I've frequently pondered whether my B-List SB's, who are on the B-List because we don't meet regularly, are actually more "valuable" than my A-List regulars. I will exclude looks or allowance comparison for this discussion. Let's just assume that each looks hot enough for me to want to fuck, and gets an allowance I am willing to pay to do so.
The A-List regulars are dependable, and with regular meetings, we achieve deeper connection and trust which leads to learning how to please each other better. This just makes them amazing to be with. But is there a risk of getting bored? I won't answer that here... I'll just leave it to each reader to decide for themselves.
The B-Listers who wander into town from time to time are also dependable in that I know when we do meet it will be safe and fun. But perhaps the infrequency also lends a sense of variety, and an opportunity to, let's call it, "innovate" new experiences.
The AA spinner I met at a local strip club 8 years ago, who was also a former porn star, and was, TBH, also a former hooker (in and out of the club) visited me and gave me some interesting updates. She now has a civilian gig in Vegas and gave up stripping and hooking 6 months ago. She told me she was grateful for my continued support over the years - not much really: $40, $60 or so every 3 or 4 months to help her with unplanned issues. She decided to show me that I was an important part of her life by showing me the pink slip for the car she bought, her paystub from the new job and her recent test results before fucking me near to death for over 3 hours. When I started to hand her some allowance, she just said "I don't need that anymore Daddy. I left that life in the past." Now as I said, I had seen her paystub. So, I slipped $150 into her purse before she left anyway. I'm 99% sure she will end up asking for some emergency cash again in the next month or so. But I don't mind.
Still, the struggle to add new SB's is real, and more difficult than ever. Sigh...
Yesterday, I had to refuse to see a 19-yer-old babe who was willing to meet all my BCD asks but demanded all the allowance when she arrived. Predictably, she claimed she'd been ripped off by guys who refused to pay. And also predictably, I told her I'd been ripped off by women who ran out the door with my cash. Over the next hour of texts, I made offers to provide some cash up front, then the rest after. I suggested that my offer would allow us to share the risk. She tried several times to get me to agree to pay up front, changing her language from "when I arrive" to "just before we have sex." We had agreed to have a video chat one hour before our meeting time. I asked her to vid chat now, but she declined. I countered one last time with "half when you arrive, 25% when we are both naked in my bedroom and the rest when we are done." She declined and I passed. About 40 minutes later she told me she was ok with after IF I would send her $100 now, thus conclusively proving she is a scammer. Of course, I passed.
It was disappointing. Her pics were good: no hits on reverse image search or FaceCheck. Her chat before all the 'pay up front' BS was ok - no red flags. But as I am thinking it through, I realize I shouldn't have gone off script by not requiring a M&G before offering allowance and scheduling BCD. Cash loss avoided, but time wasted none the less.
Life is good
The Cat