After reading through many reviews and wanting to visit with some of the hotter TS such as Rachel in Tamp, Ana in Miami and a couple of others that come to mind. I've kind of noticed that you take a big risk when visiting the sub-25 generation. It seems that the over 25 TS who have been around awhile, provide a more consistent experience. Where the younger ones appear to have un-even reviews.

Anybody else see this trend?

I kind provide a longer list if anyone is interested. You can read the reviews for yourself and be the judge.

-- Modified on 9/10/2006 5:02:12 PM

I agree. "Dynamic Instability" is a HUGE issue with the "under-25" TS girls. Consistency is a very big problem.

IMHO you are better off with RATED providers who have demonstrated consistency of performance over a reasonable period of time. This will usually mean someone between the ages of 26-30.

As residents of the board will attest, my "experiences" with under-25 providers have not been the best....LOL

TA

Do you find you get better service from the older, professional waiter at that fancy French restaurant than you do from the 18 year old at McDonalds?

Personally, I don't think this has anything to do with TS, escort, or gender issues at all.

It's just called life.  Younger people generally tend to be more flaky, immature, have attitudes, etc.  Yes, there are exceptions, but I wouldn't make this into a TS issue.

If you are an older gentleman you should just realize that's part of life and let it roll.

I disagree with Star on one point, this is a (TS issue). The younger the TS the closer it is to the time that a life changing decision was made that changed their life. Most of the TS community did not make the physical and lifestyle change until their teens or earily 20's. At that point instead of learning how to live a lifestyle from childhood they had just a few months to get use to a change. I'm am not an expert on being a TS, but thinking and planning something is a lot easier than doing it. I would think the older the TS gets the more they are ajusted to their lifestyle change. I do not concider the TS community the same as the majority community. That is not a good thing or a bad thing to me, it is just the way it is.

I have to agree with Star. You can't be gender specific when it comes to flakiness, immaturity, etc. The younger you are the more unstable your personality is. Whether you are TS, male or female
most everyone is "young, dumb and full of cum"! As you age, you gain more life experiences that permanently set your personality traits. Not everyone loses their flakiness, either. Especially if you are dealing with a drug addict!

I'm with Allenp on this one. I'll also throw in another 2 cents as well. There just aren't that many TS providers out there, and their number pales in comparison to GG's. Whenever a new TS pops up on the scene, we all rush to experience her and this creates for a big ego pretty fast. To achieve such whole-scale success in your chosen career at such an early age really messes with one's head. I've spent time with both 22 year-old TS's and GG's and found that the GG's realize that the competition is fierce, so they're more willing to be nice so that you become a regular. In my experiences, the more "emotionally mature" providers understand that it's a business and welcome regulars, as there's less of a fear factor.

My best experiences have been with older TS Escorts... they seem to have lost the "attitude".. worst experience ever was with a famous young TS Star in Baltimore... no names mentioned ... they scam you

Your data analysis is questionable as it does not establish a clear cause and effect.  It's possible by the sheer professional longevity of older providers is due to the fact that from the start they were superior providers with less 'issues' and that is why they are succcessful and appear to have less 'issues' when older.  I'm certain you can find a body of reviews for older providers new to the scene that contain inconsistency.  I also believe some providers reviewed lie about their age and the trend is downward, not upward thus further invalidating the data collected.  I have been with two whom openly admitted to me that their advertised age is a fabrication.  A third problem with your data collection lies in selection bias.  It is possible most reviewers only write reviews for experiences that fall on the extremes of a scale either positive or negative.  If you look at the reviews generally you find the majority positive, some glaringly negative, but the least in the trend are average.  This is of course a statistical impossiblility because scale based reviews as an entire body of data will show a trend of  'average' both as a mathmatical function and a median if the sampling method is valid.

Rickster33, Interesting observation on the competition thing with GGs. You may be onto something here. I say that because now that you mention it, I do see a difference in places where there is a lot of TS competition like LA or NYC. The TS girls there appear to not be as flaky and do appear to want to please.

-- Modified on 9/10/2006 5:02:38 PM

Boy, was I off base!! I thought we were talking about emotions and feelings not a Math problem. All that College and I missed the part on how to measure feelings statistically. I always knew that I drank to much in school!!

"All that college" and you may have missed more than Statistics 101.  Your emotions start at a data collection level.  For you to 'feel' a certain way about someone, they have to 'do' something that you analyze that stimulates that 'feeling'.  So yes, in a sense this entire post is about statistics as the original poster is generating an aproximate average to create a generalization about the age of providers and 'issues' they have.  I just look at the data he sites for his reasoning and see different possible conclusions.  

I will admit that statistics are used in crime profiling and that also is dealing with human behavior. If it turns out I am wrong I can always blame Budwiser. By the way, I hope no one says I am comparing being a TS with being a Criminal. I am just discussing human behaivor and Satistics. I called a friend in Kansas City that is a profiler for the State Police and she tends to lean toward Horizononfire's view of this subject. Well, I'll have another Bud and think it over.

Spock? Is that you? Welcome back from Vulcan.

-- Modified on 9/10/2006 5:02:52 PM

I have found that the younger the men are the more difficult they make the session. Men over 30 have good manners are more relaxed. If I can detect from the voice on the phone that someone is under 30 I shy away from the appointment all together.

-- Modified on 5/30/2005 8:39:31 AM

After seeing your picture the news is good for me!! I'm way over 30.

A limited number of phenotypes, Captain.  Despite the constellation of different genetic, neuroendocrinological, and enviornmental factors that influence individual behavior, there is only a small number of potential human responses to a given situation.

Despite your home base LA, a near continent away from me this is a misfortune.  I think I do not fit your under 30 stereotype at all.  I'm so chillin' like a villain, that rarely do I make sexual demands on providers even.  

Bone structure, eyes, lips, and ears to die for, you shame the Mona Lisa.  If you find your travels take you to Boston, I'll telephone you with my best AARP card bearing member impersonation in the hopes I'm deemed worthy.