I’ve been musing with the idea of having my new SB sign a “Personal Services” contract wherein we clearly delineate what duties and services would be supplied by the respective parties.

The language of said contract would be crafted vaguely enough with regard to BCD so it couldn’t be taken as a promise of prostitution.

But, it would specify so many “meeting sessions” per month of a certain length and the appropriate compensation for them.

If desired, it would require exclusively, violations thereof would be subjected to a financial penalty of a specified amount. The SD would be the sole judge as to whether sufficient evidence existed to any violations.

Extras and other unanticipated payments made to the SB would be offset either against the following monthly allowance, or require other value added favors, e.g., house cleaning, grocery shopping, light yard work, meal prep, etc.

Payments made on behalf of the SB that were significant (>$1000) would be secured with a promissory note, hopefully with some SB property used as collateral, e.g., personal computer, marketable clothing, etc. [NB: while the enforceability of the note would be questionable, it does hang over the SB’s head}  

Frequent deviations from the contract would trigger automatic renegotiation of the terms, or simply a verbal notice from the SD of cancellation.
------------------------------

Comments?

Worst. Idea. Ever.  I won't even bother all the myriad of reasons why, I'll let someone else with more patience.

I am in a pretty good mood this morning so I am not going to ruin it by telling you how I REALLY feel about this dumbass idea. lol

I'm not in that good a mood so I'm going to tell you that's one of the stupidest ideas and posts I've EVER seen and there's no shortage of dummies around here.  
You must be an engineer or some other type of nerd geek with zero life experience.  
Pleeeeeaaasse think before acting and/or posting.

Unless you actually take a contract dispute to court, any disputes are going to be resolved by renegotiation anyway.  

So formalizing it in writing is mostly a waste of time.  

I won't pile on you on what a bad idea this is. But just for fairness to the concept, it's been done before - sort of...  
.
Fist example: Hugh Hefner and his TV Girlfriends. Each of those lovelies (i.e.: Gold Diggers) had a contract as a cast member on the show, and presumably, directly with Hef (or Playboy Inc.) as a "Girlfriend". I speculate that these contracts specifically called out that sexual services were excluded (or whatever legal wording would do that) and just let the audience think that Hef was banging them by inference of the context of the show.  Note that at least one of them left the show for their "real" BF later. I was never really a fan of the show, but the blondes were hot, so....
.
Next: One of my SB's told me when we started meeting that her car was provided by her last SD and included a contract. Apparently, he owned a used car business and offered her one of the cars in his inventory. The deal was that she "owed" him a car payment of $200 a week until she paid off the total price of $4600. But they also had a verbal agreement that she could substitute any payment with a 1-hour BCD. He kept a running balance-owed spreadsheet to track all "payments". When I met her she still owed $1200, and she said having sex with that guy was revolting, but she usually didn't have the cash.  I had her switch to BCD with me for $300 and she eventually paid off the car and got a singed pink slip.  
.
Finally: I have only vague notions of super-rich guys who have hired "high-profile" models as their girlfriend for a one-year term. These look sort of like a prenup in that they specify monthly salary, end of service payouts, and include penalties for infidelity (hers, not his).  
.
Having said all that, I return to the premise of all previous feedback; It's a stupid idea. It's almost certainly not enforceable in any court; you cannot contract for illegal services. No lawyer would agree to take the case. And even if you did get past all that and actually get a judgement, you're personal business will become public record and she will never make good on the court ordered damages because - ok, you all see this warming up, right? - she is a SB and has NO FUCKING MONEY!
.
Note: I am still not a lawyer, so I offer no legal advice. Just my personal opinion.  

If you are very unlucky, she'll sign it, and make your life a living hell with the loopholes she will find.

 
Why would you ever want to be tied down when the name of this game is no strings attached?

Why ruin a good thing?

An executed copy, of course.  

I figure it'll save me the effort of having to send a document production request during discovery.  

You can also save me some money by putting an exhibit tag on it. "A" is fine.

Thanks!

