I'm finding that after weight (less than 60 kg)  as a filter.

 
I've been putting in something more than HS for education.  

 
The uneducated might suck you dick like a pro, but afterwards talking about the weather bores me.

 
Any thoughts?

I haven't found any correlation between a girl's education (or lack thereof) and how interesting she is to talk to.  If she's uneducated, then, ok, intellectual conversations might be out.  But that doesn't mean she's boring or shallow.  Some of the least educated girls I've met have been thirsty for knowledge, very emotionally intelligent, had a bunch of life experiences, and were really great conversationalists.  And some college educated girls were duds to talk to.  But yeah, they did suck dick like a pro, so, not complaining!

I do very little filtering other than distance. A certain percentage aren't honest about their weight and education. I like to cast a wide net, since so few respond and even fewer end up even meeting. I'm also pretty open minded about weight and education, I've found thicker women I've enjoyed being with as well as uneducated ones. [within reason!] Everyone brings uniqueness to the party. There are some diamonds in the rough. For me, the joy of discovery is expanded by less filtering. [Although I do wish there were a flake filter!]

But I do it for the opposite result.  

 
Bear in mind that my preferred age group is 18-24 (and when necessary, up to 34). I often find that POT's with grad or post-grad degrees have higher asks for allowance and date experiences and are less open to my BCD asks. Ultimately, they tend to perform at a lower level when BCD (if she thinks she's doing you a favor by sucking your dick, it shows).  

 
So sometimes I will set my filter to look for HS only. But I can't say there is anything close to a 100% reverse correlation between education and BCD performance.  

 
I don't have difficulty conversing with people at any level, really. I try to approach every conversation with curiosity.    

 
Life is good

 
The Cat

Would tend to agree there's little correlation between BCD performance  and education

I suppose since I have a graduate degree (yes, Dr. Euro-Guy) I just tend to associate with such humans.

In my current rotation: #1 a lawyer, #2 MBA, #3 nursing student.   And yes, they spend my money for stupid shit.   lol

Whenever I wonder off looking for new talent, I just find myself a bit bored with the typical HS girl.

I try to look at the whole person, a holistic approach, and education is one factor to take into account.  
The more education she is, the more likely we can communicate meaningfully - got guaranteed but more likely.
Similarly, the less educated, the more likely that our only point of contact will be our loins. This is one key factor if the intention to have a long term arrangement.

The best SB I ever had was a masters student at a leading university. Smart, well traveled, well educated, easily able to communicate meaningfully on wide variety of topics. By contrast, I also had one time get togethers with SBs who had no idea about places I visited, topics I raised, etc.

Nicely phrased.
And I think this ties in with the attribute of "boredom" being discussed by the guys in the Exit Strat thread above.
I've been blessed with sufficient financial resources to allow me to pursue only TER 9+ girls, which I now do exclusively.
But in the end, like you, I so much enjoy the intelligent banter that the more educated girls provide.
Weird thing, not so much related to this thread, I'm finding the "chase" almost as much fun as winning the "prize."
I'm a relatively simple guy, but I must have had a least 200 beauties in the past 15 years.
Ashamed to say I probably remember a dozen of their names.
As Heb says: Life if Good!