The reveiews are lousy regarding service ratings go.  I'm not VIP to read the reviews but anyone here seen her?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=27570

A lot of the well respected posters here have seen her, and the reviews are justified. Here is a quote from one of them when told a poor review was forthcoming:

"She laughed and said that the reviews don't mean a thing to her. Afterall, I came to see her. She said she has no trouble getting dates despite the reviews.Save your money and don't see her."

Rushed, Terrible Attitude, almost kicked out the door the minute I got there once I handed over the roses.  Hot Hot, but not worth it.  The pics look great and so does she.  Up close however it is very obvious the entire package was purhased via plastic surgery..face is a little too done up if you ask me.

After checking the posted links out of curiousity, I cannot help but be reminded of my earlier posts about some overcharging Diva wannabees who waste our time and money and still think they are worth a nickel. This one is a poster child obviously of what my rants were about.

I would love to hear 1 single TS that posts or reads here try to defend this bullcrap.

Price quotes from her Eros ad:

Cash Only
$400/ INCALL Non-negotiable -no rush!
$500/ OUTCALL
$700/ COUPLES WELCOME

I wason the fence about seeing her tonight and decided not to.  I emailed her last week, still no reply.

I agree that bad service, bad attitude, and over plasticated (surgery wise) does not warrant $400 an hour no matter how attractive.

Thanks again for your feedback, I don't like being on fences...afraid of heights.

getting roses all day to have my dick sucked, I'd always be in a good mood.  LOL!

need I say more!

If she was a cool chick who provided awesome service.  What a shame.

I debated long and hard as to whether or not I should respond to this post. I finally decided I would. I in fact saw Ana a couple of weeks ago when she was visiting my city. I was very undecided about whether to take the risk after the overwhelming # of bad reviews. I decided to go ahead anyway. I have to say I am very happy I did! She is indeed drop dead gorgeous and the time we spent together was very satisfying. I went in to this with a completely open and non-judgmental mind. I was her first appointment upon arriving in town and she was very polite and pleasant on the phone and in person. Our appointment lasted about 45 minutes, including some personal conversation about her home country of Brazil and her family back home. I honestly believe if it wasn't around 12 noon and she had not just arrived in town, she'd have asked me to stay for dinner and or a night cap. I will make, what I feel to be, one very important observation. It is my firm belief, if you are not very attractive and in shape, as well as very polite and treat her with a great deal of respect, you won't have a very satisfying time.I believe the same to be true for some of the GG providers out there, especially the very young and very hot ones. Ana is after all very young and definitely hot herself. Some of you are probably thinking, if she only wants to see good looking in shape guys,she should advertise as much. This is probably true, but I believe a TG provider faces many different problems with regard to clients than a GG provider does. I believe if a TG provider were to advertise she only wished to see a certain type of client, her business would suffer greatly. I don't believe that to be the case for most GG providers, especially if they are extremely sexy and hot. It is my opinion that most guys will only see a TG provider once, regardless of how hot she is and how well things may go. It's more of a novelty type of encounter and once it's done it's done. Therefore I believe Ana figures she won't see any of these guys again anyway, so why go out of her way to accommodate someone she's not attracted to and is never going to see again anyway. Probably not the best attitude to have, but not any different than some very hot, very young GG providers have, or so I've heard. I very rarely see providers in general and it is even more rare still for me to see a TG provider. Although in addition to Ana, I have seen Jennifer Paris and Mia Fever. Neither one is nearly as hot in person [in my opinion] as Ana and the overall experience was better and more satisfying with Ana. Not to a huge degree, but still to some degree. Jennifer also told me she sometimes feigns illness to avoid seeing a client she is totally unattracted to. So take this for what it is worth. Most providers are ultimately in this for the relatively quick and easy money, so their decisions may reflect that at times. After all most big corporations are far from totally honest  about what they are selling, many don't hesitate to tell out and out lies. Certainly not a perfect world we live in, but oh well. Just my 2 cents worth.

