Thank god it was Saturday night that I had nothing to do and was able to read the thread below, It did entertain me for a while. To sum it all up, I saw

> guys who agreed that cheaper providers are better
> guys who said cheaper providers are risky, get more dick per hour, not clean, .etc.
> providers who posted about their view (They got a little publicity out of it which is always good)

I am one of them guys who I guess can be considered to be like the OP on that post. At times I just want a nut after a busy day and to be honest, I don't care much about a GFE or chit chat thing, I mean if I want GFE, I go and get a GF.

A quick look at my reviews will tell you that I mix and match, sometimes go for 15min, some times for 1hr and even more. It is all about the kind of mood I am in and also a quick check in my piggy bank to see what I can really afford. So my own real life experience is as following

1. Found some real bad deals on BP, but then it did not cost me much. I learned lessons to help me find better deals. Clearly I don't think these chicks had any dick in them, they were not worth a dick (No offense to those named Dick!)

2. Found some real good deals on BP, GREAT value for the $$ and I was just like those ladies who like to shop for great shoes at cheap price and when you find one I was all excited. I had the opportunity to stay longer with these girls, some do upsell so I don't think they are doing 15min a dick type of a deal. One I even met at a nice place. You should note that they offer great many options all the way to multi-hour.

3. One great hobbiest told me to ask Agencies if They do 30min, and said they will if you asked, so I did and must tell you it was the worse experience ever. The girl was pissed off that it was 30min, (I assume because of the $$s) and I had a real bad time. Review wasn't even worth it.

4. Had one traveling provider, real expensive but wanted to try one and I waited 30min, she was running late and then paid the price, and when i went to the bathroom saw the trash can was full of condom covers, and I was supposedly the first of the day in early afternoon.

so yes everyone has a price, it is not for us to say what they should charge for and everyone has their  taste, so as one very smart man said:

"Can't We All Just Get Along"!

But apparently you've seen some chicks with dicks on them, according to your reviews. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Just sayin'.

that there is anything wrong with posting under an alias

...the critical post was done by some pussy hiding behind an alias. Surprise, surprise.

On your OP, I've had great, and crappy, experiences with both less expensive BP chicks and more expensive, more mainstream chicks. Sometimes a pop in for a quick BBBJ is just what Daddy needs - just to take the edge off so I can concentrate on my work. In fact, I'm still looking for that chick that will swing by the house once a week for a $100 BBBJ.

Otherwise, you wouldn't be posting with so many aliases lately.

BTW, can I call you Iknow, Mr Solo?

I think the basic premise of the lower the price the more dicks is just flawed.  I think that was the case in the old days when independents ruled the day.  In the current climate, where the agency's appear to be setting the market it seems to be pretty clear it is the opposite.

I have read in countless reviews and board posts that the traveling agency girls are very heavily booked and get worn out rather quickly.  Not only are they constantly booked, but every client is trying to get their money’s worth in seeing how many pops they can get their allotted time.  I read one review recently where the guy dropped her score down because after his second pop at the 50 minute mark, she cleaned him up and started to cuddle instead of trying to go again.  To quote another poster from the previous thread "The only complaint I ever heard about a girl being "sore" was a $300/hr girl".  I have read that same thing in several reviews.

It only stands to reason that these girls would be busier.  They have a built in pre approved client base, they are better marketed, have glamour photo shoots, and for the most part you know what you are getting.  They also have full time schedulers who are constantly working to make sure there dance card is full.

I have generally found with the ladies I have seen through BP, they have answered their own phones, have had the times I was looking for available, and have been able to answer my calls when needed.  If they were constantly booked how could they do this?

All that being said when I do use BP it is not to find the cheapest way to get off.  I am generally trying to find a local independent lady who I can develop a continuing professional relationship with.  I have been lucky so far and have yet to get burned, but I do understand the risk is there.

A lot of talk about BP, very little of CL and Eros. All things being equal, meaning you'd do your best to check her out on ter, who do u prefer, BP, CL or Eros? I personally am a little leery of BP and Cl. Am I wrong?

Don't understand this post, but guess it's diferent all over the country. Here in Phoenix we use BP, not CL and a local AZ board. The vast majority insist on independant ladies only. Most are on P411 or TPR and require references or P411 or Date-Check. Agency's are all about controlling the price, working girls like a rented mule and moving on. But hey, whatever floats your boat.

Talked mostly about BP because I have been thinking a lot about the original post the op was referring to.  

I should probably make one thing clear; I am not someone who is always searching for the best deal.  In reality the Lady I see most regularly rates are at the high end.  I started looking at BP and CL because, as can be seen from my reviews, I have just gotten back into the game after about an 8 year hiatus.  Lacking the required references once I returned, I started looking elsewhere.

BP and CL are a little scary, but with the proper research, and thinking with the right head, I have done ok, knock on wood.

I was just trying to dispute the argument that just because a woman charges less she is automatically a "dirty hood rat" who is seeing 40 guys a day, or those charging $3oo an hour and up are pure as the driven snow.

I feel lucky to have been with everyone one of the ladies I have met, no matter what the price.

As pointed out, agency girls who are attractive and have rave reviews are often booked solid. They usually are visiting only for a week so they often want to make as much money as they can during their stay here.  Agencies accommodate them and fill up their slots.  At the end of the day, some of these girls are worn out and tired and their performance, as expected, goes down.  I've seen a number of reviews on girls who start out with 9 and 10 ratings and then start going down to 7 or 8.  So bottom line, 300/hr girls don't necessarily mean that they won't be seeing a lot of guys everyday.