The Erotic Highway

Now, what if
Euro-Guy 75 reads
posted

she had said $250 ppm.

 
Would we be having this discussion??   lol

 
For me, the 'violation' wasn't the PPM, but that any SB can even considering asking 2K.  I have confirmed (in between breaks of sucking my dick) that at least a few actually do get such amounts.  And, it's not that it's a free market, it's more that a few rich losers can really fuck up what's a nicely balanced system of supply and demand.

 
Whenever a babe mentions PPM, which of course they can do albeit a warning message, I don't block or take any drastic action, but simply state that such mentions are frowned upon and we should move off the App.  Guys are not going to be banned for just responding as long as your reply seems to be keeping with the new flow of the site....at least in my experience.

I DM'd a 23yo honey on SA yesterday, regular carefully worded intro message, saying hi, indicating my interest, nothing explicit.  Her reply was simply "my ppm is 2000".  Besides shaking my head in wonder about the enormous ask, I would think that if Admin was in any way serious about removing transactional arrangements from the site, they'd swarm all over a SB talking like that.  Guess not.

Maybe this is the new normal, or at least the new "current normal," while Seeking tweaks their rules and auto-admin systems.  

 
My guess is your blatant POT's profile will be gone in 3 to 4 days. either deleted or banned.  

 
It's clear that Seeking has yet to really clean up older profiles that no longer meet the new (mid-2025) standards. I still see many profiles that include taboo words and phrases in profile text or profile name/taglines.  It sort of makes sense I suppose. They are reluctant to outright kill what must be at least 30-65% of their active profiles. So instead, it's a softer effort of emails or on-screen messages when a user logs on.  

 
 But the use of "PPM" or other "bad" words in messages?  There is no reason why they can't prevent that now.  

 
Life is good

 
The Cat

-- Modified on 9/6/2025 4:49:19 PM

I got booted 4 years ago from  SA. Pissed off chick reported me for discussion of PPM. I avoid the disconnect SB but it comes up alot. No issues

BdrmFun4872 reads

Sweetman, same exact thing happened to me yesterday! Was about to ask a POT who replied to my inquiry for phone number when she replied 'I get 2K per meet, babe.' I didn't reply. Not only is it an unrealistic ask, in my view, but it places me at risk for being banned. I won't reply.

My sense is even if you aren’t the offending party , the fact you are in a conversation involving ppm is enough to get you in trouble nowadays  

I know it’s boneheaded  onseekings part , but it is what it is. Blocking ensures atleast to some degree , that you are protected from any blowback from the other side

Euro-Guy76 reads

she had said $250 ppm.

 
Would we be having this discussion??   lol

 
For me, the 'violation' wasn't the PPM, but that any SB can even considering asking 2K.  I have confirmed (in between breaks of sucking my dick) that at least a few actually do get such amounts.  And, it's not that it's a free market, it's more that a few rich losers can really fuck up what's a nicely balanced system of supply and demand.

 
Whenever a babe mentions PPM, which of course they can do albeit a warning message, I don't block or take any drastic action, but simply state that such mentions are frowned upon and we should move off the App.  Guys are not going to be banned for just responding as long as your reply seems to be keeping with the new flow of the site....at least in my experience.

Well you are correct of course.  If she had said 250 ppm I'd have tried to continue the conversation offline.  But I think there's a real risk in doing so.  If Admin decided to read that message exchange it would be easy to claim I was "promoting" ppm, a banned transactional relationship.  I chose to simply not reply, not block her, nothing.

BdrmFun4869 reads

I believe this is the best way. Don't respond or block.

Register Now!