If you paid 400 dollars then you were a fool.

And I see some discrepancies in your post. I will that comment at that.

I paid $$50 and I'm definitely no fool. It was definitely a once in a lifetime experience. I am sure you could search the world over and not find a more beautiful TG, provider or otherwise. Her beauty surpasses many very beautiful GGs. It was definitely a most worthwhile experience. What discrepancies. I can assure you everything I wrote is exactly as it happened. If you can't accept it, that is your choice.

I am glad you had a great time. Personally I would have preferred that you  publish your review in the review section rather than the  forum .

I have a few issues with the assumptions of your post. I am not attempting to discredit you or the truthfulness of your post. These are just my impressions.


It appears the 24 of the 28 reviewers, some of whom are the most prolific on the site, are in far less shape than you, and are no where near as attractive as you. Could be.

It also appears that you believe that it is OK to rip off people that you will never see again. Remind me to delete you from my contacts list. Or could this mean that if someone is not as fit as you, he somehow deserves to get ripped off.

Finally, if a provider is honest, she will loose business. I have seen serveral ads where providers have requested that clients be "fit". Based on my impression of these providers, and their reviews, they do a good business.

MMMMHMMM  I smell a mark. "assman17" has a grand total of 3 posts  on this discussion board and absolutely no reviews and he tries selling us that a well-known bad provider is the greatest thing since sliced bread up to the point that she is the worlds greatest beauty.

"Surpasses many very beautiful GGs."

"Search the world over and not find a more beautiful TG."

A definite mark. Raving comments against everyone elses better knowledge? Whats next? Going to try convincing us that murdering Islamic radicals are nice guys?

I smell a big big rat. Your words betray you all too easy to this trained eye. I used to investigate testimonies of unsolved crimes in the Texas prison system for a living my friend. I know what to look for. Caught ya! No matter what YOU believe.

Jamie Has Some Comments...

I'm not going to comment on another girl and I don't know the provider in question, however I feel compelled to comment.

As much as I love all you guys, I have to say you  never seem to learn from the experiences of others.  A hot body in a photo often isn't the same thing in person and a porn star is not necessarily a great provider.  (I'm the exception of course... giggle... hot body aside...)

I don't mean to sound unsympathetic, but as to Sylnce's comment about prices.  The old adage "you get what you pay for" is often true.  If you get a girl off CL for $100 and then complain about it I'm sorry but I can't offer much sympathy.

Same thing if you decide to pay $400 for a date with a girl who has pages and pages of bad reviews and then complain that you didn't get what you paid for.  Like you expect a butterfly to suddenly emerge from a black widows nest.

Gentlemen, if you are seeking a quality, GFE date then you will usually have a better and more predictable time if you follow the standard rules discussed here on TER ad-infinitum.

Hugs,
TS Jamie  

Re: Jamie Has Some Comments...

