Washington DC

Heather Anderson from EGC
michaeljordan45 76 Reviews 1284 reads
posted

Why is her rate higher than the others from the group? Everyone else is at 3 and she is at 3.5. Her menu seems pretty standard.  Her performance from her reviews seems mediocre.  Yes, she looks good in her pictures but we all know they all do touch-ups.  Her profile doesn't say she's a porn star or something that sometimes will make a higher rate.

-- Modified on 11/20/2011 4:47:13 AM

JustALittleTipsy308 reads

Your guess is just as good as ours...  

Maybe they go by the rule that the cuter looking ones are designated with a $50 overhead tax just for being good looking. Apparently, experience does not seem to factor into the price.

Her latest review of CBJ was a surprise because she gave me BBBJ.  Maybe she's limiting her menu now.

While she's good looking and all, I think she needs to have a little more enthusiasm in her occupation. Maybe it's just her personality type.

She also needs to expand her menu a little bit more in order to make it to the top in this business.  All the top 10 ladies seem to have two things in common:  good looks & performance.


When sunlight reaches our atmosphere during the day, nitrogen scatters the blue part of the light spectrum the most. The sky is reddish at sunset because dust and particles near the ground scatter the red part of the light spectrum the most.

EGC is charging more for Heather because they think they can get away with it. The seller's misson is to jack the price of the product as high as the market can take. This is why you see outrageous prices at the supermarket. Real orange juice is now over $4.00 for under a gallon.

If she actually looks like her pictures then the $50 is warranted...  It is always funny to me how bent people get about $25-50 bucks when you are already paying $300-500...  The other girls are not ugly, so if $350 is too much, then see them.  Likely, it will be better anyway, since Heather is likely to be inundated and overworked.  Just my opinion.

I haven't visited a provider from EGC in well over a year. I find most of them to be unattractive and not worth my hard earned money. The few that have caught my eye never stayed around long enough for me to schedule a session, and so far they have never returned. The same can be said for the other two well known agencies as well. I prefer to sit and wait for a good Indy to float by or for the occasional out-of-town hot agency girl to travel through.

Theodore Sturgeon was correct when he said that ninety percent of everything is crap.

nobarnum513 reads

Lucky me I have a steel trap when it comes to faces...I knew I'd seen her before and I dont hobby (I just follow the sport for fascination reasons)...anyway, maybe this explains your extra 50 bucks cheap ass.

Posted By: cageyboy
I haven't visited a provider from EGC in well over a year. I find most of them to be unattractive and not worth my hard earned money. The few that have caught my eye never stayed around long enough for me to schedule a session, and so far they have never returned. The same can be said for the other two well known agencies as well. I prefer to sit and wait for a good Indy to float by or for the occasional out-of-town hot agency girl to travel through.

Theodore Sturgeon was correct when he said that ninety percent of everything is crap.

JustALittleTipsy383 reads

I became aware of this a while ago through someone. But I honestly don't think you should post this here on a public board.  If she wanted to let this be known in public, she would have advertised it as such.

Dude, porn is forever.  You can't escape having that in your past, unless you are the the anonymous dick in the scene.  And being in a porno usually supports increased rates.  If she didn't want this known, it's probably because she comes off like a dead fish in this scene and didn't want potential customers to think this is the kind of enthusiasm (or lack thereof) they'd be getting if they booked her.  Most providers that have done porn encourage hobbyists to check out their videos.  I can see why she didn't.

Cheap ass? I have six reviews to my credit you numbnut. I see that you have...nothing. This means that you haven't seen a provider yet or are too lazy to write a review. You seem to be cheap with your own time and money.

Comemierda

So she does have some credentials. That will justify the agency putting a higher price tag on her.   Just hope thats not something that she doesnt want people to know.

It is amazing how some people can just look at a face and tell he/she has been in porn and is actually able to find it on the Internet!

Maybe Heather Anderson is or is not worth the extra $50 and EGC is overcharging but read the reviews of Taylor Smith and they are they seem to be underpricing!

On the one hand, her rate is higher than other ladies at that agency.  On the other hand, her higher rate is still less than what several less attractive (IMHO) indies charge.  And she's splitting that higher rate with the agency.  If she was smart, she would have done a few trips at the going rate to build up clientele (and client contact info) and then gone indy.  Assuming, of course, that she offered an experience that was worth repeating - which there seems to be conflicting reports about.  Even if her rate stayed the same as an indy, she'd be taking home more.
There's really nothing new about this.  There have been several agency gals who've come through at a higher price point than most of the other ladies at the particular agency.  

Posted By: michaeljordan45
Why is her rate higher than the others from the group? Everyone else is at 3 and she is at 3.5. Her menu seems pretty standard.  Her performance from her reviews seems mediocre.  Yes, she looks good in her pictures but we all know they all do touch-ups.  Her profile doesn't say she's a porn star or something that sometimes will make a higher rate.

-- Modified on 11/20/2011 4:47:13 AM



Her picture no longer seems to be on the site.

Register Now!