either perform or offer to perform bbfs.
First rule:TOTAL ANONYMITY. THAT MEANS NO NAMES! NONE! NOT EVEN HINTS! -- and that includes all responders getting a fresh unused alias just for their response to this question.  

"Has a provider performed or offered to perform bbfs with you in the past year?"

I bring this up after receiving numerous private messages, IM's and emails with regard to more than a few  'famous' pornstars/providers across the entire country seeming to indicate that this dangerous activity may be becoming much less proscribed. PLEASE: NO NAMES. Don't even hint at who it might be. just a simple "yes, twice" or "no, never" will suffice. You might note whether the provider was a TS or a GG. This is not research to help hobbyists find such providers, so PLEASE NO NAMES! It's more of a wake-up call with regard to what's actually going on. So, please, just tell the truth. And if it's "no", then please, just say "no".  If this becomes anything other than an anonymous anecdotal survey then I will ask that the Moderator immediately remove it. (Hey, leAnswer, if this just seems wrong from the get-go, then drop it.  I was also thinking about going to the "Porn Star" board and asking for anyonymous responses to: "Have you ever been with a TS?", but thought I'd shake things up here first.)

Yes,twice.

Twice. One gg on the third date and one ts on the first. This was out of about twenty providers last year.

no

Once with a tgirl on second date (declined) and a few times with gg providers (accepted).

-- Modified on 1/23/2005 12:03:53 PM

What do you mean by bbfs?

All of the TS's I've seen will do BBBJ, but always covered when it comes to penetration either way

Both have been offered it by many and have always refused. Most will do BBBJTC.

I personally think it is a bad thing when any provider does this.  I'll often mention it to friends that hobby and make them aware.  It is just stupid.  I may have my facts out of order but I believe (wrongly or rightly) that bb anal offers more opportunity for the transmission of life shortening disease and is just plain stupid to engage in with anyone that you aren't 100 % (i.e married to) without a condom.  

Interestingly, I've had GG's offer this with much more regularity than TS's but it has happened at least 3 times in the last 12 months with TS providers.

For the sake of your sample, I will say that I receive BJ's bb from both TS's and GG's so I'm a bit of a hypocrite as I don't count that among the more dangerous lisasons to be had without the aid of protection.  I could be right or wrong but it is a risk I willingly take.

Never full service,neither GG or TS.Oral give and receive many times from both.

I can say from my own experience that i usually prefer not to do BB with TS providers. But i am guilty of 2 times with a provider i am very close with. Also have enjoyed CIM with this provider.For some reason alot of the GG'S I've seen have all wanted BBFS some i have done this with One in particular wanted BB Greek which i did enjoy. I have really not allowed this too happen in the last year it's just too scary out there. I think you have to remember its not just sleeping with the provider but everyone she has had sex with also!

-- Modified on 1/24/2005 10:22:14 AM

One GG provider.  No TS Providers.