I am not talking in regards to bad providers.

I'm talking in regards to good provider that ask for privacy.

I personally don't mind a review or two every now an then but when a profile starts getting packed of reviews like sardines that were unsolicited it cuts my ability to give a good natural session because I have to fulfill the expectations of a recent review they read and it also increases my anxiety attacks.  

Now I'm a great provider and sometimes I can't connect with every guy I see as a great provider. While I might of had an awesome time with one gentlemen where I felt we had increasing attraction for each other maybe sucking his c*ck bareback felt good and right at the moment, perhaps savored it. Where I get screwed is if he runs to TER and writes a review, see example why.  

For example:

One reviewer said he took a shower. All of a sudden the hobbyist from TER were demanding a shower as well. I do however provided a shower to business men that have a busy schedule so I completely understand but if you're home why not shower over there ?

Another:
From the same reviewer, now everyone wanted a BBBJ otherwise I would score low in the review and at times it made me feel threatened because their ego might get bruised from rejecting a BBBJ. I don't do BBBJ occasionally but on the rare instances I'll admit I do. Most of the times when I do CBJ is because either I wasn't attracted to him or there was something off that it didn't felt right.  

 
Now going to back to my question:

Why do you guys have the need to rush IMMEDIATELY after a good session and report back on TER after she had a recent well-reviewed and decided add one more when she didn't ask you to ? is it ego ? Or remain VIP status ? And some even thou the session was good some hobbyist even decide knock her out a few points for not providing the exact experience from the 10/10 or 10/9 reviewers when she's asking for privacy in the first place. This isn't a attack on you guys more as to why ? Why the need ? This when reviews start to become a problem and perhaps angered a provider for not keeping it discreet.

It would be kind to ask a good provider if she's review friendly before posting one. While you might feel empowered patronizing a good provider don't forget she also has the power to delist from TER at any point time given. Don't forget a smart cookie knows exactly who's behind that user name even when added things that didn't happen on a review.

-- Modified on 8/14/2017 6:35:43 PM

Bottom line is, although you might be a good provider, there are several girls and TS girls that rip people the hell off.  TER exists so that the hobbyists can at the least have an understanding of what services he will receive during the session and not get ripped off.  I for sure would like to know why I should give anyone $300 plus for an hour of their time.  In your case, you can always disclose to the gentleman that you do not wish for him to give a play by play description of the session or that you not be reviewed period.  99 percent of us just want to know that the provider can be trusted and doesn't have a history of "bad days."  If a client sees that a girl has several reviews, unless she specifies otherwise, he will assume that she wants to be reviewed, again a provider certainly has the right to ask that he review her.  Anything else and I would suggest that you ask guys not to be so detailed in the review.  I make it a point to ask the lady before I leave if she wants a review.  

To answer most of your questions, when I first started, yes it was about getting the VIP.  As I have stayed in the hobbying lifestyle, I just pay for the year so as not to keep worrying about submitting reviews.  Now, I see ladies that I would like to review, so I guess you could say it has become an ego thing.  Also I try to be as honest as possible when reviewing someone, if it sucked then it sucked and thats what I will write, it it was awesome then so on and so on.  As far as scoring goes, yes some will knock scores down and some will also inflate scores, it all evens out.  I guess it more easy to call out the reviewers than it is to call out the robbers, bs providers, bait and switch girls, and ones who provide horrible service.  

 
P.S. If it is about the scores you've received then I wouldn't worry too much about it.  Hobbyist look at other hobbyists profiles and can see who is inflating and who don't score high.  Some guys just grade harder.  Again, I would just suggest that you either ask to not be reviewed or ask that certain stuff not be written because it's more of a YMMV thing.

