They are certainly interesting and they have the administration on the defense...I do not know what to make of it.  I was unable to watch his interview on 60 minutes.  Did anyone out there catch it.  What do you think?

Hi there! Mr. Clarke is a credible subject-matter expert, having been a part of several administrations. His main points appear viable, and certainly should factor into this year's election campaign. It is regrettable that the current administration appears to be attacking Mr. Clarke for airing legitmate concerns.

dc

My opinion is that Clarke's allegations corroborate what Paul O'neal said about the Bush presidency.  Simplified, Bush had an agenda and didn't want to be bothered with the facts.  I think that a quote from Tolstoi is appropriate: "------there are two kinds of people; one use their reason to learn what is good and what is bad and they act according to this knowledge; the other act as they want to and then use their reason to prove that that what they did was good and that which they didn't do was bad".

That's what's killing that "other" board.  Can't we preserve TER for discussions of  important things like how we're going to get laid next?

Reo we need this here?

Richard Clark is pissed off punk. He failed to get a promotion and now he is taking it out on Bush. Mr Clark also has a long history of having problems working with females especially minority females. He was also pissed off because he was demoted.