Just got a message from a POT SB. You may have noticed that SA has added more social media type functions to chat recently. Specifically, a user can send GIF's and Pics attached to a message within the message system.  It's similar to text chat, FB Messenger, IG, Snap, etc.  

About a month ago a SB I was talking to on SA sent me 2 pics on the message system. They were both blurred and had the "tap to view image" message on them. They were both cute pics but very G-rated. So I don't think SA is monitoring or censoring content on images sent on the message system.

... I'm never going to share personal info or pics of a POT I've seen on the site.   I just don't that kind of bad karma.  

I got a nude pic embedded in a PM on SA about a month ago.  It surprised me.  

anything untoward through the system messages, but did get a few tits with nipple clamps early on in the texts exchange.

I have gotten similar a few times recently. It did feel like a pro just blasting out messages across the board to pickup clients. I haven’t engaged any of them but definitely seems like SA isn’t really monitoring this. On a more macro level trend, it seems like SA has taken a step back in general in terms of monitoring. I’ve gotten much more straight forward and explicit proposals recently directly thru the site. I doubt I was the first one and they are still on the site and active. Not sure if this helps but definitely seems like it’s becoming more of a trend.

You may be right.  Yesterday one of the potentials I've been chatting up on the SA msg board said "a question I have is how are you going to pay and how much ?"  That's about as explicit as you could get.  Of course I replied that we should discuss specifics offsite.  But I don't think SA ever monitored the girls' posts for explicit talk about $$ as much as they monitored the guys' posts.

I don't think there is a prohibition about money in general, it was just pay per meet which is closer to prostitution, rather than pay per week or month.  And certainly explicit pay for sex is a no no.

since my specific conversations about money are always going to be about "gift per visit" I always want them to be offsite.

Sorry to seem ignorant, but What is SA?

A site for sugar daddies and sugar babies to hook up on.

Much to my surprise I recently saw a new SB profile with about 5 sexy pics, posted publicly not hidden, with real nudity. She has her top pulled up above her boobs, one of which is clearly visible, nipple and all.  So I don't know if SA is monitoring and censoring pictures for content as I have always assumed, or if this one simply slipped by unnoticed. But it's been online for about two weeks so far.  I was really surprised (and pleased!) to see it.

It's all changing so rapidly.  Saw a profile photo yesterday where she had a see thru top on, sans bra.  Might as well have been a nude photo.  They were nice ones too.  Couple years ago I had a DM turned back because they deemed I had made reference to PPM.  Have seen numerous profiles of late where it's talked about openly.  Here's a couple, word for word:  "PPM arrangement", "per interaction".  Who knows why, but I'm liking the evolution.  Cut to the chase I say.

Their one protection against being seized by the Feds was to avoid looking like a prostitution market.  If they allow this it must be because they are safely offshore.

There has been a lot of discussion (news, editorials, op ops, 60 Minutes, etc.) of the spreading use of facial recognition software. Maybe the US NSA and China's NSA need to put some effort into "Boob recognition software" to monitor the posting of nudes to SA?

...and after they perfect the boob recognition software they can get to work on the very important pussy recognition software.  Having made a lifelong  study of the intricacies and features of female genitalia I can attest that they are each as unique and identifiable as faces or fingerprints.