I have read quite a few TS provider reviews recently that make no mention of the providers approximate cock size. As a  hobbyist I think it is an important detail and should not be left out of a review. It would be like leaving out the size of a gg providers breasts or her age. Please add your thoughts

thank you for TER Reviews are VIP

Rif, you and I have traded info on tgirls before. In my experiences, not including cock size usually means it is small. I have seen several over the years where that happened. It is bad enough when they exaggerate their size, or say they are functional when they aren't. So I'd be wary of tgirls who don't give that info.

I agree a 100%. If anybody is sending a review it would be helpful to mention the cock size which is very important to make a decision, because size really matters to me.

Absolutely!  Maybe there should be a place in the form for this.  Also, whether they are "cut" or not, and if they are really functional and if they cum.  All the above is of great importance to those interested in the TS provider.

I believe this is one of multiple changes which should take place with the review form for not just TGirls, but Mistresses, Slaves, Escort, etc.

I love TER. It has saved me mucho $$,$$$ over the years and has contributed to my physical and emotional well being. When TER started out it was completely logical to use one form (One Size Fits All). However, with the sophisticated hobbist which TER has provided the means to mature the time has arrived for a review form specific to each category of provider.

Question Specific
Non Repetitious
Input Solicited
Sensitive to Update (Which is it, BBBJ or CBJ? One or Two Pops?)

TER, it's 2004 don't you think it is time to distance yourself from the pack?

Agree whole-heartedly with the need for a different format for TSladies. It's kind of hard to characterize the pussy type of a 9" x 5-1/2" (circ) cock among other things. . .