I could not help but noticed that there is a review posted for a provider who will be available only later this week as per their website (confirmed with the agency). But Mr.John has written a review saying he met this girl recently in this area. So do the agencies own these handles to post great reviews enough to stir up the pot for some initial traffic.

Your post is about a "fake review" on the Wash. DC board, and you have "DC" in your *alias*, but the review you say is "in this area" is in Sacramento. On top of that, she's a heavily reviewed provider who, it appears, has been out of the business since 2005. Do I have that right?

-- Modified on 6/12/2023 8:50:40 PM

you have a bit of an obligation to post the link.  

No idea who you may be referring to.

The first reply to this thread should have made you more skeptical than you already were. Here's a link to the review he's talking about... a review from 2005: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=Mr%2EJohn
 
I can't know what's wrong with DC69DC, but his brain is apparently messed up, or he missed some important clues when he search, namely it's a different girl by the same name and the one he's looking at is no longer working... for like 20 years.

Stacy doesn't start until tomorrow as per the ad. But there is a review for her already in the Merrifield area.  

Since they don't list the start date on the page, and putting up ads without some indication of "starting on X" or "Coming Soon" is a bit unusual but it is a newer agency here.  But a week in advance seems like too much lead time.  

The reviewer has a total of 21 reviews.

I was approached by this agency a few months ago to submit reviews of a girl I hadn’t seen. Needles to say I didn’t comply as I want this site to be an honest resource but unfortunately it’s filled with fake reviews and shills.

STFU dood, it’s a fake review and the fake reviewer included the NOVA area on the location of the review.

To just get an answer to the direct question, yes sometimes the provider or the agency will write some type of promotional review (fake). And, sometimes one of the long time customers -- either of the girl or the agency -- will get a session before the official start date and then write a review. What's going on here, don't know.  

The confusion could have been avoided had the reviewer used her original TER ID 369093 I stress of creating a new one.

True that. Looks like Stacy is well-known and has a lot of reviews under this ID 369093 (which I was not aware of). But the original post was to validate if the review was genuine or not. Stacy starts on 6/14 as per the agency, but the review was posted 3 days ago on 6/11. But we can also not rule out the fact that this monger may have privilege access to the models and gets to try them first.

You cannot even rule out that she started before the 14, the ad pics were up but no date listed (I don't think I ever saw a date listed for Kimmi) so they might have told you one thing just to have you wait and then decided to update the page with the current date (was not there yesterday) for whatever reason (maybe they told a bunch of other people what they told you ????).

Just wanted to add some additional info here.  I also had some of the same questions about that first review and timing for Stacy but most of the experiences I have had with that agency have been good so I let that weigh into my decision to see her.  I do NOT have any sort of preferential treatment with the agency and you will see that while I have seen a few of their ladies I see many others both agency and independent and I wouldn't say I am a regular there.  
What I would say is that Stacy delivered and you will see my review that just posted. I don't have many 9s but she deserved it.

I'd like to put out the fire I started. I wanted to see it for myself, so I met Stacy yesterday. Amazing girl, and she loves what she does. Open menu. She did confirm that she did started earlier than what her ad stated. But kept it low-key until her body accustomed to the time zones. Posted a review for her on the original TER ID. Happy hobbying!

Bravo. Thanks for the scoop.

Funny, my first response to this thread was after I had looked up monger "Mr.John." I found easily found him and thought that his review of Stacy was the review in question.  
 
What was your point about him calling the reviewer Mr.John? Which handle were you referring to?

Search on "mr.john." You'll see why I reacted the way I did. I'm not the one who introduced that new moniker for hobbyist; how was I supposed to know he wasn't referring to user mr.john?
 
You thought you knew it was fake, however, after reading DC69DC's final explanation at the end of this thread you are mute. What, no corrections? Your replies with unfounded accusations of behavior that would, if true, each be in violation of TER's P&P. But they're not. The right thing to do would be to go to each place you cast unfounded aspersions and apologize to the member, or at least admit you were misleading fellow mongers and regret that.
 
Otherwise, GFY "doode." (WTF!! LMFAO.😂😂)

None of his claims has been proven. And after reading quite a few reviews for quite a few of their girls, I'd have to say that it would take quite the concerted effort, Internet Research Agency type effort, to develop all those fake profiles and concoct all those fake reviews.
 
If you want to read a not-fake and not-a-shill recent review of an SA girl, read mine. You can't make this shit up! LOL.

Quite the fireworks! Thanks for the closure.

I think this is the second time you posted a link to a review of yours that can't be read. I'm guessing you go to "my reviews" and use that link but no one other than yourself can read it.  

Thank you for pointing that out!! I guess most guys are using the link. LOL.
 
Please do me the favor of using the link below and tell me if I've corrected the problem. Thanks.

That link works as intended.

Thanks.
 
I can't think of what it was that possessed me to link the URL for the personal view... more than once. I really know better. I just don't know what I was thinking.😵🥴 I'm not implying anything with those.