I am always suspicious of women posting beautiful pictures on EROS without TER reviews, and especially if they have no web site. I can understand a women not having reviews, but she should then make the effort to create a web site since it’s not very difficult. Especially if she claims to be a VIP, she could make the effort to establish a website.
I have had two experiences in meeting such women and both were very disappointing (a warning). I rated one woman, TER 233424, a 5/2. The pictures were hers, but it was very apparent that she posted old pictures to catch men in the DuPont Circle area who wanted something to do during their lunch hour or after work. It made me think that there are a lot of women who pirate other’s pictures or use out-of-date pictures, and work for a few weeks to earn extra money quickly.
I decided to use Google image to find other web sites where their images are posted, and to write them to ask if they are really the (Playboy Playmate, Playboy Cybergirl, Model Mayhem model, etc. (you fill in the blank here)) and see what they reply.
Since late September last year I have written 71 Eros posters who (1) had no TER reviews, (2) have no web site, and (3) had an email address to which I can write. I tried to write every women posting on EROS-DC since September 23, 2013 to date who met there criteria, but I cannot assure that someone may have slipped through the cracks.
I wrote a very nice email, “Dear U, I noticed your very pretty pictures on Eros at V which says you will be in Washington from W to X. Are you the (Model Mayhem model, Playboy Playmate, Playboy Cybermodel, etc.) Y who is posted at Z ? If so, I would very much like to meet you.
What do you charge for one or two hours? Where is your incall? When is your first appointment during the day?”
So I was trying to say, “If you are this person, I would like to meet you.” The results are
Email sent 71
No reply 53
Pictures were stolen 1
Yes, that’s me! 8
Vague replies that seemed to ignore my question 6
I stole the pictures from someone else! 1
For more details on the last response see http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=6&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&SearchType=1&Author=willockham&DayFrom=30&DayTo=0&MessageID=257813&frmSearch=1#257813
So assuming that women did not reply because their photographs are fakes or outdated, an Eros poster who has (1) no TER reviews and (2) no web site has about a 1 in 9 chance of being woman in the photographs. Being EROS Verified seems to have no effect on that probabilliy.
This had led me to propose a rule: If she has (1) no TER reviews, and (2) no website, STAY AWAY!!
