Transsexual
Sorry, fellow admirers, but did I miss where the pulled review was proven to be bogus? I'm ambivalent about any review which indicates bbfs might have occurred (it might encourage dangerous activity or just be a self-serving lie) but I am not at all ambivalent about the need for reviews to stand unless they are either vengefully mean-spirited or clearly untrue.
The review in question was a glowing one. Not mean-spirited. The only question seemed to be was it true with regard to the bbfs (the beautiful, hot and gfe reports no one challenged).
I have posted a link to an earlier thread about multiple providers offering bbfs. I have had personal correspondence with more than a half dozen regulars who have been offered and/or indulged in bbfs with well-reviewed providers, IN THE PAST YEAR ALONE. I myself have been offered it on multiple occasions. It does happen.
Another thread has clearly pointed out that all hobbyists do not receive the same service: sometimes bbfs is one of the services that some hobbyists are offered by some providers. Just because a provider covers up with you, doesn't mean she always covers up with everyone. Just because you get tons of DFK doesn't mean the next guy will be so fortunate. Or perhaps the next guy will not be interested.
To call a review bogus because we don't want to believe it -- or because it wasn't true for us -- is not for me satisfactory. I do not know Daisy. I know absolutely nothing about her beyond the fact that everyone who has spoken to me about her says she is AWESOME. So why pull the review? We are all adult enough to decide for ourselves what to believe and I hope we are mature enough to protect ourselves and not allow our fantasies about these beautiful strangers we adore to cause us to forget our mortality or tempt fate by driving drunk without a seat belt.
I realize it's a morally equivocal world. However, reasonable people should consider the source, not ban the opinion. This is a review board. We need contrasting opinions and providers must be allowed to speak up for themselves in the face of these opinions.
Put up an asterix for 'dubious' reviews, compare the reviewer's other reviews to your own experiences, and use your head to make your own decisions, free of censorship.
Then again, if someone knows for a fact the review is bogus and has shown the Staff/Mod/Whoever that it IS bogus, then, of course, pull it. But is that what happened? Mod? Staff? Answer? Anybody wanna chime in and tell me to shut up. Maybe delete this post? 
Finally, I am forced to quote Transspoter one time. He wrote: 'I am a careful man and do not want to risk doing it with a provider who does not behave responsibly.'.
Transspoter, ,if you do not want to 'risk doing it' with someone who does not 'behave responsibly' then perhaps you should not be having sex with prostitutes -- especially extremely popular transsexual prostitutes. In the "real world" this behavior is innately irresponsible. Whether a prostitute utillizes condoms with all 1000 of her unknown partners or with merely 998 of them -- you are taking a risk. The "responsible" part is only in your choosing to be one of the 998 and NOT one of the 2.
Thanks for reading. Now: play safe, share love, be well.
-- Modified on 6/19/2005 9:33:51 AM