, the rest is like a bad re-run.

So many of them have so many reviews and it is basically the same thing, it is like a porn movie script, you sort of know what is next!

" you read the first one or two and know what she does and how she is, the rest is like a bad re-run."

Not necessarily so. I have seen providers that performance went up after time, with me, and other reviews I have read. There are plenty of cases where she was covered BJ at first and now she is BBBJ. Other performance enhancing techniques are also documented in reviews.
One of my favs would not allow COB when we first met, and now she has no problem doing snowballs, and if I drool some on her breasts, she rubs it in.
I imagine the reverse is also true in cases of bad hobbyist burn out,her performance would go down after time.
I usually read all the reviews unless she has page after page, and then I read the earliest and the latest.

There are 4 options that can qualify a provider for a score above 7. Only 3 of 4 are needed for a score of 10.

Actually, greek is a negative for me. I would rather not know that my provider does greek. I oughta take points off for that.

TER's system of rating for performance tends to be objective, so they set the rule -- not always enforced -- that a provider must offer certain services in order to be rated above a 7.

However, if we want to score based on the reviewer's experience, then it should NOT be called performance. I am all for scoring subjectively, as in appearance.

In your example, a blaring TV and the condition of the room is the provider's responsibility. A knock at the door is probably not. For example, if a reviewer is spooked by seeing a black SUV in the front of the hotel, whose fault is that?

My point in the original post is that if the reviewer says "through no fault of her own", then why fault her in lowering the score. He could always describe his total experience in the narrative. It is a matter of fairness.

I remember the "5 senses" post, except that there are more than 5 senses.

consider reducing prices and perhaps swallow

I think that it is up to me to decide how well on a scale of 1 to 10 how well the provider performed her tasks to make me happy that I spent so much money for a little pleasure.  Once in a lifetime score of ten should be reserved for that really great time that you had with that special lady.  Sometimes Greek will make that happen if you like it but it is not pre-requisite as Puck and TER has stated. If you had a poor time or were less than satisfied then you should score accordingly.  Unfortunately most will not score anyone less than a 7 if they got off and she was just laying there disconnected or drugged/drunk. I am just saying...

I usually read a few reviews if I'm trying to evaluate a possible companion. The very first review which usually yields the parameters of which services are available and description of the porovider. Then I often go to someone who has given a lower than usual score and compare to other reviews that particular reviewer has given. If there are any gals in someones list that I have also seen I'll check out for comparisons sake. You have to try to get an idea of what the reviewers are looking for. Anal for me is inconsequential since I'm just not that interested but multiple pops are important for me as well as time management. In the final analysis it's a guessing game with a few clues from the reviews. By the way Personally I'm more inclined to the GFE than PSE. Scores tend to be all over the place and have to be evaluated in terms of the reviewer's individual scale.