JPG2k2 recently posted a 10/10 review of Lavinia, which i know is well deserved.  As readers of this forum know she is my ATF.  I just want to point out one issue with the review.  jpg2k2 states "I blow me load deep in her and she takes every last drop."  implying that she swallowed.

I just want to point out that Lavinia only allows her customers to be safe, meaning when things get hot and heavy, a condom is in use. She will allow you to go down on her uncovered if you choose and she is comfortable with you.  We have discussed this quite a bit and I feel comfortable that she is truthful.

I understand that we all like to embellish our reviews a bit here, and that is fine, but when it comes to safety we all need to be upfront so we can make decisions based on what we read.  

This is probably not what everyone wants to hear, but in light of our hobby it seems a wise move on her part.

If you haven't seen her yet, she is in a new apt just outside of Boston.  Worth every dollar you spend.

I've read your post a few times and cannot find the reviewer discrepancy.  You quote the reviewer as saying, "I blow me load deep in her and she takes every last drop."  In response to that you claim, "I just want to point out that Lavinia only allows her customers to be safe, meaning when things get hot and heavy, a condom is in use. She will allow you to go down on her uncovered if you choose and she is comfortable with you.  We have discussed this quite a bit and I feel comfortable that she is truthful."  The only discrepancy lies in your paraphrasing of Lavinia.  If you are to be believed she does not practice a standard of condom exclusive sex as by her own admission she'll let some blow her bare and others not.  She practices a standard of YMMV.  This can be read in her other reviews and other posts regarding her.  For example ssteveowens claims Lavinia forcefully struck him, injuring his ear.  It is doubtful she takes this abusive attitude with all of her clients.  According to ssteveowens, she hadn't even taken it with him before that point and he had seen her multiple times prior.

A more effective method of discrediting the review would be to look for specific contradictions within the text of the review, or the reviewers other reviews and posts.  Instead you make the blanket statement, " I understand that we all like to embellish our reviews a bit here, and that is fine, but when it comes to safety we all need to be upfront so we can make decisions based on what we read."  Do you realize that you have just admitted that you are not objective regarding reviews?  When you say 'we all' you include yourself in the group of embellishers.  Truthfully on this matter you can speak for nobody except yourself and you have just admitted you embellish.  You are trying to rationalize your deceptive practice by claiming 'we all' do it.  If your case scenario is to be believed, then no reviews can be believed.  My reviews are written with 'enthusiasm' not 'embellishment'.

Your affinity for Lavinia and your rush to defend her is honorable.  Unfortunately in summary your objectivity is hampered by poor data collection, unsubstantiated conclusions, and your self-confessed propensity to embellish regarding Lavinia.

is she really as big as she says she is???  if so, maybe ill go and see her

Thank you for the sixth grade grammar lesson.  Perhaps I should have been better with my choice of words.

Neverless, my point was that Lavinia does not allow her clients to go without condoms, nevermind come inside her or in her mouth.  If a client want to take the risk of going down bareback that is their choice.

I will stand by all of my reviews for their accuracy, except for the fact that I might not be a thirty minute porno movie fucking machine like most people seem to be.

every bit!!

As it was said on Seinfeld (modified for the penis) it is real, and it is spectacular

JPG2k2 told us otherwise.  You have yet to discredit him.

And I have to side with GunsGerms+Steel as a grammician and against T_Lover (and even the hobbyist he wishes to debunk) on the issue of Lavinia.  She is simply not performing as well as her reviews --- safe or reckless --- and she actually told me after a miserable rip-off session in September, 'Go ahead and write a bad review if you don't like the service. My reviews are so good it won't matter.'  A strange thing for her to say since she also charmingly asserted I was 'stupid' for not reading her reviews thoroughly.  Sadly, my first 6,000 character torpedo masterpeice doesn't pass the censors (they won't tell me why but happy to share it with anyone who asks), so I had to go with a middle of the road, she's definitely not a ten, kinda review.  If it were up to me she'd be a 6 or 7 and a 2.