Washington DC

fake reviewers
Nomoreplay 63 Reviews 769 reads
posted
1 / 18

Who else thinks users that write fake reviews should be banned from TER?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=118510

She hasn't had any activity since 2010, and nothing suggests that she's back either.  So what's this guy's deal?

robsul2004 124 Reviews 297 reads
posted
3 / 18

Could be fake;
but could also be from a regular (he says he's seen her a few times) who posted at her request due to her expressed desire for more recent reviews to get back into the game;
Could also be that she is active, but not using web advertising, or ha sbeen in another area under another name for a while and the reviewer just used the links in the exisitng profile since you have to include a web link to post a review.  She has ample undated ads on other services but the pics are less revealing;
could be he confused her with another Jamie who is active at the current time (coincidently, I came across her Profile and actually added her to my "potential" list earlier today when i was researching another Jamie who is active in ads);  her pics are hot, her old reviews are solid, and one would think her performance has improved with experience since 2010.

I never trust reviews from reviewers with less than 10-15 anyway, so caution is wise.

KnightRider2004 44 Reviews 269 reads
posted
4 / 18

Although it may be a good idea for TER to ban fake reviewers, I don't believe it's applicable in this situation.

I've had the pleasure of seeing this provider several times in the past and have recently been in contact with her so it's reasonable to assume she's been in contact with other locals including the reviewer in question.

Nomoreplay 63 Reviews 195 reads
posted
5 / 18

There are so many possibilities, I am just curious as to what proof you might have to say this review is fake?

He's got 1 review... and it's of a provider that hasn't been active for nearly 2 years.  If he's seen her before why didn't he write a review then?  Seems to me like he weaseled in a review for free VIP membership of an old provider thinking no one would see it.

Posted By: Yokozuna58
How do you know she is not back?

Maybe she is coming back somewhat UTR and has not advertised yet. Maybe this is a friend of hers whom she saw and wanted another review to preclude her official comeback?

There are so many possibilities, I am just curious as to what proof you might have to say this review is fake?

Given the circumstances (no reviews since 2010), is this suspicious? Yes.

Is this fake? Not enough information to determine that.

BTW, IF it is determined that the review is fake then YES, I agree with you, he should be banned.

db911 34 Reviews 185 reads
posted
6 / 18

I agree with KightRider2004.  She is an UTR outcall type and still active recently.

no_email 3 Reviews 192 reads
posted
7 / 18

She gets some publicity out of this, but she is no longer UTR.

Not that she was completley UTR.

Nomoreplay 63 Reviews 204 reads
posted
8 / 18

My thoughts exactly, if she's UTR, she shouldn't have reviews written about her either.

viennaman7 18 Reviews 287 reads
posted
9 / 18

Whoever 59DOMEhead either did a lazy copy/paste or definitely did not see Sasha/Sasha Lee.  Nothing accurate about that review, from location to services provided.

db911 34 Reviews 184 reads
posted
10 / 18

should?  really?  who decides the UTR rules?

Posted By: kimberluvr
My thoughts exactly, if she's UTR, she shouldn't have reviews written about her either.

jaylovesvag 141 reads
posted
12 / 18

For what it's worth, I saw Jamie regularly when she was advertising and she recently was doing a bit of UTR providing.

JustLayingLow 145 reads
posted
13 / 18

Posted By: viennaman7
Whoever 59DOMEhead either did a lazy copy/paste or definitely did not see Sasha/Sasha Lee.  Nothing accurate about that review, from location to services provided.

DCdaytimer 175 reads
posted
14 / 18

would seem to me that she is still in the business if her ad is posted on cityvibe.

Nomoreplay 63 Reviews 349 reads
posted
15 / 18

"shouldn't", and I think the term "under the radar" kind of gives it away, it doesn't have to be a UTR rule, it's just kind of obvious.

Posted By: db911
should?  really?  who decides the UTR rules?
Posted By: kimberluvr
My thoughts exactly, if she's UTR, she shouldn't have reviews written about her either.

Nomoreplay 63 Reviews 185 reads
posted
16 / 18

People, I don't care who she sees or how UTR she is.  My point is don't write fake reviews, the majority of us are honest with our reviews and want to keep this hobby safe.  That review is obviously fake and he should be banned from this site, this compromises the provider as well as us; I'm just looking out for everybody.

Captain Midnight 35 Reviews 160 reads
posted
17 / 18

That doesn't make it "obvious" that it's a faked review.  Worthy of suspicion?  Yes.  POTENTIALLY fake?  Yes.

Several people here have reported seeing the same lady under conditions where she might not be regularly advertising, and it's possible that she's getting back into the business gradually.  I've occasionally had an old email address turn out to still be good, and once I even met up with someone who was needing a little extra cash to get through a rough patch.  It's possible that this is a similar situation, and if she has experience with being reviewed here, then it shouldn't come as a huge surprise that lo and behold, someone wrote a review.

I have to agree with the folks that say to accord that individual review very little weight, but it isn't an absolute cast-iron fake beyond a shadow of a doubt.  This community consists of people who provide opinions, some of which are worthwhile opinions, and some of which aren't worth the electrons they are printed on.  Part of the maturation process is figuring out whose reviews are trustworthy, and whose are not.

subliminaljoe 11 Reviews 148 reads
posted
18 / 18

Just saying...but dont mind me, I only have 6 reviews ;)

Register Now!