If anyone might recognize this lady it would be from this board.

This lady popped up on the provider scene In March of 05. She's a Houston based Latina who tours to Vegas and DC. She's had some obvious work done but the jury is still out regarding her original gender.

Two threads on the Houston board indicate that reviews identifying her as a T-girl were taken down. One thread on the Vegas board complained that she is misrepresenting herself and that also, her reviews indicating she's T-Girl were taken down.

One review says that she does vaginal penetration but with a lot of KY. Not unusual but what is unusual was that the reviewer also said, after some trouble staying in she simply insisted they go Anal. Now that is unusual as most GG don't prefer anal or at least they charge extra for it.

Now I've seen at least one negative review that was pulled since the beginning of this month. So the whole profile comes into question. Also, at least two of her reviews appear to be fakes.

But with a body that smokin, she might be worth TOFTT.

E-mailed her twice to book a date but no return messages. Her phone number was disconnected last week but her website calendar was update in the last week.

Any thoughts?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=3649&boardID=38&page=

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=2906&boardID=38&page=

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=28468&boardID=3&page=

Her website was registered in February of 05.

she definatly looks like a post-op to me, with those large hips, but i sure would like to climb
all over that body!

That definitely sounds suspicious, especially the part about her needing a lot of KY for vaginal sex then switching to anal and apparently not charging extra for it.

I did a search for "Claudia" on hungangels.com and did see a post citing a post-op TS by the same name and it mentioned the hotclaudia.com Web site to which you referred. That by itself is probably not conclusive, but when considered with the rest of the factors, sure makes it a dubious situation.

Also, it's really difficult to get a fix on her just from her photo. And even if you saw what's between her legs, it might be difficult to ascertain for sure whether she's a GG or post-op TS. The SRS work they do these days (mainly in Thailand) is pretty amazing and makes it difficult to tell whether you're looking at a man-made vagina or not. As my uncle used to say, "A man on a fast horse on a dark night wouldn't know the difference."

Personally, I'd say if you're looking for a true GG experience with no surprises, pass on this one and look for someone else with a better track record. The upside, for me anyway, isn't that great and the downside could be a real "buzz kill."

Love that sexy dance.