So, just for fun, decided to search a EU location.
In this case, close to my main girl who is from Belgrade.
Searched within 100 km...so the interesting part is about 80% of the girls are "slim"
Compare this to the USA, about 80% are "athletic" or "average"
Remember taking with GaGa about this a few years ago.
"athletic" are about 10 lbs overweight, "average" about 20 lbs.
It's getting to be really sad.  
I'm getting grossed out how many girls have flesh overflowing their jeans.   LOL

As the whole population gets larger, one would expect SB's and escorts to get larger.  Also, I suspect that larger chicks have trouble getting dates from commitment oriented men, so they opt to sell one night stands, rather than give them away free -- thus also explaining the relatively high representation of heavy SB's.

But there is nothing you can do about FAT. I have even had a lot of POT SB's representing themselves as "slim" who can only be objectively described as FAT. Just this last week I have a POT SB who is listed as "slim" admit to me before our initial date that she was Preggo. Curiosity got the best of me so I met her anyhow, (she was in a city about an hour away and I was already in that city to meet up with another POT SB that same day) and she looked like she was due in just a few weeks, I mean WTF???!!!

Normally, I don't search curvy b/c the ROI is just too low - but, that having been said, occasionally I find a few gems there.
Typically it's the girls with big boobs and a body that's classifiable as athletic.
Unfortunately, it's also the land of the hippos where +40lbs is more the norm.  *eek*

who are slender.  Your weight definition for athletic, average and curvy are about the same as mine.  I will take skinny  or athletic, but average and curvy are just not appealing to me.  

… that I am fat as well (but I have the cash!).  
.
I only search for slim or athletic - unless I'm getting a really low number of results.  Interesting that IME, maybe 15%-25% of POT's, especially the new ones, include something in thier profiles like "I prefer fit guys."  My assumption is these POT's a under the fantasy that a "real" SD will always look like Richard Gere.  I give these an insta-pass.  
.
The other side of the spectrum are POT's who say something like "looks are not important to me, as long as we connect (or you have a as sense of humor, or you are a gentleman, blah, blah, blah)."  What that really means is "I'm prioritizing for budget, not muscles/youth."  Which is what a POT should do.  
.
I'll add the additional observation that her looks do not appear to me to have a high correlation to her willingness to be DTF or how kinky she may be, nor does it (with the exception of LA-10's) affect her allowance expectation. I think there are other factors that affect these aspects much more, like desperation for cash, personal morals, daddy/family issues, and her perception that she is getting her "max value" possible from daddy.  
.
Life is good.
.
The Cat

As a general rule, women don't "settle" downward (hypergamy). If they once got a high reward, they are unlikely to come down except in severe desperation.  

It only takes them about thirty seconds to get accustomed to a higher standard of living or an increase in rates, and they have this uncanny ability to wipe out any memories of their previous lower rate or standard of living, I am sure most of them could pass a lie detector test if asked "Have you always gotten $1,000 a date?" even if they still have a ad up listing themselves for $60 hr. lol

As a youth I'd cut my neighbor's grass (the push mower, not motorized) for 25 cents.  As a teen I was a car hop at a restaurant for a buck an hour.  No shame in any of that.  And $60/hr is a good wage relatively speaking.  

Last year I pursued this really hot girl I saw coming on at least once a week.  After a couple of texts she said her last guy gave her anything she wanted...shopping,, her rent,, her car...etc.  When I finally  cornered her, she said something like 500 per week...maybe more.  Well, I countered-offered 350, and after several weeks, she said reluctantly 'yes.'
Funny, thing, I guess it was more just the chase, b/c I didn't follow through.  I mean, there's a likely chance she would have eventually replaced me with Mr. Big Bucks. But somehow, I felt I let her down  LOL
She didn't seem so hot afterwards...LOL

evaluate "value" without clarifying how many times a week she will see you for the $500 she wanted.  $500 per meet is a little steep in Sugarland, but I know some guys who like PPM more than a weekly or monthly allowance.  To me, it seems they pay more in the long run doing it on a per-meet basis, but they seem to want have the option to get out quickly if they meet someone better and want to switch  girls, and don't want to leave any unused "credits" on the table that they have prepaid.  

The key with "the last guy gave me everything" is that, okay where is he now?  I guess it didn't work out so well after all.  What did you do to drive away this gold mine?

Yeah, you're pretty much preaching to the choir.  I've more-or-less starting offering 500 per week, even denigrating the PPM guys as 'low life scum"  lol

Any sort of money given in advance is at extreme risk.  Ppm is really the only way to keep them honest.

I don't mind offering a "weekly allowance" of lets say $500 week. When she comes over on Monday I give her $100, Tuesday $100, Wednesday..... I am sure you can see where this is headed. lol

I only do PPM, never a time based allowance.  Yes, part of my reasoning is to jump ship and upgrade, without leaving unused credits on the table,  if I find a better SB.  I'm a horny opportunistic old slut, what can I say. But mostly I'm trying to control my budget as well as their expectation$. I offer $200 ppm and that's what I gift them nearly 100% of the time.  If I was happy with only 1 SB at a time, then $400 or $500 a week might seem ok.  But I'm not.  I usually have several SBs I'm rotating through so I get to spend a reasonable amount of money and enjoy the variety I crave.

