Molly is an attractive 21-year old brunette—a makeup artist by trade (and it shows, wow!)—who has been in the business for about 3 years.  According to her, she has performed in a number of adult films (as a blonde, Holly Rider, and confirmed by Google search), but her performance today was pure GFE.  She is without question the most multi-orgasmic provider that I have met to date and I seem to attract them.  She has a knack of making you feel comfortable from the time you meet, and as a result, my time with her this afternoon was very pleasant and quite satisfying.

Location: Tysons Corner
Photos: Accurate
GFE: Yes+++
Services: DFK DATY Fingers BBBJCIM MPCFS
Fee: $$$
Rating: 9/9
Recommended: Yes, highly.
 
Full review to follow.

for the purpose of ranking or comparing a variety of women.

literally apples and oranges


Once she is larger than size 4 it's going to be very hard to earn a "modele material" score from moi lol

But others have differing preferences....

Looks are in fact, subjective.

Cheers!

The number scale on looks is very close as long as you look at the average, and on her profile where it says "BUILD" .. Some guys like ladies much thinner than thick and some like them much more reubenesque than thin..If TER discriminated with the number system based on what some view as true nines and tens then the system would be truly flawed..
 Think about this...A six foot Glamour  model would be a turn off to "some" guys because they aren't attracted to taller women..
But I am, and short ladies too..

and I think that the constant arguments over how some folks "score" providers are ample evidence.

There are other sites that use multiple descriptors instead of a numerical scale. I find the reviews there to be more "accurate" and certainly a lot more useful.

I have more than once visited someone elses 6 or 9 and thought - what the *(@# whas that guy thinking lol

everyone knows what inherent beauty is.  that is the scale that is supposed to be used.  just because some dude likes fat chicks does not make the fat chick an 8 or 9.  The fat-chick-lover knows she is not an 8 or a 9 and should score accordingly: "she is a 6 but I like heavier/thicker girls so for me she was a "personal 9".  

Yes, everyone knows what a real 8 or 9 is.  So use your heads and use the real scale.  

FYI/BTW - still confused?  could she be a Victoria's Secret model? no? then she is not an 8 or 9.

Everyone has their own taste and everyone has their own way of rating.  You take 10 women randomly off the street and the lady in question would be the 10.  You frankly loose any credibility when you say V Secret models are America's standard for an "8".  V Secret does not hire "8s" to model, all are considered "10" or would not make the cut.  Be real man.

I rate women based on age group.  Then pretty much envision where she would line up in 100 women of her age.  If she is top 5, she gets a 10.  If top 15, a 9.  Etc.

You say that everyone knows what a real 8 or 9 would be.  You have lost touch with the real world if you think the lady in question is less than an 8.  LOL  V Secret models are 8s - simply laughable.

But thanks for the good contributions you do make.

Maybe that's your thing, but I'd never give one a second look.

I agree with db911. I've been very disapointed by the grading scale of this board. Reviewers are very generous with their 8's and 9's!

women of model proportions - *while not representative of "typica" beauty* - are GORGEOUS. Tall and thin. *One* of my "types".

See there - that's what makes the world go round

and


why a linear numerical 'rating' scale is inherently flawed.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  If she's not your type, don't see her.  She is far from being chubby.  Obviously, the gent who saw her liked how she looked.  Live with it.

They are only "models" of human beauty because of the gay men who design their clothes.

Thankfully, Seal has knocked up Heidi a few times so she has some curves now.

Just because YOUR opinion of an 8 or a 9 is anorexic, doesn't mean that other body types cannot be judged an 8 or a 9.  I have seen some pretty UGLY skinny women and also have seen some absolutely beautiful curvy women.  So, your opinion doesn't work there either.

that one persons opinions as stated in reviews will in many cases not be useful to others of different tastes.

That's where the review comes in.  Look at the WHOLE PACKAGE and you will do fine.  It looks to me like you have been doing very well with this system.  Although it may have "flaws" for the gents searching for their perfect match, I'm certain you (along with DB911) are intelligent enough to look at ALL the information before seeing anyone.  

Cheers!

you only rely on a number rating for looks, good luck.

There are multiple ratings for decently reviewed ladies.  See their site pics.  As earlier said, look at body types.  Read the reviews for more clues.  Ask hobbyist who have seen them via PMs.  Heck, freakin ask the lady her weight when you book her if you have to.  Perhaps rude, but if that is what will satisfy a guy, better to ask.  

As far as tastes - TV show Cougar Town.  I have wanted to do Courtney Cox since the Springsteen video.  Definitaly not fat.  Still love to do her.  But if I had to choose, give me Busy Philipps with her hair down.  Reminds me of somebody I adore by the way, but I'll keep it a secret.  LOL

Guess what, I can see both a Courtney type provider and a Busy type provider.  Busy as in name, not high volume.  LOL

that I have an issue. These boards have been full of arguments about gents scoring too easily, score inflation, etc etc

This stems not from some "scorers" being "defective" but from *reliance* on a scoring system as though *every gent* had the same taste and evaluation.

