He agreed that it was an accurate review but wanted to make sure I didn't harp on the negatives repeatedly.

My review of Emma Dupree was held up for a few days on deferred status as TER was investigating whether it was "verifiable".  It was finally posted this evening ....

On my most recent review, entered 3 days ago, the status has changed to "Deferred" with the reason provided as, "On Hold".  Can someone explain?  Just curious, as I have not seen this before, as reviews have either been approved or rejected (with a reason given).  I am not sure what "on hold" means...

for the paroxysms of laughter to die down before addressing specific issues.

Admin1:  Hey, come over here, you have to read this!
Admin2 (reading over shoulder): Bwahahaha! Can you believe this guy?
Admin1:  Seriously, where do they come up with this stuff?
...

Thanks Renaissance!!!

END OF MESSAGE

Years ago I had one that happened with.  It was because they read something in my review that seemed out of the norm with the lady's other reviews and they wanted to check with her that my review was not faked.  Everything checked out--turns out I was the first reviewer after she changed her menu--but it took a while.  I do not know if that is the case here or not.