Transsexual

agree
tsCAT99 637 reads
posted

too many image artifacts....me think it's fakey.  Another pic of "her" from another ad left the suntan from the neck up.  'Course, could be wrong.

...look like she pasted her face on this someone elses body.  The 1st pic really creeps me out.

tsCAT99638 reads

too many image artifacts....me think it's fakey.  Another pic of "her" from another ad left the suntan from the neck up.  'Course, could be wrong.

LATSDog636 reads

Wow, that is the most obvious photochop ever.  I wonder if the phone is ringing? Also, why would any website accept that quality of picture for a paid ad?  It not only is obvious but hurts the overall credibility of the site itself, if you ask me.

I recognize the face & phone number.  Had a session a few years ago.  Nothing great- had better & had worse.  Am betting the photo chop is to disguise a weight gain. She was a big girl, but proportionate back then.

LATSDog975 reads

Thats a really really really bad photo chop job for sure.  How could anyone think thats real.


100% TV and known for posting fake photo-shop pics. Went by the name Victoria at the time.

Unfortunately i had a bad experience with this person as i was so disappointed at being tricked, i couldn't go on and ended early
before it really even began.
the bottom pic on the ad is legit but this is more drag than TS. Good at changing up the voice too. Prior to the visit,the pic had some
photo-shopped all nude pics including full busty "tits". This was among my early learning and experiencing stages of fake photo-shop pics.

Register Now!