Young, slim, gorgeous boobs, face, body, really a 10.  When I asked her why she posted under curvy she said, well because I am curvy!  I explained to her that in Sugarspeak curvy was a euphemism for overweight.  She changed it to slim shortly thereafter and got lots more attention! So I still check curvy every once in a while.  Occasionally it pays off, but I'm never expecting much.

I tend to agree, but it's kinda opened my eyes by something HerbC said.
My ROI on "average" has been very low.
Still hard to view the photos where they're wearing tight shorts and the flesh is overflowing!
It's also occurring to me that most of the fatty girls just pick "average" cause it's easy.
Same way guys might...just might...fudge their age a bit, the girls  have no problems with their weight!
Recently, I've had more success clicking on 'curvy' than 'average'

Appreciate the shout out.  
.
Just an aside; I never trim years off my age. There's no point. And yet, many SB's that I meet, and even civvie women, tell me I look much younger than my age.  Flattery? Of course.  But a savvy POT SB knows that more age generally = more disposable cash.  
.
It's also telling to see those profiles that have stated they are looking for younger men, say under 40 or even younger. These chicks are just living in Fantasy Land.  Interestingly, I see about 10% of SD profiles in my area (using my fake SB account) are wannabe ballers under 30 claiming net worth well over $50 million. Sure it's possible. But c'mon!  If you have $50-$100m you have a "person" who recruits your top-shelf companions for you.  
.
Still,  
.
Life is good
.
The Cat

...out of a 26yo girl specifying an age range of 18-32.
Obviously her success with a 30-something will be near zero, but it also begs the question: can a guy younger than the girl truly be a sugar-DADDY?  lol

monthly and it doesn't work that well.  The last half of the month you get excuses of why they can't be available when you can, so it drives your brain over to PPM calculations by default.  The only one I had the worked was a girl that I saw twice first at PPM, then when we both wanted to continue, she agreed to take a monthly payment on the 15th for a month that starts on the first.  This way, she is trusting me for the first half of the month, and I am trusting her for the second half.  After much trial and error, I learned that weekly works better if you are paying direct compensation to a girl for sex.  The one I have now is a completely different arrangement, and came about by accident, but its the best one I've been in so far.  

haven't done this so much to where I've become much of a connoisseur of this behavior...and of course, we all know "you pay a whore to leave and a SB to stay," but it's becoming more prevalent that the fun girls do stay around while the others take a shower and leave!  I haven't based my allowance schedule so much off this - but thanks, I think I should!!

So, again in a moment of boredom, searched the next 50 girls in my area (Phx) that list themselves as "average."
20 are morbidly overweight, waaaaay past 'curvy'.  Not to be raciest, but nearly all Latino are such.
15 are definitely overweight and badly out of shape.
10 are overflowing their cutoff's but manageably so.
5 are quite nice.
Thinking it would be nice to have another measure of fattiness.  Maybe dress size?   LOL

Maybe their dress maker, Omar the tent maker, could provide their tent size, I mean dress size.🤣

I hunt in the same forest and definitely concur. In fact 5 is good. Conversely if you search on "slim" I would say 70% are not.  My last set of m&g's had 3 "slims" in a row that turned out to be fatties, one with a double chin. I have a m&g scheduled next week but she won't send me any full length photos. She already deleted her profile on SA. I'm wondering if I should cancel.

but every good gambler knows to hedge his bets every once in a while, especially when the odds are against him.

In that link picture, I'm actually open to most except 6 and 7.  Unfortunately a lot of SB's are 6's on the way to 7's.    Also unfortunately there is this new "fat is beautiful" movement or "beauty is a social construct" movement.  So these girls aren't getting the message to reign in their appetites and they just keep blowing up bigger and bigger.  And forget about looks, it's just plain unhealthy.  Guess what, health isn't a social construct.

I have to mention that those (and other) great suggestions were from the days of TER reviews when the clients would be submitting the info and would be, one hopes, somewhat reliable. If an SB voluntarily mentions her BMI or a silhouette match in her listing it could still prove to be, eh, an optimistic and unreliable representation.
.
(Other suggestions for a revamped reviewing method: replace "race" with "complexion" and "hair color" from 1-10 color palettes, not subjective adjectives.)

SB's trolling SA for a SD would knowing lie about their looks?!!  I'm shocked, shocked, I say!!!!!

Others are not, but the one thing I think we can all agree on is that you have a LOT of ideas on the subject. lol

...so just for interest, do a search in Milano.
Find no less than 30 fabulous slim girls.
Hate it here in this USA cesspool!!

You get to see new places, eat new food, drink new drinks and fuck new women.