Most of the agencies around here have phot shopped pics. The degree varies from lady to lady. I underrstand some of it is done to protect their identity, so there is validity in it. Though in many cases I have witnessed, that your totaly surprised one way or the other when you show and knock on the door. PureGirlFriends does not, and insists on natural beauty of the lady in their pics. Which is what I lean towards. Trying to find the balance might be tough because of a wide audience. Though, from what I have read on these boards, the excessive photo shopping is disdained for the most part. I could be wrong. I will also agree that photo shopping in whatever degree can take away from the beauty fo the provider and is a distraction. Yes, "less" is more. I think some guys like certain surprises, or at least be kept wondering. But that depends on the individual who is looking for a provider.

We need more members to chime in on this.

She posts candid shots on a regular basis and it drives us guys crazy.

Petite Nicole (who I have not yet met) could teach everyone a lesson about pictures.  Revealing-to a point-and incredibly creative. The consistency of the image seems to speak to accuracy.  I keep thinking that if her creativity in pictures is an indicator of what a client would find an encounter could be amazing

If I see they were taken by Scott Church, I look at all of them. Guaranteed to be hot shots. I also like pics where the lady has a least one shot dressed in regular clothes. Gives you a glimpse of her personality and the fantasy that you may have seen her somewhere.

Some pro shots are nice... please keep alterations minimal (outside of security)

Generally, I like candids, especially those that show some personality. Nobody wants to visit a lady with a dour looking face in her photos, no matter how hot she is. If she can't muster some personality for a few photos, what will she do if she has too get up close and personal with my hairy butt

Words that come to mind for the pro shots: provocative, teasing, explicit/revealing, fun, creative...

in focus and clear. If it is for a website they should be taken with a good camera. With every camera having digital capabilities you do not have to spend a lot of $ to produce a good photo and there is no reason to post a poor one. I like the more professionaly produced photos, providing they are an accurate representation of what will be seen when the door opens.

Many of the photos, not all, taken with a phone camera tend to be blurry and are great for posting the quick candid shots but do not always flatter the lady.

Yes, ultimately I want to see you nude but I like galleries that start with you clothed and then reveal more of who you are as you progress. Reagan Rourke, (we have not met, yet) has a photo of her in denim shorts pulling a t-shirt off over her head. To me it is an extremely erotic shot and I get goose bumps looking at her goose bumps.

I prefer the less racy, softer poses that are taken in an intentional manner with forethought and purpose. Also, I like the photos of Danika Zaya/Zyanjha and Bryleigh, (have not met either of them, yet)

But that's just me

I appreciate the whole body shape / figure therefor I prefer

pics that show the whole body. These may be posed artfully to emphasize the positive - no argument from me. I also really like a pretty face so I appreciate a nice portrait but not heavily glam, almost prefer candid or semi-candid here. Of course I understand that many will prefer not to show their face.