... when she's sucking your dick. :p
Seriously, I stay away from the implications that arise from these discussions. In my mind it's just not a linear discussion that:
1. Better looks requires/deservers more allowance.
2. Better looks equals less skill BCD
3. Less attractive equals better skills BCD
To be fair, I just won't agree to more than my set BCD/PPM budget (between $250 and $400) for allowance - no matter how hot she is, with the only exception being A-List or B-List porn stars (I have 2 right now) who used to (or still do) escort at rates in the $1,500 to $2,500/hour range. And even then, my budget for porn stars is around $600-$800, mostly because I generally only see them once every other month or less.
So using an absolute budget filter may mean I don't really count 10's who "demand" $800+ PPM, and my personal results are skewed. But I'd say 60% of my SB's are at least 8's to 10's. The lower 40% are 7's. I just can't even start with a POT who doesn't make me hard when I look at her pics, so the "chubby but cute" and the "butter face" POT's are non starters for me.
All of my SB's are great in bed. I recently posted about an Asian/French SB, who is definitely a 10, that I let go. Her allowance was $350, and her BCD skills were off the charts. But there were other reasons that made me need to end the arrangement. Perhaps living in a high-volume POT area gives me more opportunity to find the "gems." If you start with over 10,000 active profiles in a 25 mile radius, finding 5-8 that will fit all your criteria could be just a matter of sorting through more profiles to get what you want. While those living in "pussy Siberia" may need to select from a much smaller sample and so might end up needing to adjust their criteria to get to BCD.
Life is good
The Cat