Seeing some newer peeps asking or talking about their potential or perceived Unicorns and it occurs to me that it's time to resend this older post.  
.
Unicorns - "I don't think this word means what you think it means"  
.
Gents,  
.
I must respectfully ask us all to pause for a moment to consider the use of the term "Unicorn" in the SB context. I think we all (including myself) have been relaxing what we mean when we use this term.  In the strictest sense of an  
SB Unicorn, I would expect the defining qualities to include (almost) all of the following:  
.
1. Unlimited energy, libido and appreciation for sex with her SD  
2. Minimal, or at least well-below the market, rate for p4p sugar  
3. No demands for monthly allowance without an ironclad agreement to meet x times per month for y hours per meet (includes overnights for little or no extra sugar).  
4. NO BSC behavior, no drama, no grief - ever.  
5. BBBJ, Greek, CIMNQNSWS (or whatever alphabet soup you like) every time.  
6. Willing, even anxious to go on road trips/travel with you.  
7. Wiling, even anxious to bring a hot friend, sister, (twin!), etc. for BCD.  
8. Post- (and pre-) BCD cuddle time.  
.
All this calls to mind the reason we call these SB's Unicorns; they don't exist.  
.
However, thinking back on posts over the last few months, I think I see a trend to call an SB a  Unicorn using a much shorter list. Probably the only persistent criteria that seems to sustain in various posts is #4: No BSC behavior.    
To me that is the minimum criteria to sustain a SB in my rotation. But it does not by itself earn a Unicorn designation.  As soon as I see the tip of the BSC iceberg, I tell her that's not acceptable and one more "infraction" will result in parting ways.    
.
So - back to your post and ongoing unicorn hunt, Prince. If you accept most or all of my unicorn qualifying criteria, then you cannot actually define any POT SB as a unicorn until you have had one (or preferably more) BCD sessions and have seen a consistent behavior pattern emerge. Still you can certainly hunt for them and hope/predict/project that they will be the elusive Unicorn we all seek.  
.
Having said all that: Good luck in your hunt!  
.
I wish you success and pray you are not trying to tag any of the SB's in my Los Angeles-based rotation.  :p  
.
As always, I welcome comments, debate and discussion.    
.
-The Cat

and I think it is just as inaccurate a term.

I don't know if I prompted this since I recently had a Unicorn thread, but in case it was, I'm definitely not a "noob", I've been an SD for over two years now.  Either way, I'll start by saying my new SB checks all 8 of those boxes if that's your criteria.  With that said, pretty sure this version of "unicorn" and your 8 item checklist is not in Websters,  I would even suggest it's not complete.  I would include 9.  Enjoys dirty talk and 10. Sends dirty pictures.   Mine still checks all the boxes, woooo!  But my point being, I think if you have been around long enough and done the dance and the search as an SD long enough, and browsed thousands of profiles and met hundreds of women, there doesn't have to be a checklist, you just KNOW when you have a good one.  And just because we use the term "Unicorn" doesn't mean it has to literally be 1 in a billion doesn't exist kind of thing, I can call myself a Superman in the bedroom, but I don't shoot lasers out of my eyes and fly over the bed either.  

Ya got 10000+ SBs in your market. Send some out to the desert.

There are 6,400+ SB's under 30 within 25 miles of my location in the San Fernando Valley (as of today).  
.
That means I'd need to bang 17.5 of them a day to get through all of them in one year.  
.
If I only look at 18 to 24 year old SB's, it's still a population of 4,063. (That's 11 a day.)
.
Life is good.

OK, after all the negative response I got previously, I just assume by "ironclad agreement" you mean one clearly spelled out verbally - lol.

Yes, the "agreement" point is more about having a specific, transparent discussion and agreement on what each person will do, when they will do and what they will not do as well.  This is really an ongoing discussion, not a starting event to be checked off the list, as your relationship and therefore your arrangement may (will) evolve over time.  
.
As to #8, this is also more about the nuances of a sugar relationship and each of us defines these according to their own desires and needs. Each of use needs to identify what those thing are. For me, it's about things like post-coitus cuddling and mutual signs of affection in bed and in public (as opposed to a "pro" will generally hop out of bed, towel off and get dressed hoping that I will do so as well and GTF out of there).  Of course, DD/lg can be fun for those who want it. But it's not for everyone. I don't have any kids, and I'd like to think I would NOT want to fuck my daughter if I had one.  I typically ask most of my SB's not to call me Daddy, It doesn't normally get me turned on, either because I'm just not that into the idea, or perhaps (I must admit) because most SB's can't act well enough to make it believable.

IMHO number three would simply read "no demands for monthly allowance. PERIOD

Appearance is a prerequisite to even start with a POT SB. If your dick isn't trying to think for you, she's never going to be a Unicorn.

Why get so rigid about it?  Unicorn should be a loose term because most of those criteria are subjective. I know my ATFs are unicorns in my book. To me, they are over the top hot, but many guys might find them too thin or too short. I may not find many of your unicorns to be that attractive.  

Personally, I do have a daughter and I would punch someone square in the jaw that accused me of ever doing anything inappropriate to her and the thought sickens me.  I would literally be in jail for murder if she were ever assaulted.  

Your point is well made, and actually compliments my original post... Much of what defines a true "unicorn" is subjective based on the SD's point of view, needs, and fantasies. Such a unicorn will score high marks on whatever list of requirements (the OP has mine) the SD has. But I posit that as a group we are using the term way too often to describe any SB who happens to knock it out of the park on only one or a few of the items in their requirements list. My suggestion is that we save the unicorn label only for those who deliver at least 80%-90%+ of "your" list.  
.
If it's less, you can certainly celebrate your fortune to find an SB who will do "X" with you, and possibly "Y" as well. But that's not a true unicorn, is it?  
.
As I mentioned a while back, I believe the reason we collectively use the term "Unicorn" is that, just like the Unicorn's of fantasy stories, they don't really exist. No SB is perfect, yet we keep looking for one (or more!) who is.

I don't think I have ever used the term myself to describe any of the women I have seen. Just like I don't use the term ATF.  

Fair question:  
.
In this context, "we" is just a generalization used by me to mean the collective group of SD's in the forum. It is not intended to be inclusive of all SD's. Just a non-scientific generalization.  
.
I would not expect you to use the term, GaGa, unless you showed up with a pic of you riding an actual Unicorn, with a golden saddle, medium-toned color (I know, Unicorns are supposed to be white), and a naked, petite, Asian hottie riding behind you holding a sign that said:  "GaGa is my Dada!" :p

I agree most of the “unicorns” are probably MEH, just based on how often I’m really attracted to girls my friends are ogling and the amount I spend on my unicorns, who do actually fulfill all of the above criteria, at least while I was fucking them a lot.  One went a little crazy when she got replaced but she fucks me for free every now and then so she’s still a unicorn.