Texted her a few weeks ago hoping to set up an incall based on her TS4Rent ad. She responded telling me she no longer sees clients in person and offered a FaceTime session. A little annoying that she has an ad up indicating a service she doesn’t provide. But doesn’t rise to the level of a negative review, IMO. Just wanted to let anybody know who may be hoping to schedule an in-person with her. FYI

She was on my to-do list.
I honestly don't get the appeal of this Facetime or OnlyFans crap (one of the guys here called the latter "OnlyFools" - lol.)  I guess seeing Aspen on FT one-on-one is a little bit special, but there's lots of great vids all over the porn websites (though I'd say her acting skills are mediocre to poor ... not that I'm expecting much from porn people.)
I suppose one could click "REPORT PROFILE" and complain that she doesn't actually meet clients, but I doubt that ts4rent would stop taking her fees over it.
Idea (not that I expect it to happen) I'd be nice if TER profiles had a field like "Meets electronically:" with yes/no/only checkboxes - I'd skip any profiles that said "Meets electronically: only" checked off.
Lots of tasty choices in LV!  I've got quite a jones for CaliforniaCutey.

and I contacted her to set up a meeting. She required a selfie and some other info that I wasn't going to send over so I didn't get to meet her.  That was only 5 months ago so her "virtual only" must be a new thing.

Surprising...saw her in Feb

Do it!  She has a kinky edge, is versatile, playful, functional and conversational. Nice proportional physical measurements too. Priced reasonable.

based on her photos, she looks like she gained a lot of weight.  

There is a new review posted for Aspen.

So maybe this business of "telling me she no longer sees clients in person" was a passing phase, or a mood of the day.

She does require a photo, which I provided. Maybe she just didn’t like me? If so, it’s understandable that she would give a reason that discourages repeat attempts. I have no issue with that. No doubt she’s in a position that she can be picky about who she sees.

As always many things in this biz are YMMV. If a provider things you're attractive they're probably going to be more into it and you're going to have a better time. This is a no brainer. There are way fewer TS women than cis women. These women are relatively rare and can afford to be picky.  
.
I've noticed there is one reviewer who consistently gives poor reviews to otherwise highly rated TS providers. There is a general theme to these reviews. There are phrases like "she was disgusted by me" or "She wasn't into it" and it becomes pretty clear there is a consistent issue with this one reviewer.