I know that YMMV, but I think that TS ASP providers that advertise as "GFE" should back it up, YMMV or not. Yes, you are going to meet some guys you would never date in real life, but who is charging the $$$ here. You should not false advertise services you have no intention of providing, like DFK for example. It only takes a few bad dates for guys like me to go back to seeing GG providers who really are GFE dates. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think the TER definition of A Girl Friend Experience includes DFK and BBBJ. If that is not going to be a part of our date, then you should not be advertising it in you ad. I've taken some chances recently on non reviewed or seldom reviewed providers on EROS that advertised GFE and were not. No more. I will save my coin for the few TS providers that are professional and back up what they say, or just skip the whole thing and go back to seeing GG's.
Unless a person has plenty of roses to give away, seeing well-reviewed girls is always the best policy.
Anyone taking a chance on non-reviewed girls is, well, taking a chance. Nobody is forcing a person to take that chance.
How many times have the Dog and I cautioned people?
By the way, I've read plenty of first-time reviews of GG's that advertised GFE but weren't, so it's not a TS thing. Actually, it's a people-thing, regardless.
If a person has, say, 7 bad experiences out of 10 with a provider, too many say it's the providers who are at fault.
Uh, another way to look at it is: Who chose those 7? Ouch.
I feel for ya on the bad experiences, but I'd choose well-reviewed providers from now on.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