Jamie thanks for your response and not joining in the flaming.[I'll respond to that a little later]. That is precisely why I debated about posting this to begin with. What you had to say rings very true. I went into this encounter with open eyes and an open mind. But I also figured there was a better chance than not that I would be very disappointed. That was a chance I was willing to take. If I had been treated to a very rushed sub par performance, I'd have had no-one to blame but myself. After all Ana does have several pages of very poor reviews. The fact that clients continue to see her regardless of those, is why she continues to perform as she does, rather than change or leave the business. The same reason entertainers make such obscene amounts of money. If people simply refused to pay the ridiculous ticket prices, some adjustments would have to be made. But we don't! So in essence we have no-one to blame but ourselves. I specifically did not post this in the review category because I know many members are not of VIP status and therefore would be unable to read the details. That means they would only see a positive review, perhaps then giving them a lot of false hope and setting them up for major disappointment. If you actually take the time to read this post, it is certainly not an all encompassing endorsement of Ana. It is simply a recounting of my experience. It is my firm belief if you are a good looking guy in exceptional physical shape and you treat her very well, you have a good chance at a very satisfying time with Ana. If you are not very good looking and have let your body go to seed, I don't think you have any chance at all. This is strictly my opinion based on her reaction to me. I could be 100% wrong as I said, this is MY OPINION! One thing a TG shares in common with us guys is, unlike a GG she can't fake being aroused. Either she is, or she isn't, it's that simple. From many of the things I've read on this board,[I also have a very close personal friend who is a very well respected provider] most providers "act" to a large degree during their sessions. How well they act, in addition to how they look, has everything to do with just how well they are reviewed. The smart ones who want as much repeat business as possible, know this. After all how many totally hot and sexy ladies do you know in real life, who want to go around letting a bunch of mediocre looking, balding, overweight guys fuck them senseless, or swallow their loads, or cum on their faces. This may sound harsh but it's a fact. I'm not saying all hobbyist look that way. I'm just basing it on a reasonable cross section of our population. It is my opinion that most TG providers "act" a lot less in their encounters, since they seem to travel extensively and seem far less concerned with repeat business. I never said it was OK to rip someone off. But if you walk into with your eyes wide open, I feel your as much to blame as the perpetrator, regardless of the venue. That's all I have to say about this matter, so flame away if you like.

"assman17" just posted his 4th total posting here. Sorry guy (maybe a disguised TG), but you have zero credibility. At this stage  GW Bush has more credibility than you.  Play your little game if you wish, it's not being bought here. If by chance you had maybe 50 posts and maybe a couple reviews, your credibility wouldn't be so questionable. You flew into this message board selling wolf tickets about a well known horrible provider as being all that and a bag of chips on your 2nd ever posting, then a 3rd and now a 4th. Nothing about it is feasable. NOTHING!!!  Not even your attempt to sneakily blast at so called aging balding fat guys as why others on here are not getting better treatment. It's hogwash and you need to stop while you have a smidgen of a chance of credibility later. Bottom line is, you come across as a provider trying to pretend to be a hobbyist. The angle smells way too fishy. Try again on SER maybe. TER residents are a tad smarter. You would have a better chance selling dogshit sandwiches to Hell's Angels than the shit you tried selling here.

... Ana is very attractive.  Ana gets lost of business.  Ana cannot perform for men she does not find attractive.  If Ana is not attracted to you, she still takes your money and does not fake attraction, hence you will likely have a bad time with Ana.  Ana does not care if you do not repeat...  Rinse and repeat.  This is how Ana stays in business.

This is hardly an endorsement for Ana.

I can buy that.  I don't need to wait for assman17's coveted 50th post, when all the clouds break and a sudden ray of light grants him divine powers of truth to see merit in his analysis.

Actually your 50th post is a Bar Transmitzvah!! More on that later.

As for the odds of getting awesome service from Ana? I would rather bet that a 13 will show up on a pair of dice at a casino. In other words it is not going to happen. He did not see her, and a sound logical guess it is either her or someone who knows her personally.

Now some cheeky tv wisdom for you to ponder what you are missing:

Do you hear the grasshopper that is at your feet?
Old man, how is it that you hear these things?
Young man, how is it that you do not?

"When you can take the pebble from my hand it will be time for you to leave"

All teasing aside the point being with assman17 is he tried selling a set of wolf tickets that he, against such overwhelming odds, was treated to the time of his supposed life by one of the worse known providers that was ever discussed on TER. Someone with years of history providing extremely bad service, yet he alone with his dashing sexy hot bodied movie star looks, has  been fortunate to overcome with his manliness. HA!! Right.  Fat bald guys need not apply and everyone that has posted bad reviews of Ana are fat ugly bald guys she rejected for their unsexiness? RIGHTTTTT!!!!!!  I got some wonderful beach front property to sell you in a lovely beautiful tropical paradise we call KANSAS.

