Yup, she should have been honest. That's a bummer. This is the type of shit that makes it tough on the legit ladies with good reviews.

I think we all agree that they should let us know, and as the dog says, there are the good ones, and lets not forget Ms Samantha Duvalle in the valley, one of the good ones.

Speaking strictly for myself, if I want to see a provider without that "special extra piece of equipment," I'd see a genetic female (which I have done). To my mind, advertising as a TS but not indicating that you are post-op is fraud. You *are* a TS, and deserve to advertise as what you are, but I'm not the only guy who prefers a pre-op to a post-op. (You also run the risk of being subjected to violence, if the client has a temper and feels that he's been tricked. Mix in a little latent homophobia and you're running a real risk of shopping for coffins online at Amazon.com.)

On the other hand, who are we going to report it to, anyway? I'm sure the cops would be *thrilled* to get a complaint from a hobbyist ("john") that the provider ("prostitute") had misrepresented herself. Yeah, right. That's what these frauds count on, and it's up to us to handle it "within the family."