Seriously, this is not new news, they all lie about their age, in this business, and in real life.

We all know you take issue to their profiles, size, weight, age, et. So I guess it's not really an informational post, but posting to joke about the obvious.

If it is not a post to joke or make humor of those discrepancies, but you truly take serious issue with those who lie about their weight (even when they are reviewed and that is noted) their age (which we all know they lie about) and it disturbs you enough to post, that is sad.

So would you do the one you posted about or not?

Would you not do her because she lies about her age?

And if you take issue with my unsolicited reply, then maybe you have a delicate stomach hahaha

http://www.eros-dc.com/files/246205.htm

http://www.freeones.com/html/t_links/bio_Tanya_James.php

Here is my advice for you: do not read my posts as they are obviously ruining your day/week/month/yr/decade/whatever.  Just move along.  You can put your little pinky finger up on the screen when you see db911 so as to avoid upsetting your delicate stomach.

I'll bet the pictures are of her when she was 24!!!!!! ROTFLMFAO

and identifying fake pix/info is important too.  I do agree that a 4 year difference isnt much but his other posts are generally good DD. Also, it is generally easy to research xxx stars. But you would be wrong about being hot nomatter her age. After a certain age point, I don't see girls who are older than myself. No matter what her photos are like, age is difficult to hide and sagging lines baggy skin here and there are turn offs for a younger guy like me.

But bro, when was the last time you contributed any significant info to the community?

Granted, this particular post from db isn't his best but You are busy bashing other people's contributions and the other half you are posting stuff along the lines of how great you feel about your ATF. Good to know you are so fond of her and such feelgood posts are welcomed by me, but it isnt as helpful as a real due diligance.

Might I suggest you get off your high horse... just saying.

If she is too old, it is a deal killer for me, so due diligance is important... maybe not this particular thread but his other contributions are certainly helpful.

Db and I seem to prefer thinner and younger ladies so I know where he is coming from.  Case in point, a girl advertising as ass size 34 should look 34 because when I walk in and notice that her ass is size 37, it looks much less attractive... to the point of losing the stiffy. Weight is important. Some guys are very very picky about this stuff...

I'm not wk for anyone either, and we're all ter buddies here including yoko and your sorry ass.

Just saying that the cumulative and collective value of such dd isn't useless.

Although this particular post with a 28 year old xxx star wasn't useful for me, since I often see porn stars and I find it easy to verify their real age... I came to appreciate db's style and his input. Vast majority of it certainly isn't useless and saves my lazy ass from having to click more buttons doing additional research.

Besides how many people on these boards are experienced enough (or have the time) to do all the dd for themselves?

She is not lying by that much..4 yrs not a whole lot.  Some girls manage to stay in mid twenties for ever...

No one is denying that she is hot. She might be the best in the business when it comes to sucking cock. That being said the fact still holds true that her age is misrepresented on EROS.

And its just not her. There is a systemic problem in the business of misrepresenting the age. Have you never experienced that the girl who answered the door was way too older than what she claimed. If you haven't, then probably you need to get laid more often...

It's not isolated to the business. In fact this systemic problem of misrepresenting the age has been going on for decades, if not centuries, in the civilian world, it's called vanity hahaha.

The only time I would take issue is when after reading all the reviews of someone I plan to see and the reviewers lied, I'd blame the reviewers, not her, because I know ALL women lie about their age (OK 99.9%).

See most of those of the guys here aren't risk takers and will only see someone reviewed. And those who are risk takers are already aware that the ladies sometimes lie. We only hope that those risk takers such as Beefeater500 will post their reviews. But have you noticed those risk takers even though the chances are pretty high that some aspect of the photo, ad, or profile is likely to be a fabrication, they still take the risk?

As for DB's observation, who wouldn't have known her real age if they cared to do the research and reduce the risk. It really didn't benefit me, or others I know, it is only his speaking out on things he takes issue with.

His post doesn't deny posting about fake pics isn't important, it doesn't deny posting about LE isn't important. I think really it's all about the thing with the age which you agree with.

And I guess because I post a comment or opinion to post's like yours I might be considered unfavorably, or it taken as a bashing, Oh well

OK now I will get off my little pony, I can't afford the High Horse hahaha

Oh, and as for his contributing useful info, well can you tell me what you have contributed useful here? From what I can tell you have only posted your opinion, like he did, or an observation for that matter. Posted a total of 3 times using this alias. At least he doesn't hide behind the facade of an alias.

Have a wonderful weekend, and I thank all veterans the best day and thank them for their service in protecting our rights and freedom.

But sometimes I'd rather the ladies not post their age. Their biological age is not important; taking care of the body is. I've seen ladies in their late thirties to early forties who look and feel better than some in their twenties.

I see it more relevant if you are the first and there are no others before you giving their reviews and comments. We only hope those reviewers are honest.