Endorsement? No.
Attempt to cushion against horrible reviews and paint a different picture? Yes. WHY? That is the question that arouses serious suspicions. I saw more cliche nonsense in his 3 posts to last me a few years of chuckles at his expense.

If your spidey senses weren't tingling when or if you read his accessment, logically then you could be the next 400 dollar spending fool ringing Ana's phone number. Have at it, I rather spend my money on established great providers than going against all my better judgements.


-- Modified on 9/13/2007 6:39:31 PM

If you read the reviews of Ana, there are several positive ones.  If memory serves me correctly, there is a negative review where the reviewer posts that Ana did not care when he mentioned a bad review forthcoming.  According to that reviewer she claimed to be getting a lionshare of business no matter what reviewers stated.  So what we have now is corroboration of motive by reviewers other than assman.  The lowest appearance rating Ana receives is a 7 and an embittered 7's at that.  One reviewer even rates her a 10 on appearance, despite giving her a 1 for performance.  The majority of Ana's appearance ratings are a 9.  What we are now looking at is corroboration of her physical attractiveness as asserted by assman17.  Despite what your cynicism may lead you to believe, the evidence at hand from other reviewers dictates a scenario very possible as described by assman17.  Apparently she performs well for few, mediocre for several, and abysmal for many if the reviews are read as a trend.

If you truly believe your position, your next recourse should be to complain to TER about the unfeasible reviews given for Ana as you know better than the people who review the reviews and the people who post tepid thread responses, relaying there encounter with Ana.

You need to be corrected in your attempt to insinuate I suffer from some form of impaired judgement simply because my opinion is researched and deviates from your cynical judgements.  I feel your judgement of assman17 is incorrect, have stated my case with 3rd party corroborations, and refrained from attacks on your person.  Ana is not my type for $5 let alone $400, due to her poor reviews and frankly her Michael Jacksonesque nosejob does less than, "turn my crank".  

In ending, I hope you used more thourough methods of research during your stint as an unsolved crime investigator.  While we only deal in pleasures of the flesh here, you delt with life and death and freedom there.  Your cynicism, charater assasinations, and shaky conclusions may have led the innocent to the gallows.

I can care less about TER and complaints. They are there and they can stay there, it is not going to make me run to her door by any means. Maybe you might eh?

Now to your ahemm *cough cough* research. Lets blow a hole in this gasket shall we?  You harp on the bad providers looks ratings. I never once claimed this to be the case or an issue. I have seen her pics. Yes she is stunning so why are you harping the obvious???? HMMMM!!! My original and still current contention is she did not give ASSMAN17 the time of his life (unless of course he is a buffoon and thinks getting ripped off is a wonderful time). Its a fake assessment totally. Period !! And I find it interesting you are so quick to defend the guy and he has gone silent? HMMMM!!!  And you have how many posts as well? One admitting to knowing how to use aliases on this site? HMMMMM!!!!!! I smell a rat bubbah!!! I expect a comment from 'him' now at any moment. Lets see how predictable this might be!!! Prolly gonna be 2 protestors pop up!!! Might even be a 3rd!!!


I do plenty research when I get a notion. And its easy to find discrepancies when you know what to look for and how to look for them. Never let something become a fact without investigating whether or not it is a fact. Comprende?

Ahh back to what I am about to reveal on YOU!!! Mr Thorough method yourself!!!.

Fact! You have a whopping total of 12 comments posted on this board. 12!!!! Starting on 9/07 and 8 of those posts are from the day just past! You are a week old on this board!!! ONE WEEK!!! SO you my friend are just as suspect as the guy (or possible TG, or YOURSELF!!) you are backing up!! No history of established credibility from either one of you. And also you have NO reviews listed. Eh? Your credibility is taking some huge hits here my friend!!!  Not a thing you can say to that. Both of you guys fly in here at close to the the same time? Between the two of you there is what? 16 comments? 16????  ABSOLUTELY SUSPICIOUS!!!!!!

