Write Review
2,078,920 Total Reviews 4,054 New Reviews
11,657 Users Online

Transsexual

Proposed Post for Suggestion & Policy Discussion Board
TS Tempted 1554 reads
posted

"TS Review Data

Over on the TS Discussion Board we have been discussing the lack of certain very pertinent information in TS reviews.

Question for the Moderators - Posted by T_Lover, 12/13/2007
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=28177&boardID=19&page=1


The bottom line of this discussion is that TS reviews are not as useful as they could be because the generic review form does not specifically prompt for certain unique TS information and not all TS reviewers remember to include some of these specifics in the written portion of their reviews.  

It has been suggested that the review form should be amended as follows - on the review form in the section “Provider’s Appearance” the last item is “Transsexual” which has menu choices of “[blank]”, “no”, “yes.preOp”, “yes.postOp”.  BELOW this line item there should be the following items relating to TS providers:

Functionality:  Diamond Cutter, semi-erect, flaccid
Versatility:  top, bottom, versatile, don’t know
Cock size (when erect):  5 or less, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 10+
Circumcised:  yes, no

BTW these would all become searchable items as well.  In addition it would be very helpful to be able to search TS PROFILES ONLY for most reviewed providers and by the most prolific reviewers (top 50 in each category is probably plenty).

It is sincerely hoped that TER will give serious consideration to these suggestions as they would significantly enhance the usefulness of TS reviews and profiles.   This should make TER the most comprehensive place, by far, for TS reviews by as most other TS review boards are also deficient in obtaining this information on a consistent basis from their TS reviewers.

Regards,


TS Tempted"


[If you guys have any other suggestions/modifications or other ideas please post a reply here and I’ll consider them for inclusion in this post when submitted.]

-- Modified on 12/14/2007 1:18:00 PM

T_Lover1157 reads

Looks great to me TST.  Thanks for all your hard work.  Hopefully we'll be given a bit more respect, even though we are the black sheep of the board!

ReplyQuoteReport
TSSometimes1410 reads

i fully agree. the only things about the basic profile is that the first reviewer's inputs can never be changed and they show up on the provider's profile page.

The problem with this is that the provider may have been a diamond cutter for the first reviewer but not for several others.

There other issue is that if the first review is a self post, which tends to be very postive, then that will stay on forever. This is not just an issue for TS reviews but all reviews.

Suggestions:
1. Make available the the basic profile that each and every reviewer inputs. This can be part on the review page of the reviewer
2. Or the first review should only be accepted from reputed reviewers

ReplyQuoteReport
TSMissJasmine1341 reads

I think its a great idea to give hobbyists more detailed search information. While providers most personal assets are put out there for all the world to see, I have one simple request to add to this. And, it could be added to the gg section as well (damn bleeders).

What about adding a field or 2, to allow the provider to rate the hobbyist. Doesnt have to be performance based (we wouldn't want to put any pressure on our lovers brains).
1. Overall cleanliness - 1-10
2. came prepared. y/n
3. Overall attitude towards provider
4. Left with a smile. no/yes/small/med/large

In any case...that would be cool

- Jas

ReplyQuoteReport
TS Tempted897 reads

No one would be surprised to know that I like your idea but it just isn’t very practical.  I’d love to see a discussion on this topic again – its been done on so many other boards but I can’t remember if we’ve had that discussion here on the TS board yet.  In any event have you heard of TER’s Whitelist?

INFO & POLICIES: WHITE LIST FAQ
http://www.theeroticreview.com/info_policies/whiteListFAQ.asp


So we do have a tool, this “Whitelist”, that could sort of be used as you’ve described but I don’t think it gets much mileage even over on the GG side of things.

If you guys really want to start this debate, move it to a new thread please.  If we come up with any good suggestions I’ll volunteer to consolidate and submit them to the Suggestion & Policy board or you can always submit your own as well.  

Let’s just take one topic at a time though, please!

Respectfully,


TS Tempted


-- Modified on 12/14/2007 1:15:37 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
TSMissJasmine1181 reads

no sense shooting for the moon. just get approved whats likely to be approved.

just pullin yer chain.

Sarcastic Bitch,

- Jas

ReplyQuoteReport
TS Rachel1156 reads

Great and important thread TS Tempted(better connections can be made when there is more specific information on a reviewed provider)...another item on this list should be:

Ejaculates Per Request: yes, no, did not request

seems so many hobbyists like when a provider can( or as i've read on here), though providers can't/don't with every client, especially when they see multiple gentlemen in a single day

DFK, Rachel

Related Link: http://www.swedishharmony.com/stars/13/103.html

ReplyQuoteReport
WaylonSmithers934 reads

There should be a field that states whether a T-girl had an ejaculation or not during the encounter.

ReplyQuoteReport
JustATransGirl1257 reads

Add me to the other girls comments.  Well whadda ya expect?

Also on for the guys...

Under 3 inched errect
5-7 inches
7-9 inches
10+ --- this alone should qualify for a 10% discount...  :-)

Rock hard
Semi  hard
Flacid
Viagra needed
Had to pump it up first...

Sucked like a fire pump
licked it like a popsicle
Bite it till he had to be smacked

Giggle,
TS Jamie :-)

Related Link: http://www.justatransgirl.com

ReplyQuoteReport
TSMissJasmine970 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!