TS Lunar is by far one of the worst. Real Phoney

Thanks for providing this public service.  The fact that Mia Isabella has ANY review from "tweed0246" shocks me, the original Tweed0246, because I've NEVER written a review about ANYONE!  (Sorry about that.) "tweed0246" is obviously an imposter and is probably Wilber/John - Mia's gadfly.  As my first session with Mia was concluding, she and I talked about reviews and I told her, to her slight disappointment, that I wouldn't write a review.  That said, I will reiterate - my 3 sessions with her have been excellent!  Money well-spent and she never asked for the money, nor did she watch the clock.  We went WAY over time and she only charged me for an hour.  A total sweetheart and what a looker!

TS Tempted: That is a great picture of Kelly isn't it? That's what drew me to see her. I'm not sure if it's that my millage varied, her meds that ran out, or the other reviews weren't accurate, but after you see her I'll read your review with great interest.

Here is TS Lunar and my post on him. Without a doubt a true nutcake.

Thanks hueyrotorhead for your confirmation on Lunar.  

No offense to methuselah but I decided to drop Electra/Kelly from the list.  She does have a number of good reviews including a recent one from another apparently legitimate source.  Methuselah is also a reliable and frequent contributor to this board so I take him at his word.  His experience with Kelly was clearly awful and unfortunate and he should be thanked for posting a detailed review with this information.  His experience was obviously much more than YMMV…

It also seems that there is a preponderance of discussion on Mia Isabella such that everyone should be able to draw their own conclusions, so I have continued to leave her off the list as well because she also seems to have her supporters and a number of very good legitimate reviews.


Beyond YMMV

There are many profiles of both GG’s and TS’s where the reviews run from good/great to average or maybe even the occasional poor review.  Generally when you read these reviews there just was something off or there was just not any ‘click’ between the two that day, i.e. ‘YMMV’.  However, I think we need another term to describe the type of experience like methuselah’s experience with Kelly or wilbur21 and luvshungshemales with Mia Isabella.  There is such a huge disconnect or inconsistency that something much more is taking place than just ‘YMMV’.  It almost seems like they are dealing with two different providers.  This information is important because it allows others to understand that there may be some issues/risks with these ladies and these experiences should be weighed in deciding to book an appointment.

Let’s face it, this is a high stress business.  The day-to-day reality is that these ladies have to deal with assault, robbery, harassment, STD’s and lots of people who want something for nothing.  Not to mention hormonal swings from their treatment regimens (and you think GG’s have it bad…).  Even if they are not on other psychoactive prescription or recreational drugs, they’ve got their own personal problems too just like the rest of us.  People have bad days and do stupid things.  

I also think it is commendable that this information is made available in reviews and posts as a form of feedback so that the ladies can also learn from these experiences.  For example, Mia perhaps should take away that she should treat new clients or even people that she does not intend to see with more respect when scheduling appointments – what can that cost her and won’t it only help her in the long run?  Kelly should probably take away that no matter how bad she may need the work, if she is uncomfortable for some reason she will be much better off in the long run when she refunds an honorarium and turns a client away than trying to muddle through a bad experience.  Clients need to remember to be respectful in these instances as well, more than likely it may not even have anything to do with them.

Again, I want us to be able to distinguish from consistently poor reviews with bad providers as opposed to cases of extreme YMMV or out-of-character inconsistencies.  Just so you know that I am not completely without a few suggestions how about:

‘PMSE” for those ‘pre-menstrual syndrome experiences’
‘WSOTB’ for got up on the ‘wrong side of the bed’ that day?
‘TPS’ for ‘the perfect storm’ experience
‘OHM’ for ‘off her/his meds’

So, come on, I know you guys can be very clever.  So doesn’t anyone have any better suggestions that we can adopt for a short hand way to describe the type of experience or inconsistency that is beyond YMMV for an otherwise well reviewed and respected provider?

Regards,

TS Tempted

My review of her is posted.  The pictures are accirate. unfortunately my experience was far different than the first reviewer.

Thanks zoofly for the recon but so sorry you had to TOFTT:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=548580&user=277992

Here’s a real stinker on TS Claudia/Ana (thanks WS):

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=549181&user=196653

You think rebaha might do a little search on good ‘ol TER before next time?

-- Modified on 11/21/2006 10:09:13 PM