I could be wrong, and since I don't currently have vip status I couldn't check if the reviewer has other reviews and is therefore legit, but this review, which popped up immediately after a bad one for this provider was published, seems a little "self" promoting. (But, even if it is, that doesn't mean she doesn't have a legitimate gripe).  

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1698510

END OF MESSAGE

Looks to me that it was written by the provider, especially when you read the last sentence.

It is the only review by that reviewer.

Except for the very poor English, this was an excellent review! Fake? Couldn't be! It seemed totally legit to me...except maybe for the part at the end where the reviewer speaks as the provider in the first person... LOL!

She just got a bad review so maybe this was her way to try and correct things?????

END OF MESSAGE

she Tried...

If English is not the first Language of the reviewer, then the review could certainly be legitimate.  What is perhaps more noteworthy, (BUT OFF TOPIC HERE, SO SORRY), is the entire manipulation of the review process.  There seems to be any number of Gurlz only wanting to be reviewed by Reviewers who have reviewed lots of other Gurlz.  Why?  

Without attempting to answer this Why Question, A modest proposal is in Order here; to wit, think of your Drivers License Points system.  In most jurisdictions, points disappear from the record after, let's say, One Year.  The older Reviews ought to disappear, and run off the record after, let's suggest, One and One half years.  Or maybe two years.  Why?  Hey, then the Gurlz might want to be reviewed anew, to show a real and recent record created by new names, so to say.  So what if some provider was hot 3 years ago...It seems More real and More Believable if an newer Client posts a recent review...and the language might help with the analysis by supplying a fresh impression...rather that having the "cut and paste" feel of some of the reviews by them that have posted many reviews...many of which seem to focus more on the reviewer's imagined prowess at certain activities...

This proposal makes sense, for, (if you think carefully), how does anyone really know that a session took place...the entire review process could be simply invented.  Who could really say for certain.

Finally, every new Review ought to show the amount of the contribution, especially when the incident took place away from the home area, and was instead a review in "a traveled to location" like NYC or DC, where perhaps the fee was much higher.....Where is service the best??? At Home or Offshore??? Maybe you have to go to DC to receive the kind of session you dream of, because at home the fee is just too low, but the provider does not want to really indicate that too cheep creates a bad vibe...

Any observations by the providers would be interesting to read.

Stay lucky, one and all.

Because, If a provider always have good reviews ( esp. if she's a total bottom), I rather stay away.
That provider won't last long and let every fucker here do whatever they want with her.
Hell no....You need a provider who has some personal preferences and not just suck-ass because she wants to have 'good reviews'. I want to see some bad ones of her as well. It shows she doesn't give a fuck to jeopardize herself.

It's simple stupid. It means the provider is not a 'yes sir' kind of girl. Most girls who care too much of 'reviews', are mostly dangerous, most end up dead of diseases. You guys need to use your heads, don't just follow what other say.
She has to be able to reject and use her own judgment, despite of what other thinks she should do. A girl with common sense and good head on her shoulder.

Damn good post and I agree completely.

I'd prefer it was just straight transparency. If a girl doesn't mind going bb, we take that into our notes and than decide whether or not that girl is what we are looking for. Some may not care to see the girl out of risk, others may flock to her. To each their own of course.  

But because I'm making a gamble...I prefer to gather my info and assess my risks from there.

I have to say I agree.

Same here...if they are all top notch with zero board input, I wonder.  Everyone has different tastes and interests so they all can't always be 10/10 or close.