Next fact!!! This one reeks of fraud out of the ass!!!  QUOTE: "Open Up A New TER Account With Another E-mail Address And have fun boning the homophobes without consequence!  Works like a charm." GunsGerms+Steel® (9/11/2007 7:33:13 PM)

You are caught redhanded admitting that "opening up a new TER account with another email adress works like a CHARM!!" HMMMMMMMMMM!!!! interesting?  Do I smell another rat?  DAMN SKRAIT!!!  Perhaps you and assman17 are the same person? You sure protest in favor of his nonsense!!! THE MAN DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH!!! So just how many of these new addresses and charms have you created there bubbah???? Open mouth insert foot bubbah????

Now lets get away from you a bit because that was too easy to debunk!!!  Back to my so- called lack of research *cough* AHEMMM!!:

Fact!!! Ana has one review rating as a 10 performance by a TLeon69 in January. He is a 1 hit review wonder and has never posted on this message board. Sound like you and assman dont it??? NO CREDIBILITY!! Very suspiciousssssss!!!!!Is he the 1 guy out there thats NOT BALD FAT AND UGLY? It reeks of bullshit completely. Its a mark obviously. Assman17 is a mark trying to fly under the radar and YOU are marking for him with a small amount of posts as well. No credibility and too fresh to the board to be taken at word. Both of you or just one of you?? EH??? Inquiring minds wanna know!!  So go ahead and step up and deny loudly please!! Its expected, really. Its ok, go ahead! We KNOW its bound to happen now dont we?? Dont matter to me one way or another because I am not the village idiot spending money on the shitty ripoff provider.

Now for the ANA facts!!

Anas reviews:
1 - A Total Rip-off >>> 6 of these fat ugly bald guys spoken about??
2 - I should have stayed home >>> 9 of these, must be more FAT BALD UGLY GUYS EH???
3 - Barely worth the effort >> 5 of these
4 - She just laid there >> 3 of these
5 - Average >> 3 of these
7 - Hot Time >>> 1 of these?
10 - One in a lifetime >> 1 of these from a 1 hit wonder ?? yeah right!!


A total of 28 reviews,with the 10 rater is an obvious suspect review at best! Must have been Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise sucking her dick!!! SNICKER!!

As for the 7 rater, a search reveals he has 9 total posts on here and all are basically about Miami area ripoffs and the worse ripoff in Miami is who again? I smell rats where Ana is concerned. He gave her a 7 and then complains about other Miami providers? Interesting!!! Thats why I was paid to investigate obvious discrepancies in testimonies. Some lies stink so bad you cant help but clamp your nose shut. But hey grasshopper!! Snatch that pebble when you think you are ready!!! Cuz its still in my hand!!  LMAO!!!!!!!!!!  

Oh one last thing? You make this claim you were all that in your researching? I havent seen you research ANYTHING but restate the obvious posted material. Exactly what have you researched again? Like I said, never allow something to become a fact before its established whether or not it actually IS a fact. Your supposedly  researched up to the point you take that "10" reviewer at face value without investigating if HE was legitimate either. Not good detective work my friend. Not good at all.  Stick with me, grasshopper, and I will show you how to walk on rice paper without leaving footprints!!! ROFLMAO!!  Rookie!!!

Edited for Typos, I do apologize.

-- Modified on 9/14/2007 7:02:10 AM

-- Modified on 9/15/2007 7:23:26 AM

I have over 18 pages of posts to my credit (or dismay).  I'm not a rookie.  Unless you have another screen name you have only 7.

This man "doth protest too much" because you are completly incorrect and are behaving like a character sniper.  The target is me.

You cannot present a holistic analysis Ana's peformance by simply 'throwing out the extremes' to get them to conform to your opinion.  My plotting of the trend is correct.  Plot it graphically if you wish.  I have no idea why she performed mainly at a mediocre-abysmal level.  Baseless speculation is your area of expertise.  

