Ok, Am I missing something here?

I have always had an inherent suspicion of an escort who has no web site.  If she is serious, she should spend the time to create one.  All the rip-offs on Eros, whom I post occasionally, have no web sites.  Rule:  no TER reviews and no web site, be CAREFUL!

For over a month, I have been running an experiment.  If a traveling escort has an email address, but no web site, and no TER review, I use Google image to find where else her pictures are posted.  Often I have found that the pictures are for the (pick your choice) playmate of the month, model from Model Mayhem, Playboy cyber model, etc., etc.

So I write them an email, and ask, "Are you REALLY the (pick your choice) playmate of the month, model from Model Mayhem, Playboy cyber model, etc., etc. because I would really like to meet you."  

I will give you the results of this experiment in another posting.

But I just wrote Melyssa, " I noticed your very pretty pictures on Eros at http://www.eros-dc.com/files/400832.htm which says you will be in Washington from October 17th - October 21st .  Are you the model Marisa Elise who is posted at http://www.modelmayhem.com/list/43326 ?  If so, I would very much like to meet you." and received, "... She is not that model you sent a link of, but the 2nd and 4th photos are Melyssa herself, as well as the thumbnail as her profile has been authenticated. ..."

So let's see if I understand.  It OK because (a) she is authenticated (shows you what Eros authentication is worth) and (b) only 3 of 5 photographs are fakes.   WTF!!!!!!!

AM I MISSING SOMETHING?????????????

I'm gobsmacked!

but if there is no website, why even consider the lady? There are reputable providers who spend lots of time and effort at building websites, their brand, and establishing an online presence.  If these ladies without websites and things of that sort stop getting booked, they will notice that they are losing out on this site and go back to bp.  It also keeps you safer as a hobbyist. Again, not being rude, just curious why many of you guys even entertain the possibility or risk.

Happy Monday!

Not to mention, there are amateur models on model mayhem that may actually escort, and you could possibly post a ladies real photos and name. Model mayhem doesn't have just big name fashion models, they have ladies who are trying to get out there and get noticed and well, they have to pay the bills too.

Part 1:  As another poster to this thread noted, in my years of Hobbying I've seen three escorts who also had PICs on MM.  And the PICs they used in various advertisings all matched up.  But that's just a side note.

Part 2: I've seen waaaaayyy too many ladies who use fake/altered/doctored/etc/etc/etc PICs.  OR, in summary, reasonble facsimiles.  I would estimate that in 80% of the cases the reasonble facsimiles were reasonble enough to the live version and/or the live version looked better than the reasonable facsimile.  The 20% failure rate is weighted to my early days of inexperience.

With that said, dont get me wrong, I applaud your effort/s and your passion for "accurate" PICs and the need to be careful.  I applaud your current testing method.  As a matter of fact, that's how I've been able to identify several sources of "reasonable facsimile" providers and with these identified sources I have NOT been disappointed ONE time in the looks category.  Performance, that's another story.

However, in the case and point you use I applaud "Melyssa"!  She came clean!  Told you what I believe is the truth.  Cause when I look at PICs 2 and 4 you can clearly see that they are not Marisa Elise.  Which, gives you the opportunity to decide yea or nea based on her real PICs.  Now of course, with that said, if you're gonna use 2 real PICs why even bother with the fakes!?!?  WTF, that makes no sense.  But I charge that to being rookies.

MY bottom line.....I'm here to get laid, this aint "what's my line" which I think is the shows name where you had to guess/determine the persons real identity.  If the "reasonable facsimile" is reasonable or above...I'm in there!!  Her family, friends and others who don't know she's escorting may care whether or not she uses her real PICs...but I could give a fuck as long as she's hot and can fuck.....oops, "provide" good service.  That's where I get pissed off.  A provider can have her REAL PICs posted, even candid shots....yet the service was not worth the visit!  Hell, she could look like and even be Halle Barry but if she can't "perform" like a freak in the sheets then what good has it done that she looks like or could even be Halle Barry!?!?

I Have had sessions like that where I walked away thinking what a waste of beauty!  And I've had sessions where I literally didn't know what the lady looked like till I walked through the door......DAMN!!  She's fine....AND can fuck, ooops, "provide"....go figure!!!!