Transsexual

TS Patricia.......................??
LATSDog 2037 reads
posted

Ok, there has been lots of chatter regarding this provider.  You be the analyst.......

http://ts.cityvibe.com/index.php?do=view&p=6183

Amazing pics in that ad. Would anyone say they are average?  I would think not.

The most recent review, she gets a 10/10 looks and performance but he writes that she is not the most attractive? How does that happen?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=912629

But here is another review with the correct rating, I don't get it? Pics don't match the person in the room?????

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=911251

LATSDog1075 reads

GOOD for you, you go!!!!!  I hope you had on your LATSDog Nikie Air's that made you run really fast?

tstest1254 reads

In response to the other post below the person I met only resembled the picture in that it was a human.  As far as looks/sex appeal? No way near the photo and I can't stand that someone would misrepresent themselves like that.

All I can say is that tastes differ.

I wrote one of her reviews (8/6), and I was honest in my review (I thought she was hot looking, but that she didn't really look like her photos).  Some people here hae expressed the opinion that if the girl doesn't match the photos, run away.  That doesn't work for me for a couple of reasons:

1) I don't really expect the photos to be accurate.  Good photos, done by a professional in a studio, ARE going to present the subject in the best light possible; a hotel room with closed curtains and light from a TV screen, won't.  I usually make a point of turning on more light, but there are limits.  I could spend an hour writing reasons why providers should use accurage photos, let's be honest here:  All TS girls are what they are because they were unhappy with how they were born; at one level or another, they all have body image issues.  That isn't the end of the world, but it doesn't surprise me that they want photos that represent how they see themselves, not how they actually look today.

2) I have limits on my opportunities.  Yes, I live near a big metropolitan area with lots of providers, but due to the regional transportation picture, 75-80% of the providers are beyond my personal range.  Sometimes weeks go by without a local provider, sometimes there's a plethora of them.  There's only one well-reviewed provider who's based in my area, and (unfortunately) she doesn't light my spark.  In my case, beggers can't afford to be overly choosy.

3) To quote Robert Heinlein, "sure the game's rigged, but if you don't bet, you can't win."  The best two experiences I've had in this hobby, were ones that involved too much futzing around to get started.  One girl pushed back the start time several hours, because she was trying to get the hotel to clean the room before I got there.  Another was forced to switch hotels and forgot her condoms during the switch, so she asked me to pick some up when I called to say I had arrived.  In both cases, the smart money would have said run -- and would have missed out on some wonderful experiences.

4) I don't expect the reviews to reflect my needs; my needs are my needs, and you probably have different needs.  As an example, with the current reviewing system, I can't give a review that will get a 10 without lying, because I don't do DFK myself, regardless of whether or not the provider will.  Sometimes I don't write a review (or the review gets rejected) because some parts of the experience were so irritating that it taints the overall review, even though the sex was good.  Sometimes I write the review, but it gets rejected because the girl doesn't have a permanent website, and her ad is gone before the moderators can approve the review.

So again, tastes differ, and reviewers have different standards.  You won't know what she's really like until the end of the session, and you still might have caught her on a bad day.

And I should mention that last week I *didn't* have an experience with a well-known, well-reviewed provider, because the provider wanted to give me detailed driving directions *in an area that she was admittedly unexperienced with* in rush hour, in the rain.  I spent 30 minutes driving around in horribly bad traffic all because she wasn't comfortable giving me the name of her hotel over the phone.  She got frustrated, I got frustrated, we both wasted our time -- no one was happy.  I understand that the provider needs to feel comfortable with her situation and her clients, but so does the hobbyist.

As a contrast, Patricia was much easier to connect with and visit, even if she wasn't exactly 'as advertised'.

tsCAT991447 reads

For crying out loud......

How many idiots does it take to be screwed out of the roses?

Doesn't resemble her pictures?  Jesus, I'm not so blind that I can't tell a Playboy Playmate when I see one.

Read all about it here:  http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=49334&boardID=19&page=4

She's laughing all the way to the bank......






-- Modified on 10/22/2009 2:26:32 PM

Register Now!