I repost what is obvious, because hard data is factual and facts are usually obvious.  My approach is to assemble one body of hard data for cross reference to another body of hard data, relate them, and find trends.  After the trend is discovered I then speculate.

Your approach is to become suspicious of information that doesn't gel with your "instincts" (subconscious analysis) then search for any method to feed your initial instinct.  You only seek to discredit by cynicism, not to take data at face value.  You create a series of flaming hoops posters who argue with you need to leap through, each hoop higher, thinner, and more hotly burning than the last.  First they need 50+ posts to have credibility, next they need to post reviews that agree with the general trend of other reviews, then they need more than one review.  My suspicion is that you have some artificial number of reviews greater than 2 to satisfy your criterion.  

When a poster has less than 50 posts and you document it, you've only proven that they have les than 50 posts.  You have not proven they are not credible.  If you find a contradiction in what they say, you have then proven them not credible and only in that instance.  Using your method of analysis, most of my first posts here sung the praises of Jasmin Thai.  According to your thinking I was Jasmin Thai up until I surpassed 50 posts.  Simultaneously I was still Jasmin Thai in my reviews until I posted a review for Alexis.  Truthfully, I just happened to have the time of my life with Jasmin Thai.  At no point was I ever really Jasmin Thai, hence your method of identification is completely unsound.

If you doubt my prior screen name, I direct you to a post located in the link.  The content of the post is very similar to what is contained here.  I think that type of speculative analysis appeals to your conspiracy theorist thought process.

You attribute the 'fat, bald guy' theory to me, when it is not my theory.  'Fat, bald guy' theory is assman17's speculation and he states it as such.  You try so hard to discredit the good reviews, yet make no effort to discredit the bad reviews, which means you do not treat all Ana's reviews initially as equals and are biased toward the bad reviews.  

I've yet to see a contradiction anywhere.  What I do see is a generally poor, but not universally poor performance on Ana's behalf.  Perhaps much like a good provider can have a bad day, a bad provider can have a good day.  That is my speculation.  It is also my speculation that your next step will be to transform your approach from cynicism to skepticism, in that you will believe no information is reliable as you prefer to stick with your "instincts".  Again this is speculation on my part and cynical speculation at that.

-- Modified on 9/15/2007 7:52:39 AM

Sigh you are such an easy person to debunk. Not even challenging in your lack of skills to investigat the easist tasks. If you are Horizon Fire, then go back to that persona and leave this one be. It doesnt become you.

Now lets debunk you to hell and back shall we?

Your quote: "Unless you have another screen name you have only 7."  
My answer: Not including this immediate post I have 164, my first posting ever was 7/4/2002 4:07:23 AM.  Over 5 years ago. So mr researcher why is it you cannot find something that simple? 7 eh? Sad my friend! Very sad you cannot research something that simple and come up with a number of 7???

Your quote: "This man "doth protest too much" because you are completly incorrect and are behaving like a character sniper.  The target is me.
My answer: No "assman17" is my target. You got involved by backing up his claim and accepting the validity of it despite the information available. I refused to believe his post is real and valid, you on the other hand do. I used available information to come to that conclusion. You take him at his word. Huge mistake.

Your quote: "I repost what is obvious, because hard data is factual and facts are usually obvious.  My approach is to assemble one body of hard data for cross reference to another body of hard data, relate them, and find trends.  After the trend is discovered I then speculate"
My Answer: The trend is she is a horrible provider. Where should your speculation be? What hard data? The only hard data I see is she is just that, a horrible provider. No ifs ands ors nors, or buts about it. She has one glowing review, again I say the one review is from someone that has NOT ONCE EVER posted a comment here. And you accept it at face value?  Not very good with hard data my friend. Lesson my friend and this is the 3rd time I say this. NEVER ACCEPT SOMETHING AS FACT BEFORE IT IS A FACT!! Case in point:The earth is flat! That was a known fact for centuries, do you realize that? It was accepted at face value.

