hey sweetheart,
your link only goes to photogm's reviews, so I'm not sure who you're comparing him to, but...I just read his reviews of the handful of girls we've both seen and not only am I impressed with the stringency with which he guards any rating above a 7, if you read the narrative you'll see his 7's and even his 6's describe activities and services well worth repeating.

I see much more of a problem with the syncophants who toss about 8's, 9's and even repeated 10's and then describe encounters only minutely superior to those which here garner mere 6's and 7's. I, for one, look forward to photogm's first 9 -- now THAT will be a provider more worthy of a visit than many of the faux "10"'s currently cluttering the works !

I have to disagree with you on who gets better service.  I think Photo is a little tough on his scores on the "juicy details". On seeing Ariel, he only gives her a 7 but writes "she's a keeper". On Christy Delight a 7 also but writes "I will be back". on Karen, only a 6 but writes "she's the best". He only gave Kayla a 5,but she hasn't been reviewed in the last 20 months. He gives Christina only a 6 but says he will see her again. Megan has only 3 reviews two 7's and a 6. This year Savannah has all 6 and 7's with one 9. Ivy has mostly 6 and 7's with a couple of 10's. on Sonya, he only gave her a 5 but wrote "it was sexy'. He only gave her a 6 on the looks but wrote "Wow".Marina does have all 8's but he seemed to be right on targe with Lisa. He gave Rachel a low score but also said her pics were deceiving.
If you read ladudes reviews, most of the providers he has seen, have been appointmensts he made an hour or so after he called them.
Highend, you once wrote you had 18 phone calls in one day, but only had one appointment. Maybe these gals were happy to see some one so quickly and gave a better performance themselves.
Like I said in the beginning, I think Photo is a little tough on the scores .
Highend, youv'e read his reviews why do you think he receives a poor performance?