Great questions -

Q: Why review if the girl already has recent positive reviews?
A: If not in VIP status, it's about getting VIP back.
A: If in VIP status, then it's about layering details. I read reviews all the time that are positive, but really don't give much info. I'm interested in describing the neighborhood, the phone interactions leading to the date, the cleanliness and layout the incall location, etc. I'm of the opinion that I am paying for an experience not just intercourse. A provider that has made the choice to host in a clean comfortable place usually gets extra TLC from me.  
A: If in VIP status, and I don't see much to write about that's new and relevant for the reader, it's all about ego. Please allow me qualify what I mean by ego. In this hobby, unlike any other hobby - I have no way to express myself other than to write a review. This pursuit is a solitary affair. There's no meetup group for guys who regularly see escorts. There's no organized fellowship and public bonding for men who see escorts. While there may be TUMBLR sites or Blogs available, that's not my style. TER is a vehicle for me to articulate and journal my experiences (usually) without judgment.

Q:  Why review if the provider is asking for privacy?
A:  I have never reviewed a good provider who has asked for privacy.  

Q: Why decide to knock her out a few points for not providing the exact experience from the 10/10 or 10/9?  
A: This is a harder question to answer because I think it speaks to 1) the TER rating descriptions, 2) some reviews are misleading, and 3) this is a subjective sort of endeavor all around. I try to make sure the "YMMV" disclaimer gets in my reviews where appropriate because the odds favor that each client is going to have a different experience from the last guy.  

Lastly, I will add that there are some providers I've seen that I will never review out of principle. If the experience was so unusual and atypical, and it was clear that chemistry got the best of us and the provider deviated from her business norms, writing a review describing these deviations just isn't appropriate IMHO.  

Thanks for the questions!

Aren't  all good providers YMMV though? I've made it a positive but to ask every person I see what they chose me as a provider and for regulars I ask why they keep coming back. The most common responses I get are (not in any specific order):

1)I'm hot

2)I have good reviews (generalized. This is kind of included twice because some guys choose not to elaborate)

3)the laid back atmosphere

4)conversation and chemistry

5)review scores/review position

6)skin tone (I'm very uneasy about this one, but for some it's a thing)

Now before I dig into that, I want to mention that at no point has there been anything inflated in my reviews that didn't actually happen. While some people may perceive  the level of something that happened as more of less significant, the point is that it did happen. I don't have a "script" for appointments, but I do make sure I check certain boxes to ensure a top review score should I get a review (I also ask 100% of people to review me).

That box checking is sometimes what leads to me not seeing a person again and why I detest the current "must-do" review system. I have a preference for doing whatever I feel like doing in a session (lately that's been destroying some booty), and that can change from session to session depending on whatever floats my boat that day. I do that because of what seems the most significant feedback I get listed above-chemistry and atmosphere.

You guys want something real, something raw, and something that feels natural, an the only way that can be achieved is if the provider doesn't feel pressured into certain activities. While, in the past, I've had a lot of appointments that, by circumstance, I kind of led whatever happened and there were great outcomes, now I disclose that I'm going to do what I want and the other party doesn't really get a say.  

It sounds like its harsh, but if I'm into it, it's real and I'm into something if I'm doing what I want to do. There's a caveat to that though, which is where I agree with OP. I've gotten a ton of reviews recently that are all me as a top, which is true, but not representative of preference.  

I don't always want to be a top, nor /can/ I always be a top. Hormones are some powerful things and make it an impossibility sometimes (noted in two of my reviews, which I always issue a disclaimer on). I think that skewing of what I do toward being a top puts a lot of unnecessary pressure on me to do that which detract from my sessions being completely organic--some times I want someone to fuck me like the world is gonna end tomorrow ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  

Now what does this all have to do with good providers being YMMV. Well when you're shooting for organic and real, things don't always happen and it's totally ok. An actual GFE--not someone that just does GFE things--prioritized that. Sometimes that's no DFK, only LFK, or no FK. Sometimes that me turning you into a pin cushion, sometimes it's the other way around. It's all situational and very much YMMV and a reliance on what reviews say totally destroys that.

TLR Concur on part, dissent in part. All good providers ARE YMMV and reviews can destroy that. I also like butt stuff.

Nicely put Sir, I guess i'm choosing no review policy.

I would off preferred the client to ask me before posting so I can clarify to him that certain stuff not be written at all because it's more of a YMMV thing. Rather than him just immediately writing every single graphic thing and to finish it off and to boost his ego he writes YMMV in a review, where the provider would be screwed with low rating in the future and the revengeful reviewer will part take on.  

Thanks for your input!