Created a temporary (non-verified) SB profile last night, just to see what the opposition looks like (literally, in some cases).
1) Numbers
There are 6,600+ SBs within a 25 mile radius, and 1,600+ SDs. Ratio is almost exactly 4:1. I like those odds, even if they are not as good as those claimed by SA (10:1 ?).
2) Ages
I was surprised by the age profile of the SDs. Younger than I had anticipated - most SDs are not daddies! More than half seemed to be under 40. About 600 of 1,600 were over 40. Very steep drop off in numbers over 60. Oldest I noticed was one of 72. However, I also noticed that some of those who said they were in their 50s looked older to me.
3) Wealth/Income
Who knew there were so, so many Daddies with 10+ million in assets , and 1+ million pa?!! Every second to third guy! Lots with 100+ million in assets! Clearly the worth/income questions are utterly meaningless.
4) Photos
Was not scientific in counting, but my impressions is that somewhere between half to 2/3 of the profiles had photos. Surprised me that there were so many. Perhaps consistent with the cultural changes, the younger men seemed more inclined, on average, to have photos.
5) Privacy
Just to illustrate the down side of putting photos on SA, I immediately noticed the profile of one of my co-workers! If he really has over 100 million in assets, as he states, then why is he a wage slave, just like me?

Would not be good for him if his SA profile became public knowledge. Nothing to fear from me, but the potential is clearly there.
6) Pitches
Were all over the place. From offers of substantial monthly allowances, to no money at all, just access to a 9" "package," or no money, but travel. One of the profiles that did look like it belonged to a truly rich SD, focused on "mentorship" as the benefit - surprising.
-- Modified on 6/18/2017 2:28:59 PM