However tineye hits are not a standard procedure for either hobbyists or review oversight staff as far as I know.

There is good reason for this. Tineye does not cover everything. It gives false positives as well as false negatives. It returned nothing when I tested it on a wonderful lady in my profile who had an extensive modeling career for instance. It may have improved since then.

You are doing the right thing by flagging this as stolen pics, most likely. The reviewer was probably happy and didn't check. The most important thing about the reviews was whether folks were safe and had an enjoyable experience. Posts such as yours help weed out the frauds.

I had noticed the review and was suspicious.  Just goes to show that review history of a reviewer doesn't necessarily mean a review is valid.

...checking a provider's pics would have anything to do with accepting or rejecting a hobbiest's review.  Although many do check, it's certainly not an obligation of the hobbiest to do so.  To reject a (supposedly) valid review because the provider used fake/stolen photos would be unfair to the reviewer.  Checking pictures might well be expected before initially listing a provider.  However, theoretically, a provider could have fake/stolen pics and actually provide good service and earn good reviews.

If I had an honest review rejected because the provider used fake/stolen pictures, I'd be really angry.

As has been discussed many times on this board, many providers use fake pics, including some very good providers. So fake pics in themselves not proof whether a provider is the real deal or not. And, of course the answer is no – TER does not run a Tineye check on pix in an ad. That's why you still need to do your own homework.

draginballs - was it girl in pic???

certainly don't use tineye to check out the photos for every lady that gets reviewed.

Her one reviewer has decent history so there is little reason for them to question this.

In cases like this you could contact the reviewer, admin or both.

Isn't this where the Real Photo and Photo Accurate fields come into play?  Perhaps Real Photo - No , Photo Accurate - Yes could work when it is not a real pic but the girl you meet resembles the girl in the pic.  If the review reflected this, it gives TER members a chance to evaluate the amount of risk involved in seeing the girl - "Hmm, this guy says she's not using real pictures but that she resembles the girl in the pic."  Guys who're comfortable with that can go ahead and assess her actual performance, per the review.  Others who have stricter standards might decide that any deception is too much for them, and take a pass.  Or the reviewer might have assumed that it was a very photoshopped pic of the gal (in which case the fields could've been Real Photo - Yes, Photo Accurate - No).  Bottom line, there's only rough guidelines provided for how to submit a review; as always, do all your research and don't just go by the review.

I went to see Ashley in Laurel today who was doing doubles with Candi. Reviews said it was a real picture  but it 2 girls I've seen years ago. She looks nothing like the pictures and they are no where near accurate. I turned around and walked out as drugs/pregnancy haven't done them any compliments.