Transsexual

Rip Offconfused_smile
Musictalk 2281 reads
posted

Stephanie on ERO's and CL, as a beautiful blonde TS, she was ugly, needed a shave and a bath, couldn't get hard,little penis, had no energy, couldn't take it in the ass, yada, yada.

This isn't the appropriate place to post reviews, especially unsubstanciated ones with little information.  Please read the TOS at the top of the fourm page.

If you truly feel you have something to review about a provider please use the review process which is there to protect both hobbyists and providers from bogus hate reviews and provide legit info.

Have fun, play safe,
TS Jamie

TS Tempted1819 reads

It isn’t worth it.  No offense intended to you and your legitimate concern, but you probably didn’t need to point out the obvious to anyone who has spent any time reading discussion boards like this one.  

Let’s review.  This is Musictalk’s first post (as far as I can tell).  There is no URL, no related link, no photo, absolutely no information that would allow anyone to determine just who Musictalk is trying to warn us about or when this was supposed to have occurred.  At best that makes the post totally useless or at worst bogus.  There are five Stephanie’s currently advertising on Eros in five different cities.  Only two represent themselves to be some form of blonde.  One of those has generally good reviews and if I am not mistaken doubles with a very highly regarded provider so I doubt if it would be her.  The other has a little less information available but musictalk’s experience seems inconsistent with what is known.

I totally agree with you of course.  Musictalk should write this up as a review.  Only then would it contain enough information to make it truly useful and lasting.  Maybe he still will and this was just a timely heads up for the forum.  If he had a bad experience and therefore good intentions about warning the group with his post he should have taken the time to make his message more credible or not wasted his and our time.

Maybe our distinguished moderator meant it as an example – ‘no comment needed’ – and you and I are merely flogging a dead horse…

Regards,

TS Tempted

-- Modified on 5/23/2007 8:20:42 AM

I respectfully disagree with you sweetie.  This post smacks of a hate post in direct violation of the TOS.

It's the second unsubstanciated post in as many days - the other one being the miscommunication with Venus which should have been resolved privately between the parties.

If such posts are unchallenged then this site becomes an infantile free for all like CL and HungAngles and Troothsayer, which just closed by the way, and the quality people leave.

http://main.troothsayer.com/

Just my opinion,
TS Jamie

-- Modified on 5/23/2007 1:32:56 PM

TS Tempted1210 reads

1. a. Long bloomers formerly worn as underwear by women and girls.
    b. Chiefly British Panties.

2. Full breeches gathered and banded just below the knee.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Short for knickerbockers.]

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2003. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

-- Modified on 5/23/2007 3:44:50 PM

But I LOVE sexy white thongs and super short mini skirts.

Giggle,
TS Jamie

TSSometimes1461 reads

super short mini skirts are great...with someone peaking out from below mmmm

I'm going to go out dressed just that way (mini with nothing under) this weekend and take pictures just for you honey!

I'll post them on the web site...

Giggle,
TS Jamie

Gosh you naughty guys are turning me into a reeeally bad girl... somebody spank me pleeeze.

Register Now!