Washington DC

Angles, lighting, make-upred_smile
IndustryObserver 2837 reads
posted

The new pic is definitely hotter, but if you look at the second BP pic and compare to the new one, you will see the resemblence...the nose knows...

MY INFO

Age
24

Hair
Black

Eyes
Brown

Height
5'5

Weight
114

Donation:
300/hr
450/1.5hr

Appointments:
Tel: (862) 763-8574 or (813) 253-9907
Email: [email protected]

Reviews: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=140439

MY INFO

Age
22

Hair
Brown

Eyes
Brown

Height
5’1

Weight
115

Donation:
300/hr
450/1.5hr

Appointments:
Tel: (862) 763-8574 or (813) 253-9907
Email: [email protected]

Reviews: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=140301

onemoreobservation1530 reads

Is this the same woman who was Victoria Von Dutch before?  I saw her as a blonde and her pics were accurate.  Is this a new person with the same name?  This does not look like the woman who has been visiting.

Very disappointing.

Of Course I am an alias, I don't want to get blackballed!

Seriously, WTF is going on?  The pic they're advertising in their add and the chic on the home page, the one they've been using for months as Victoria (second from the left)  http://www.elitegirlfriendsclub.com/Site/Welcome.html aren't the same gal.

They've updated the homepage since I posted the link. It now matches the pic that they're using in the add.  Still, doesn't look like the same gal they were previously advertising.  Still seems fishy...

You obviously have never seen victoria Von Dutch and hide behind an alias for the simple fact that you have nothing better to do with your time.

Victoria Von Dutch has never been a blonde and is still the same person as before. If it was a new person we would not use the same name. She took new pictures of herself, period.

I know you will come back with something else and expect another reply, but you my dear will just be wasting more of your time.

onemoreobservation1674 reads

I guess she was never a blonde.  My memory is going bad.  But this is what she looked like when I saw her and this is not what your new pics look like.  The difference is what made me comment in the first place.  

Frankly, I think she is pretty hot as she is so the doctored pics, in my opinion, are a disservice.

I don't want to give you a hard time.  I just don't understand why the pics can't be accurate.  I just think truth in advertising is better.

Have a good day!!!

IndustryObserver2838 reads

The new pic is definitely hotter, but if you look at the second BP pic and compare to the new one, you will see the resemblence...the nose knows...

After spending some fantastic time with her last night, and as someone who has been waiting awhile to see her I can 100% confirm the above from EGC - she has never been advertised as a blond by them.

And the girl in the ad that is second from the left is Becky Wright, who still has a current bio on their site and is completely different.

I have met her before and there is no sleight of hand going on with the site.

it is her. the image is highly airbrushed and she is loaded with makeup. For some reason, her boobs look bigger too. But it is her.

I have had the pleasure of seeing Victoria several times and it is her.  The previous pics were GND pics and for all of you not knowing she has become a workout freak.  In the last few months what little lbs that didn't need removing are now gone plus that is a make up artist, hair stylist and a pro photographer.  Lay off her I'm not sure of bait and switch pictures but her originals were there for months and no one bitched if there was any photoshopping I haven't experencied it or seen it.  And for all the aliases and busters hating I've seen her and she is that hottttttt...............

Register Now!