Yes, I have walked in, and out of appointments when what was advertised did not present itself, unlike many who we are fortunate to read about in their reviews, thinking with the little head, I get a laugh from reviews like that.

What also makes me laugh is before there was BBS (not Bare Back - Bulletin Board) connections, before there was AOL, Prodigy, and the full complimented internet with high speed broadband connection, there was only print, and word of mouth. Did you hobby back then?

It's always a roll of the dice, but these days the dice are loaded in our favor with reviewed ladies, and it works against us when our little head takes over and we see someone not reviewed. We only hope it's half as good as it was advertised. But OK, you do walk when that 34 ass turns out to be a 37 right?? Tell the truth, you are not one who thinks with the little head, stays, and complains in a review later are you? I'm betting you have, but how can I tell, I'm talking to an alias.

I agree with you. But we know it makes a difference to some. They insist they give up the age. As if it's mandatory and they shouldn't be in the biz if they don't.

Even when their looks are hot as hell, some take issue to not knowing and won't see them, DB911 is one of them I think.

I guess some only want to fuck girls who are under 30, even especially if they are well over, and yet look under 30 and are hot as hell. To each his own.

....see how you view db's post.  I've experienced on a couple of occassions extreme difference in what was presented in ads and what was behind the door.  So you should try TOFTT more vs. doing research before you hobby and you will see the extreme difference in what is advertised and what answers the door can be very different.

So go get laid more

She's been making movies since 2002.  If she started making movies nine years ago, and she's 24 now...

i've noticed on some ads that as years go by, the age actually decreases! maybe H.G. Wells is a favorite client? LOL!

In Oscar Wilde's novel, the man stays young while his portrait ages. On Eros, the women age while the photos stay the same.

The difference between 28 and 24 is huge.

Last year I was with a girl who was advertised as 22, now 23, who offhandedly said something about "back when I was 24" during the session.  She already looked older than her pics, but her confirmation of the lie was a major turn-off.

But then again you are a real man with real manners.  You are a man who treats people (men and women) with respect.  And I appreciate you.

Thank you for all your posts.  Aaahhhh the voice of reason!  Love it.

because so do I.  

Since when was making a comment on a girl's weight age considered offensive? What is more offensive is false advertisement. True, everyone knows that it is widely practiced, nothing new there. However, it isn't something we need to accept. Many of the young porn stars I have seen advertised their true age.

Also, I highly doubt that my younger age should be an issue with the experience.  I've been around long enough and dated a few. I hobby at least once a week with the hottest ladies in the business, who rate at least a 9 in appearance. I know many of them on a personal level, many close friends, and know their side of the business very intimately as well.  

While I've met a few MILFs older than I am who are still hot, in general I am not interested in seeing a 35~40 year old "hottie" who advertises many years younger than she actually is.  That is false advertisement. Just because it is widely practiced does not mean I'm going to put up with every occurrence of it. Also, vast majority of the 20 something porn stars I see have not lied about their real age because it is extremely easy to find out their real date of birth.  In all honesty, your assumption that 'it is typical in the business so it should be accepted' is BS.  It is typical only for those who dismiss the importance of due diligence and the collective contribution. Guys like db and I have been able to avoid the false advertisers with some reasonable success.

Also, pictures can not be trusted. You should know this if you've been hobbying for as long as you say you have. This is where due diligence comes in. Maybe it fools those with less keen eye or the the older folks with bad-eye sight.  No offense intended to the older folks, but in general they seem OK with such huge age-gap and can't differentiate between a 20 year old hottie versus a 30-something hottie. This does not mean others are ok with it too.  

I can clearly notice an older girl and lose my wood if she doesn't look 20-something. So a post like db911 is much more helpful and useful than vast majority of reviews from guys who tend to freely give away 8s 9s and 10s to older MILFS that I'd wouldn't even consider giving a 7.  

I'm not implying that you give them away freely, I haven't even read your reviews because from a quick glance it appears we have a very different taste in women. I generally don't see the type of girls you see, with the exception of maybe 1 or 2.  I stick to  ladies who are younger than I am and learned not to dismiss guys like db911 who seem to be able to point out the subtle difference that I tend to seek out as well. It saves me from having to click through and waste my time browsing a girl I won't even be interested in seeing...  I find it very helpful.

I too look at life in a positive manner, not sure why that was an issue here. Also, like I said... it is nothing personal. We're just having a friendly conversation.

My speculation could be completely wrong but I suspect that some us of who object to db911's post do not feel that a comment on girl's weight and age by itself is considered offensive. I think they object to the tone of the post and that they have a bias against db911 tendency to bash providers. I can identify with that because I'm kind of whiteknigthy too.

I've always felt that we should judge the merit of a post by its content and not by its author. That's the reason why I am a proponent of posting with an alias. Unfortunately, some of us are opponents of that.