Your quote: "My suspicion is that you have some artificial number of reviews greater than 2 to satisfy your criterion"
My response:  I have 12 reviews. Not 2. Again you can research that very easy but we see again you lack that ability and threw out a random number of 2. All my reviews were from when I lived in Houston Texas. I no longer live there and that fact reflects why I have not sent in a review in a long time. I could have been a liar and fake some posts just for the free VIP acccess but I do not. I am now in a city that TSs are extremely rare and what I do see is nasty nasty nasty. I stick by that alone to reflect my own honesty.

Your quote: "According to your thinking I was Jasmin Thai up until I surpassed 50 posts.  Simultaneously I was still Jasmin Thai in my reviews until I posted a review for Alexis.  Truthfully, I just happened to have the time of my life with Jasmin Thai.  At no point was I ever really Jasmin Thai, hence your method of identification is completely unsound."
My answer: I never once accused you of being Jasmin Thai. You are trying to create a strawman arguement? Not only that, Jasmin Thai is not known as a horrible provider. No reason to doubt such posts when you see them. Common sense is needed to arrive at that conclusion???

Its been fun knocking the hell out of your lack of ability to debate and research. I am now logging off to watch the Alabama-Arkansas game. Good luck to you as you dress up as Jasmin Thai!! Does her panties even fit you? hehehe!!Personally I want to dress up with Mia Fever *wink*

Look my man, we can bang and butt heads all day. And neither one will convince the other of a thing. Shake hands and lets move on. Agreed? I will even be a nice guy and give you the last word!!! Thanks for actually what has been an enjoyable and entertaining discussion.

So what you are saying, as you never accept anything as fact, is that I am assman17 or was a few posts ago, but now I'm not.
"Case in point:The earth is flat! That was a known fact for centuries, do you realize that? It was accepted at face value."

The earth was never flat despite what people thought.  You are mistaking 'popular concensus' for 'fact'.  Despite what people believed, and not all people believed the earth to be flat that is just a historical folktale, it was not.  Ancient Grecian mathmeticians knew the earth not to be flat as did Ancient Egyptian sailors, as did Magellan, as did Viking explorers. What the mistaken orthodoxy did was state the earth was flat and treated it like a fact.  Because something is treated like a fact or stated like a fact doesn't make it a fact.  If people truly believed the earth flat, nobody would have ever sailed the Atlantic for fear of falling off the earth.

"My Answer: The trend is she is a horrible provider. Where should your speculation be? What hard data? The only hard data I see is she is just that, a horrible provider. No ifs ands ors nors, or buts about it. "

Your answer is similar, but less precise than mine.  You don't take in account the body of reviews, you only look at the median, hence you throw out the extremes to get the data to conform to your cynical evaluation.  I stated before that the bulk of her reviews are abysmal, some mediocre, few positive.

"My response:  I have 12 reviews. Not 2. Again you can research that very easy but we see again you lack that ability and threw out a random number of 2. All my reviews were from when I lived in Houston Texas. I no longer live there and that fact reflects why I have not sent in a review in a long time. I could have been a liar and fake some posts just for the free VIP acccess but I do not. I am now in a city that TSs are extremely rare and what I do see is nasty nasty nasty. I stick by that alone to reflect my own honesty. "

I never claimed that you have only 2 reviews.  I claimed that like the arbitrary Bar Mitzvah 50+ posts you require, you probably have an arbitrary Bar Mitzvah number of reviews you require to meet your standard of 'creditable' (is that a word?).

"Its been fun knocking the hell out of your lack of ability to debate and research. I am now logging off to watch the Alabama-Arkansas game. Good luck to you as you dress up as Jasmin Thai!! Does her panties even fit you? hehehe!!Personally I want to dress up with Mia Fever *wink*"

You use the ad hominem attack model, and the model of appeal to authority in an attempt to bully posters who disagree with you.  You claim to be a former crime investigator as if that somehow makes you infallible in these matters.  Truthfully if you were any good or in such demand, why do you not still investigate crimes?  Why did you work for the government and not the higher paying private sector?  That is speculation on my behalf though and not fact.

