The Erotic Highway

When she is way too explicit
sweetman 93 Reviews 588 reads
posted
1 / 4

We've discussed how careful we have to be on SA to avoid saying anything about money that could be construed as promoting prostitution. We can easily get banned from SA. But what about when the SBs do it?  I just had one cute little AA girl who DM'd me onsite: "I charge $300 anything intimate". ( My response of course was simply "thanks for replying, let's move to text.")  Her statement is so blatantly transactional, very much about "sex for money".  If I made an offer like that I wouldn't be surprised to get banned!  But do the girls ever face censure or banning from the site? I've never heard of it happening, yet I've received similarly blatant offers before. Just wondering if this is a double standard wherein they let the girls slide but come down hard on any men who talk this way on the site.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 46 reads
posted
2 / 4

I got booted from SA because the chick complained about my PPM.  So I am not sure SA scans every message for ppm etc.  But upon complaint you would get the boot.  If you don't complain about her, they might not be aware of it.

herbtcat 6 Reviews 44 reads
posted
3 / 4

The software to do so is fairly simple to add to their system to run a daily scan of all messages. But it's probably much harder to do that in real time as each message is sent.  The sheer number of exceptions (a message with a potentially objectionable word or phrase) would overload any "audit/review" team.  But a daily batch could kick out daily queues for human review.   That would show as profiles that get flagged or banned within a day or two of sending a "bad" message.  

 
Next, as noted, any submitted complaint would probably bump a message to the top of that audit/review list.  

 
Finally, I do believe (with ZERO evidence) that the SB's are held to a lower standard.  Why? No idea. But we all have seen profiles disappear...  

 
And I'll close with an observation that we have had the same discussion recently with pics. Substitute "explicit message" with "explicit pic" and we see the same questions with the same lack of verifiable answers.  

 
Life is good

 
The Cat

liqq63 19 Reviews 44 reads
posted
4 / 4

I'd say that there is for sure a double standard.  I've had a profile edit rejected because I used the word "intimacy".  But I've seen numerous SB profiles that broach the topic of PPM quite boldly.  And I've gotten DM that asks specifically if I'm "up for a BJ".  

Register Now!