While many have mentioned that reviews are not as frequent as before, I find it more frustrating that reviews of trans providers are always lower. What the am I saying??? More often these days I see someone who has written reviews of both genetic and trans women. However, the trans providers are ridiculed more and given lower scores but not just for performance which could be understandable but for looks too. WTF if you're writing a review for a trans provider who has consistently received look ratings of 8-9+ and you give her a 5-6 becasue you're new to being with trans providers. You thought they will all look like trans porn stars, zero manly characteristics, zero body hair or facial hair, get a grip on yourself.
Many guys need to wake the "F" and understand what their fantasy really is and stop taking out their anger management or insecurity issues on providers. The same for guys who see the same trans provider multiple times, give them low scores and complain about them in the reviews. Stop seeing them if it's that bad, are you that stupid? If you desire to be with a trans girl, but can't admit it to yourself, how is that the providers fault? You need to understand and own up to your fantasy or you'll continue to have some crazy stuff going on in your head and take it out on others. In other words stop being a d!ck and admit you want some d!ck!!! I appoligize if that's your name, just using it as a metaphor...They are not always lower. There is one in the top 10. I have seen some that are above 9. But on average, sure they are lower. Some may be cases like what you say. But a lot of it is something that applies to them, but not cis women.
The word of the day is versitile. So many say they are, but they really are not. This will lead to some disappointment, and she may look great, but not be what a client was looking for in his experience. If you want to be topped, and she is not doing it well, or in some cases will even say "I was hoping to bottom" or "I can't get it up today", you will be disappointmed no matter how hot she is. Even if you want to top her, you may want a stiff one to suck on before you get there. And so many times she can't get it up which you would expect she could if she was really versitile.
While I understand saying versitile when you are not may bring in more business, it will also bring more disappointment if you are really not. The ones I have seen that are rated high are honest. I have seen true bottoms who say that's what they are upfront. I know what to expect with them. I have seen true versitile ladies as well who are rated high. Now, I have not see a top, because that's not my thing, but the one provider in the top 10 on TER, well she is a top and she says so upfront. Honesty in this area goes a long way.
Adding to this, as someone who sees both CIS and Trans, I have found more Trans who don't really want to kiss and who do CBJ and not BBBJ. These will also hurt there reviews. Again, doesn't matter how good they look. These things should be upfront if you don't want them to hurt your reviews.
All that said, I'm sure your points have some validity too. Some guys may be experimenting and not really know what and then not review a Trans provider well because of their own unreasonable expectations. But it's not all on these type of clients.
If I touched a nerve, that was not my intention. I was also not speaking about performance ratings, which I did mention. You comments aren't that in line with what I brought up, although good points for other discussion. I was primarily speaking about 2 things; 1) the ratings from some reviewers who have seen genetic and trans providers rate the looks of trans providers with more bias. 2) in general reviews of trans providers are more critical, again on looks. Some trans providers do get look ratings of 8-9-10. Those same girls will get a look review of 5-6 by the guys I'm speaking of, and when you look at their reviews, all the trans providers they've seen are lower but they still see them and are more critical. You confirmed my point that some guys are experimenting. That's fine, the hobby is all about experimenting and living out fantasies. But if you didn't want a banana in your sundae, why did you ask for it multiple times and then complain about the banana. If you tried it and didn't like it, stop trying it, is my point.
Lol touched a nerve? Not really. Just discussing other points. What you are referring to I have seen with cis reviews as well. Usually it’s because pics don’t match what you see in person. With cis women, it’s either dated or touched up pictures. Maybe she looks older. Maybe not as nice skin. Maybe a little heavier. Maybe it’s not even her. And yet, some guys will repeat with these women because they had a good time.
Perfect example is kgirls. They are routinely reviewed lower, and yet the same guys who review them lower keep returning. Why? Because they are having a good time. You can probably apply the same to Trans women. They don’t always look like their pics. In addition to what I mentioned about cis women, they also may not look as feminine as their pictures. And yet the guys who reviewed them low sometimes return because they are having a good time.
I have seen these guys you talk about. You look at their reviews and they have seen numerous Trans women, and they are always on the low side. And in some cases they have also seen numerous cis women, and yet rank them higher. I get it.
But my point is despite this, there are those Trans women who rise above this and are reviewed extremely well. They are doing something that sets them apart. So in the end, while they might be reviewing some lower than they should, there is a reason for it.
Ok, I understand your other points and they're all valid and good conversation topics. What I still can't determine is if you really understood the main point of my initial post "understanding your fantasy? How guys are often biased toward trans providers becasue they can't admit to themselves they're excited about a girl with a cock. It can be seen in their reviews and how they continue to review trans providers more critically than genetic ones and so on.
Oh I get your point. It’s just that either some of the higher ranked women somehow avoid these guys or they somehow manage to get high reviews despite this issue. I know one that I saw specifically told me she doesn’t like to see clients that don’t really know what they want with her. So perhaps she does her homework before accepting a booking from just any client, specifically ones with some uncertainty.
And getting lectures on morality from mongers on a review board?
There are a few reasons why trans providers are rated poorly compared to cis women and it isn't any bias, bigotry or transphobia.
1) Bait and switch. All providers use touched up/edited photos, but it is taken to the extreme with trans women. Lots of TS providers use touched up photos that are over a decade old which has the potential to cause disappointment. They use a lot of filters. It is very rare to find a TS provider who uses recent, accurate pictures. When a guy is disappointed he is more likely to go negative in a review because he feels ripped off. Unfortunately it is just way more common with trans providers than with cis providers.
2) By and large cis women are more attractive than trans women. Trans women take hormones and undergo surgeries to make themselves appear more feminine. Not to mention lots of trans women use sex work to pay for treatment, so many of them are in the process of transitioning. In some cases, there is only so much you can do. Cis women benefit from a more natural look and have less plastic surgery.
3) Poor service and misrepresentation. When it comes to Cis women, GFE is GFE. There are lots of trans women who promise VIP services, GFE, kissing and all of that, then once you get there all of that is out the window. There is a lot of bait and switch and last second upcharges. MSOG is incredibly rare and they always try to make you cum and go. It is hard to find a true GFE that actually delivers as promised. If a guy is used to seeing CIS providers goes to a trans provider, he will be disappointed and feel ripped off. Lets be real, the "looks" score isn't all about looks. If you have a great time with a provider most reviewers will bump up their looks score. If you have a bad time, you're more likely to judge their looks negatively.
If a guy mostly sees Cis providers and tries a trans provider, he is likely going to be upset as the standards are lower for TS providers. The demand for TS providers is outpaced by supply so the girls get away with more. Most guys who see TS providers regularly seem to understand this. If anything I've noticed TS providers are graded on a curve (i.e. they are over-rated consistently vs CIS women in terms of service). Its hard to find a quality TS provider, so I tend to find favorites and stick with them.