Transsexual

phony reviews
Assjamer 23188 reads
posted
1 / 20

TS Kayla's reviews are suspect. How to you transform a 2 to a 10. All reviews a first timers. Beware of anyone with only one review. I have been Ripped OFF once.

dan90017 2 Reviews 20361 reads
posted
2 / 20

Good point.  Here's a question:  Is Kayla Coxxx the same person as Lexx Parker on eros-la men?

wantats 128 Reviews 18502 reads
posted
3 / 20

What a find a 21 year old southern porn star with the same xx in the name and the same phone number that is listed on her web site. How funny!
http://www.eros-la.com/files/la-parker3.htm

Assjamer 20267 reads
posted
4 / 20

Excellent work! Sherlock Homes would be proud tell Lexx aka Kayla to make up her?his mind or advertise as a TV no TS here
She give the real girls a bad name and confuses the newbies.

vogliofarti 4 Reviews 20387 reads
posted
5 / 20

I"V also seen a porno with India from La. as a guy(not a good looking one either! sorry cant help with the movie tittles ., i was over this other provider's place and she showed to me., so i assume most of India's reviews are fake, since they all talk about  how beautiful and better looking than a woman., at least Kayla does look good as a guy., India with no make up  is  a scary thing to look at!   they should advertise as tv's i agree with that.   they really do give transsexuals a bad name.

tamimonroe 25852 reads
posted
6 / 20

thats right sherlock holmes!  geeze, u pro tricks really seem to amaze me... dont hate   congradulate!      

LALALand 21722 reads
posted
7 / 20

Okay Tami, so if Kayla AND Lexx are both your room-mates, which one are you banging?  Inquiring minds want to know!

dan90017 2 Reviews 17479 reads
posted
8 / 20

Sorry if you took offense Tami, I was simply making an observation.  But I'm glad to hear that I'm a "pro" at something.  Peace out!

mountP 18871 reads
posted
9 / 20

What the hell happened to truth in advetising. I don't mind rewarding good service with $$$ and gifts. Rip me off and I will make it my mission to run you out of town. We are all adults here. I treat everyonre with kindness, honesty and respect give me that same courtesy.

kdog50 2 Reviews 18923 reads
posted
10 / 20

Hi- I just have two questions regarding assjammer's doubt of my (and others') review(s) of Kayla. I apologize in advance for taking up anyone's time.

Question 1: So when you posted your first review, assjammer, and when everyone else posted their first reviews, should we all just assume those are false? Were they all "plants" by the evildoers that promote escorts on a regular basis, while not out covering up other international conspiracies? I was just reading your reviews and I noticed that you... oh- sorry- that's right- you haven't posted any. sorry. never mind.

Question 2: When you look at Kayla's reviews you see five good reviews and one bad review... by Caktus, a guy who hasn't posted since. Admittedly- he did a lot of reviews prior to dissapearing, but why did he dissappear? (perhaps the same evildoers somehow got hold of him) Is it possible, "ladies" and gentlemen of the jury, even the slightest bit possible that Caktus might have sour grapes, or Kayla was just having an off night? If you find this evidence to produce sufficient doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.

dan90017 2 Reviews 19936 reads
posted
11 / 20

Wow, seems like we've really started something.  I don't doubt your review kdog and assjammer may not have been talking about you, but who knows.  This discussion just shows why "YMMV" always applies.

I think the problem people have with Kayla (not with you) is her constant self-promotion is far above what anyone else does so it somehow grates on folks, she is extremely defensive and now it appears that she's a part-time TV, not a TS as advertised.  That's maybe a small distinction to some, a bigger deal to others.

I think the well worn habit of girls changing their "names" to try and get out from under bad reviews is just as objectionable as any false advertising.  That's my pet peeve.  Maybe girls who have changed their handles want to disagree, that's okay with me.  Peace to all!

wantats 128 Reviews 18611 reads
posted
12 / 20

Why would anyone put in one review? Granted I am a slow typist but I managed to put in two my first time. Two is the magic number so that I could read the reviews in the VIP section. With only one review, I would have had to pay the $20 to become a VIP member. I was just too cheap to do that. The only reason for having only one review is that you don't need the second review (especially when you have one that you didn't post) because you can read the reviews under a different user name. This leads me to the question...why the different user names?
I am sure that now alot of the reviewers are going to start having 2 reviews. Eventually we won't be able to trust anything that we read and that's a shame for both the providers and the hobbyists (pros or not.)

-- Modified on 8/2/2002 2:51:45 PM

Assjamer 19208 reads
posted
13 / 20

Didn't you know that some of us use alias's I have a total of 16 reviews posted on this  site. I will gladly share my real handle with legitimate hobbiests. Bottom line Kayla is a crossdresser posing as a transexual. Case closed!

PETERDRAGON 28 Reviews 17894 reads
posted
15 / 20

You have to think why people might put in fake reviews.  Self review, gaining VIP access to TER, one girl trashing another are a few.  I'm sure there are more.  The one I am most concerned about is the first (self review).  So I look at reviews with overall credibility in mind.

I judge reviewer credibility by looking at the following:
- one review ever, only review of the girl, outstanding marks - almost no cred (classic self review)
- one review ever, multiple reviews of the girl, reviewer is out of sync with other reviews of same girl - zero cred (self review, pulling up the ratings)
- multiple reviews, out of sync with other reviewers, low cred (probably legit, just has low expectations)
- multiple reviews, in sync with other reviewers, high cred (a hobbiest I will follow!)
- one review ever, mediocre or lower review - good cred (legit reviewer - why self review low???

also, look at the "juicy details".  If it points out no flaws or dislikes then its more likely to be a self-review.  

Pete

Assjamer 19609 reads
posted
16 / 20

good points, much wisdom in your words

tamimonroe 19120 reads
posted
17 / 20

Beware of phony posts by ugly, jealous men in wigs!!!

tamimonroe 19203 reads
posted
18 / 20
tamimonroe 19180 reads
posted
19 / 20

STOP POSTING UNDER MY NAME, TVKayla/Lexx!!!

Girl Next Door 18663 reads
posted
20 / 20

Please write to me and/or Staff, so that we can sort this out.

Register Now!