I have done quite well buy using the whole package of tools provided by TER....

Cheers

GTM

and who criticize their tastes.

Get over it!

We're all different.

Use *all* of the tools at hand.

I have quite a few "just my types" as well and have had large success using TER.

But I do not rely on the "scores" alone

Cheers

GTM

Someone decided what was beautiful so everyone else must follow suit? This is a joke, right? I've seen so called "inherent beauties" that were hideous, so fucking skinny their hip bones juted out. And these women were on a runway catwalk. Gimme a fucking break.

Eureka!  Your words:
"This stems not from some "scorers" being "defective" but from *reliance* on a scoring system as though *every gent* had the same taste and evaluation."

Finally!  Every gent has different tastes.  What you consider to be an 8,9 or even a 10 he may consider to be a 5, 6 or 7 and visa versa.  There is no "inherent beauty" as DB911 so ineffectively tried to impose on us.  

I will never get tired of saying this: "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."  

Peace!

by someone whether I was a boy before.
My answer was if he thinks I was a boy before then he must be homo and pedophile.

LMAO.

next please....

xoJ.

I realize I don't need to justify my rating, but in order to have any credibility in the future I must.

1) My criteria for a "9" is quite simple - model material. I believe that in all but two of my "9" ratings, the individual had experience in either the lingerie or swimsuit modeling arena which is by definition, model material.

2) Molly is very photogenic. She has a natural (or in other words, an inherent) beauty about her. While it is difficult to determine from a photograph, her skin tone, texture, and sheen are excellent, as is her bone structure and posture. Her weight is proportional to her height and frame. If my memory serves me correctly, she is the highlighted actress on the cover of the adult DVD I cited in my full review (not approved yet). Might be an indication that others thought she was "model material".

3) I too believe the scale is useful if we use it correctly and I make every effort to do so. For example, I have yet to use a "10" (one in a lifetime) for appearance, because once that bullet is fired there are no more. However, my critic has assigned at least four (this doesn't seem like correct use of the scale to me).  

4) It is indeed difficult to apply objective criteria to a matter so subjective as an evaluation of appearance. I believe however that if we recognize our own predilections and attempt to remove the bias associated with them from our ratings, we can provide far more accurate and useful evaluations.

wow..I am shocked..How does one decide beauty for another?? Isn't beauty in the eye of the beholder (the beholder beingthe person who is righting the review) I can not beieve that someone wouldeven try and tell how torate someones looks or appearence..

I wonder how many guys think they all are all that ..and truth be nown, behind close doors, women admit he isn't siht.

I wish there was a place providers couldrate their clients.

Guys would run and hide...and they would stick their dicks between their legs in shame..

I agree there are stunning beauties of all sizes.
I do think curvy is sexy but also think the hip bones are sexy as well. I know I prefer it when there's a bit less cushion on my hips...but that's just me, and how i view myself. Many beauties in history have been in these times, plus size women. We are so bent on thin and thinner we have totally distorted whats healthy and beautiful to what sickly being some form of beauty.

I do wonder why so many men seem to be bent on the preteen look in a woman. Makes me wonder what their true desires are. Not healthy I think rather sick really.

seriously now...I don't give a flyin fuck if you are payin for it or not it just cracks me up at the level of how arrogant some of you assholes are.

we all know if you looked in the mirror you couldn't get a free date with an average girl 3 sheets to the wind trippin on mushrooms. yet you think your almighty dollar excuses that fact. well it doesn't. you are still some damn ugly assholes.

some of you are such nit picking jerks with asshole personalities you have no choice but to p4p.

I say some cuz there are others who are sweet and nice and decent Gentlemen. you know who you are...on both sides of the scale.  since we are talkin scales here...

I am 5'1" and 135 pounds. I make no bones about this. The lovely girl in the picture is not chubby. She is thin and proportionate. Everyone has subjective views about beauty. I may be one mans 8 and anothers 10. It is in the eye of the beholder or consumer in this regard. Thanks to this thread I bet that adorable little thing is getting booked like a firecracker.

She looks hot to me; in fact I'm glad to see a mini since I'd already seen her pic and was dissapointed dby the absence of reviews;

As for comments of others, that just goes to show that you have to read reviews; one person's 10 is another's 6; and I've seen reviews that seemed like the same except one rated it a 7, another a 9 or 10.

If you just go by numbers and don't read the reviews, you are missing many excellent opportunities.

Some difficulty and delays associated with getting my full review approved. Any questions, PM me.