A new provider just earned a 10 rating for an exceptional performance. Why was my review of her doctored to reflect a 7 rating? Is this a new TER policy? Is it a fair way to represent the market?
The profile indicates cbj but in your review you didn't mention the condom, that could be an error you want to correct which would also allow her score to be higher. The rules is the rules (even the ones we don't like). I'm glad someone is watching the reviews, I just wish it was more consistant. Lots of high scores have slipped through on girls with very limited menus.
I second the reviews slipping through. I may do lots of things but some people have preference to say "keep it all covered." So therefore when writing the review it should reflect that it was all covered. Since that was the experience and part of the guidelines. The guys who read them and know it grade appropriately most of the time. Then I also think some just do not know better. Any thoughts?
I don't think TER should change any review. If the board doesn't like a reivew or doesn't feel like it falls under their review guidelines, then why post it? Changing what someone experienced is editing the truth.
And what about all the details that the reviewer perhaps didn't include for discretion purposes?
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!