I visited Crystal after seeing this same ad. She looked nothing like this...more of a man in a wig with lots of makeup.

and one of the tell tales is pic number 3. When one area of the picture, in this case, the cute sign, is way whiter then other areas of the picture that are also white, it's a sign that the picture has been messed around with in photoshop.

The overall blurriness the rest of them kind of speaks for itself.

Well if the issuer of the ad paid for it in real money it's a genuine (real) ad even though he/she is misrepresenting him/herself with altered or stolen pics. That's how I look at it.

The ad is genuine. It is the photos that are fake.  Was she well hung? :>)

How can an ad be genuine when the pics are fake?

By chance, is this the same person?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=145620

Did you do it to the man in the wig with lots of makeup on?

No, that's Josie from Texas.  She doesn't need to fake her photos.  :>)

You analyze the validity of tgirl ads based on the fact that you think they created it and paid for the ad?

I don't understand the logic myself.  In addition, refrencing the provider in the link I provided above.....  She doesn't need fake photos?  Did you see her in person?  I did not see your review?  She has 5 reviews total and 4 of them are rated very low.  

Do you think she placed her ad or did someone do it for her?  

It's amazing how many fake ads are on both Backpage and Eros.  What is the deal with this?  Now, so many are using links to sites with photos of other ladies.  What a scam!!!

If Eros tried to clean up the fakies on their site, they would recognize a huge loss in revenue dollars, so they just turn their head the other way and collect the monthly fee for having an ad on their site that is fake.

Re TS Josie aka Rachel Novarro is NOT the gurl in the opening post of this thread.   And I stated she has no need to fake her photos.   512-317-7370
http://www.myproviderguide.com/escorts/killeen/free-posts/trsg/3160364.html  & http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=145620+512-317-7370&ct=clnk' target=_blank>http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1R2RNWO_enUS328&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=2719l15672l0l16782l11l8l0l0l0l1l344l1157l3.4.0.1l8l0&q=cache:rPWCNI3FfWQJ:http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=145620+512-317-7370&ct=clnk   The guys found fault with her performance NOT appearance.  i.e photos NOT faked.  Performance and appearance are 2 different things.  

Hey just one more reason to stick with the girls that have been around a bit, have a a few reveiws, and even their OWN web site. Be careful out there guys!