You make use of the context dropping model by distorting statements made and not presenting them in the context in which they were originally expressed.  As my quotations of your misquotes show at times you suffer from funtional illiteracy.  You know most of the words, but cannot string together a body of words or sentences to understand a general idea.

The only thing you are correct on is that we will never agree.  Effective information exchange and discussion is predicated upon both parties having literacy.  You've "knocked the hell" out of no arguments as many of your arguments against me are borne out of your functional illiteracy.  If you can't even understand my arguments my cause is lost.  Even when you understand them you resort to the skepticism I predicted earlier to try to pass it off as a debunking.

And thus ends our fun chat on this particular thread! As a gentleman of my word, I gave you the last word on the subject at hand and am not going to rehash or rebut any of it. Handshakes and you have a great one. Look forward to more posts, be it we agree or disagree!!  LOL!!! Even if you are Jasmin Thai in disguise hehehe

There has been much discussion on Ana, the Miami Goddess.  I really don't think they answered your question, clearly.

I do not recommend her, as I know her too well.  Yes she is very Beautiful and Sexy, I know this isn't a question, but her performance is.  To me, that is the most important thing.

I tend to agree with “Sylynce”, “Colonel Obvious”, “LATSDog”, and “dax2u” (sorry if I missed someone), as their generalizations of her “is a poor provider!”  "Sylynce" stated it but is got lost in the fames, so here are the cold hard facts:

First off, “TER” has rules to determine the “Rip-Off” status of a provider, and there is a reason for this.  Ana’s claims a lot of things, being young, GFE and here to fulfill your fantasies, and so on.  But alias, many of us have not found this not to be true (me included, more on that later).  She has reviews dating back to October 2002.  She has a total of 28 reviews that breakdown this way (and I do not, nor can I not included “assman17’s” post on her, as it does not fit the criteria of a review!):

Appearance:
10’s  3
9’s  12
8’s  8
7’s  5
Totaling 237 points, with an average of 8.4642, round up to 8.5, or somewhere between “Really Hot and Model Material.”  Now, let us talk about her performance, which in my opinion is more important for me and a reason why I would want to see a provider,

Performance:
1’s  6
2’s  9
3’s  4
4’s  3
5’s  3
7’s  1
10’s  1
Totaling a whopping 83 points, with an average of 2.9642, round up to 3.0, or “Barely worth the effort”.  Only two reviews above 5, “average” and the majority of them are 2’s.

So I don’t understand how someone can claim that she has positive reviews.  Am I missing something in the logic here…..  With only one or two that are high and the rest low, I just don't see it.

Also, I also question "assman17" post, as to me it seems a review and not an opinion, but that's my POV and the powers to be have left it.  I glad it worked out for him, but for 99% of us it won't.

Also, “assman17” (quote “It is my firm belief, if you are not very attractive and in shape, as well as very polite and treat her with a great deal of respect, you won't have a very satisfying time.”) and “GunsGerms+Steel (quote “Apparently she performs well for few, mediocre for several, and abysmal for many if the reviews are read as a trend.”), I think it is more of that she performs well for one, and abysmal for the rest!!  Beauty is in the eye of the behold and what is her type, a 6’2”, muscle bound hulk with a big, 10 plus fat “c@#$k!!!  “assman17” is correct in many ways, if your ugly, not in shape (but if you use the news media statistics, 60 percent of us are obese!!), and do not treat her with respect, then you are more than likely to have a bad encounter.

But now I'm off the track, I think the stat's I put forth are clear enough.  I think most of us, wish to have an enjoyable encounter and she isn't likely to do that.  If you want more on her, let me know.