I'm from a big city (PHX) and with all my filters, I usually get 3400. But being alot more pessimistic than you my friend, I typically never search past 2 days. Typically this limits me to maybe 150. I've noticed that rarely the girls whom I have some genuine interest in are rarely active much more than this, short of those just dabbling to see what's out there.
My problem is that over the past couple of months there has been an avalanche of online and platonic college girls, probably due to social media postings. The true quality has totally plummeted to where if I can cull more than 6-10 it's a miracle. otoh - my response rate seems to be much higher than the past.
The absolute "head count" (pun intended 
of SB's in whatever you define as your "market" will always vary greatly. Perhaps it's influenced by seasonal or cyclic trends, like school starting/ending, holiday season, or even more frequently by things like monthly rent coming due. It's been a recurring topic here as long as I can remember. In fact, I and others (including you) have gone so far as to post detailed stats (proving that if an SD is not balls deep in sweet SB pussy, he really has no other life whatsoever!) on the numbers and percentages by various demographics.
But I want to evolve the discussion, please. The absolute number of SB's, no matter how you filter or qualify them, is only as important as the ratio of SB's to SD's. So the number of SB's is only the numerator. To really understand if your personal hunting ground is fertile (pun intended again you need to understand the denominator as well - the number of SD's who qualify as legitimate competition to you.
So yes, the number may be going up or down. So what? I think a better question is: What is the ratio of SB's to SD's in your market? The higher the average number of SB's there are for each SD the better your opportunity is to get BCD with a new SB.
So, how to get the SD data? I have a created a fake SB profile that I use for research like this. BUT, since I have not paid for SA membership (and I won't so I can stay UTR with Admin) my use of filters is very limited.
In my area, I can search for men within 10 miles, over 40, non-smokers and get 261 profiles. 123 have been active in the last week. Compare that to my August, 2020 data showing the number of SB's within 10 miles, 18-38 years, non-smokers is 2,559.
So 2,559 / 123 = 20.8 SB's per viable SD.
Papa, I encourage you to try this for your area (or PM me your city and I'll do it for you) and get the ratio.
If the 20.8 t o1 ratio holds in your area don't you think you can find 1, 2 or even 5 or 6 SB's from that pack of 20?
Going forward, I'll pull the qualified SD data for my area whenever I review the SB demographics.
Life is good
The Cat
Of course you're right, as usual. (That's a very annoying habit of yours Herb, cut that out! Haha) The ratio of SD/SB is way more significant than the absolute number of either one. I was just thinking about the SBs, and believe me, I ain't bitchin. I continue to have more prime pussy than I can handle, so no complaints. I really wish this fucking pandemic was over so I could return to my slutty ways and re-create my formerly overlarge rotation. Right now I'm really limiting my "social bubble". But I will indeed run the search for SDs that you describe and post my results here soon.
But first , I reviewed what Herb said and realize I am confused. You said the number of SBs in your geographic area (10 miles) 18-38, is 2559. But you didn't say of that was for all of them or only those active within a week or two. Also you didn't say if they were filtered for body type. So I'm not sure how my numbers will compare.
Anyway, searching for men in my area (my town plus 100 miles), over 40, I find 580. But 56% of those have no pictures posted. Only 211 had pictures, and of those, only 104 were active in the past week. My SB search gave 1618, close enough, correct age and body type. That would suggest 15.5 to 1 ratio of SBs to SDs. But if I further refine my SB search to only those active in the past 2 weeks, the number drops to a mere 394, giving a ratio of just 3.8 to 1.
Stepping back from these numbers my opinion is that all the other SDs in my area are not significant competition! There's no one quite like me and the SBs who want what I have to offer recognize that fact and tell me I'm unique. So my job is still the same, regardless of the numbers: promote myself well and find the ones who respond enthusiastically. Seems to work well for me, regardless of what the ratios may suggest.
I'm not on SA so I can't find the answer to this on my own. Can you SA guys chime in?
.
Can SBs do the same search but in reverse? "How many potential SDs are in my geographic area?" It might come in handy for POT SBs to do an analysis and consider: "There are 100 POT SDs centered 10 miles around my city, City-A. If I expand the search to +100 miles, there are still only 250 SDs. I can easily drive to City-B (and I have a friend I can crash with if I'm too tired to drive home). City-B has 400 POT SDs within 10 miles and 1000 POT SDs within 100 miles. ... Maybe I should change my main city to City-B?"
.
To be thorough, she would also have to know the number of SBs that are listing in each area in order to get the all important SB/SD ratio. If SDs can only search SBs and SBs can only search SDs, maybe you can find an SB and form a research collaboration. You can submit the results right here for peer review and publication.
Posted By: sweetman
Re: OK so I'm crunching some more numbers
But first , I reviewed what Herb said and realize I am confused. You said the number of SBs in your geographic area (10 miles) 18-38, is 2559. But you didn't say of that was for all of them or only those active within a week or two. Also you didn't say if they were filtered for body type. So I'm not sure how my numbers will compare.
Herb gets his SD data by posting a fake SB profile and using it to search the guys. I get my SD data by using my awesome wife's SA profile, logging on from her computer and looking at the guys. SBs can indeed search from any given search point, any selected radius from there just as we SDs can. And it does reveal interesting results! There are several target rich environments I've located that way. If I ever move from here, I'll pick a spot with tons of cute SBs.
Small caveat to Papa Sweet's answer, please.
If the SB has not paid for a premium account (using only a free account), they get the same search screen as SD and paid SB's get, BUT several filters are locked and can't be used. In my free SB profile I can't use:
Options: "Premium" account checkbox
Body Type
Ethnicity
Relationship Status
Annual Income
Net Worth
and I can't search profile text for key words or phrases.
So my SD searches are only filtered for:
Distance - 10 miles
Men (not women)
Age - 40+
Non-smoking
I then scan the list of results (viewing 100 a a time) to manually count the number actives in a desired time frame like 1 week.
But don't get too caught up in how I search. What matters for this local market analysis is that you use the same filters and criteria for your area each time you pull the data. That will give you the baseline needed to compare period to period. The same holds if you want to compare one local market to another, say Orlando to Taos.
What's a favorable ratio? of SB's to SD's? Well obviously the more SB's per per SD the better. My rough math shows about 20 SB's for every 1 SD. Papa Sweet's data shows about 4 SB's to every 1 SD. Is his better than mine? Doesn't matter unless Papa is planning a trip to LA so he can pull some Palm-Tree Pussy! No worries, Papa, we can slice this pie
(pun intended) into as many pieces (pun intended again as needed.
Life is good
The Cat
...with the magnitude of profiles, but with whether there are new faces. Before paying up, I'll browse and make note of new faces, and also how many I recognize as perpetually on there. I look for age 35+, so there are usually only several pages of recently active babies that fall within my search parameters.
