If you just run the phone number, you get a single bad review by Mr.munch, who says he went to see Rebecca for the second time, and found someone else, that Rebecca had left early.  The review says he had posted an earlier review of the real Rebecca, with whom he had a good time -- but if you look at all of his reviews, the only one of Rebecca is the bad, second one.

Jeep, she was apparently the same girl in the photo the first time Mr. Munch saw her. In fact he was pleased enough to have scheduled a second appointment only to get the substitute that is now reviewed under Rebecca's #. Since TER allows hobbiests only one review of a provider they have removed the review of the true Rebecca. This is a case where the second review should not have replaced the first.

Right, TMAN.  I thought TER allowed you to post two reviews.  In any case, since these are reviews of two different women, both should be up, so that people know both that the woman in the pictures is real, and that she sometimes pulls a bait-and-switch.  If I had $5 for every time I read a review that said, "It wasn't the woman in the pictures, but I decided to stay anyway," I could challenge Master Jeep.

Forget it, the picture's are of Susana Spears, a knock out model who does quit a bit of picture's for men's magazine's and some porn movies.

Look familiar?

Figures, always loved her pictures, but thought they were too good to be true.

I just called her and asked her a couple questions rearding her pics on eros. I asked her if she ever posed for a web page or private pics and she said no.
After a little more questioning she finally said that the girl in the pics could not make it here and she was subsituting for her.
This is pretty bad.   wow
hope nobody falls for this one

or I might have gotten it.  Wonder who Mr.Munch saw the first time.

Damn, and I hoped you were going to say it was really her. I'd be burning rubber for the bank and then to see her. Susana Spears is outrageously hot. As usual, if it's too good to be true it probably is.