IRS
Documented payments for meeting sessions become taxable income, no longer excludable as personal gifts since they are spelled out as an exchange of services
1099 would have to be issued and she is out 20% of her allowance.

Nice reply, good to see there is actually some intelligence on this board - lol.  I'll ignore most of the others since they apparently haven't had the life experience where one might actually hire people and issue them contracts, especially personal service ones.  

But, just for fun, bounced it off 5 SB's [demographics: average age 27, average education: 3.2 years college] and it was incredibility well received!  Two of them asked: "where's the pen?"  Most of the comments seemed to indicate the babes thought they were more or less getting a guaranteed allowance in contrast to the deals offered by many of the flakely SD.  They liked the concept that what was expected from both parties was clearly delineated.  When I pointed out the "contract" tended to favor the SD and could easily be dissolved several said something to the effect: "well a real man wouldn't do that," and "he would feel guilty if he did," and the like.

You understand, of course, I was just musing - really have no intention of doing so...

But seriously, most of you guys really are too much.

once and it was the worst Sugar Dating mistake I ever made. As Herb reported, I spelled out how many payments were due and gave her the car.  It may actually have been enforceable in a court I don't know.  She and I had an unwritten understanding that the payments would consist of BCD dates and if she ever got tired of me she could always pay cash. Of course she ghosted, I was very upset, and out the $$ I had spent on the car. I took my lumps and moved on.  So I'm actually curious to know if you try it how it works out for you. I do think it's interesting that some SBs like the idea.  Still, I think the reality of being bound by a contract will make things go sour very quickly.

Make sure you post the outcome. I want to read some funny stories.  

That said, there are similar contracts for rich Arab whale daddies that have multiple toilet girls organized by pussy managers for $100k a year or some shit like that.  

It makes no sense for the scale we’re talking about. I’ve literally lost NO MONEY on sugar babies. The most I’ve ever gambled on a sugar baby was about $2000, meaning the money went to her without any kind of prearranged agreement over sex. A couple of times, this was rent, once a nice handbag, once some car shit. Every time, I’ve way gotten more sex in return than a hooker would provide. Like, well within the 100-200 per session range if you break it down.  And there’s something to be said for banging a girl every other day for a month or two without any mention of cash. Not having to arrange sessions with her and just showing up and banging her like a boyfriend would is worth something to me too.  

$2000 is a hand of blackjack for me and I would only front that much money to my ATFs.  That’s not even worth going to small claims court if you have real sugar daddy income.  

I realize I’m a little different than most of the guys here though, in that if I like a girl and she likes me, I quickly get out of the ppm mindset and move to favors and big gifts for unspecified amounts of sex. I never do monthly or anything “contract like”. I just make sure she’s hooked and when the chemistry is good, there’s never an issue.  

I honestly lose way more money TOFTT on pros. If I get there and shes not as hot as her pics, it’s a waste of money in my book. That happens every few sessions with pros but never with sugar babies who I’ve taken out and made out with for a preview before bcd.

You make some good points.

Like I said above, probably wouldn't do it...

The enforceability is not something I would even want to contemplate.  It's more just you plant the idea in the SB's brain that she might be held responsible as a way of having her toe the line.

Yeah, it wasn't that the SBs just like it, they were amazingly enthusiastic about the concept. Obviously, I would have written any contract where 95% of the terms favored the SD, so either they didn't anticipate that, or they simply blew it off.

Of course you do have to understand that I have tended to associate with the more "elite" girls on SA...the ones that originally expected 3.5-5K per month...hahaha.  They're probably worth it - just not to me.  I mean don't take this personally (because I like your style) but they, in no way in hell, with step into a curbside RV!

For me it was just an out of the box idea to prevent those inevitable conflicts that almost always arise, as Herb  and others have experienced when the financial bar seems to keep moving upward.

Mr. Eisenberg, I applaud you!  That is the trick.  Get them to be so into you money doesn’t come up.  Buy them a bobble when they need it or want it every so often and they’ll fuck You multiple times no cash or questions asked.  Perfect!!